Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty with Bony and Metallic versus Standard Bony Reconstruction for Severe Glenoid Bone Loss. A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study

There are different techniques to address severe glenoid erosion during reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). This study assessed the clinical and radiological outcomes of RSA with combined bony and metallic augment (BMA) glenoid reconstruction compared to bony augmentation (BA) alone. A review of pa...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marko Nabergoj, Lionel Neyton, Hugo Bothorel, Sean W. L. Ho, Sidi Wang, Xue Ling Chong, Alexandre Lädermann
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/a63d728ed7cc4ed998de2e17cc6ee1ee
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:a63d728ed7cc4ed998de2e17cc6ee1ee
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:a63d728ed7cc4ed998de2e17cc6ee1ee2021-11-25T18:01:12ZReverse Shoulder Arthroplasty with Bony and Metallic versus Standard Bony Reconstruction for Severe Glenoid Bone Loss. A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study10.3390/jcm102252742077-0383https://doaj.org/article/a63d728ed7cc4ed998de2e17cc6ee1ee2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/22/5274https://doaj.org/toc/2077-0383There are different techniques to address severe glenoid erosion during reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). This study assessed the clinical and radiological outcomes of RSA with combined bony and metallic augment (BMA) glenoid reconstruction compared to bony augmentation (BA) alone. A review of patients who underwent RSA with severe glenoid bone loss requiring reconstruction from January 2017 to January 2019 was performed. Patients were divided into two groups: BMA versus BA alone. Clinical outcome measurements included two years postoperative ROM, Constant score, subjective shoulder value (SSV), and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder (ASES) score. Radiological outcomes included radiographic evidence of scapular complications and graft incorporation. The BMA group had significantly different glenoid morphology (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and greater bone loss thickness than the BA group (16.3 ± 3.8 mm vs. 12.0 ± 0.0 mm, <i>p</i> = 0.020). Both groups had significantly improved ROM (anterior forward flexion and external rotation) and clinical scores (Constant, SSV and ASES scores) at 2 years. Greater improvement was observed in the BMA group in terms of anterior forward flexion (86.3° ± 27.9° vs. 43.8° ± 25.6°, <i>p</i> = 0.013) and Constant score (56.6 ± 10.1 vs. 38.3 ± 16.7, <i>p</i> = 0.021). The BA group demonstrated greater functional and clinical improvements with higher postoperative active external rotation and ASES results (active external rotation, 49.4° ± 17.0° vs. 29.4° ± 14.7°, <i>p</i> = 0.017; ASES, 89.1 ± 11.3 vs. 76.8 ± 11.0, <i>p</i> = 0.045). The combination use of bone graft and metallic augments in severe glenoid bone loss during RSA is safe and effective and can be considered in cases of severe glenoid bone loss where bone graft alone may be insufficient.Marko NabergojLionel NeytonHugo BothorelSean W. L. HoSidi WangXue Ling ChongAlexandre LädermannMDPI AGarticleshoulderprosthesisdefectreconstructionautologous graftsurvivorshipMedicineRENJournal of Clinical Medicine, Vol 10, Iss 5274, p 5274 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic shoulder
prosthesis
defect
reconstruction
autologous graft
survivorship
Medicine
R
spellingShingle shoulder
prosthesis
defect
reconstruction
autologous graft
survivorship
Medicine
R
Marko Nabergoj
Lionel Neyton
Hugo Bothorel
Sean W. L. Ho
Sidi Wang
Xue Ling Chong
Alexandre Lädermann
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty with Bony and Metallic versus Standard Bony Reconstruction for Severe Glenoid Bone Loss. A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study
description There are different techniques to address severe glenoid erosion during reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). This study assessed the clinical and radiological outcomes of RSA with combined bony and metallic augment (BMA) glenoid reconstruction compared to bony augmentation (BA) alone. A review of patients who underwent RSA with severe glenoid bone loss requiring reconstruction from January 2017 to January 2019 was performed. Patients were divided into two groups: BMA versus BA alone. Clinical outcome measurements included two years postoperative ROM, Constant score, subjective shoulder value (SSV), and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder (ASES) score. Radiological outcomes included radiographic evidence of scapular complications and graft incorporation. The BMA group had significantly different glenoid morphology (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and greater bone loss thickness than the BA group (16.3 ± 3.8 mm vs. 12.0 ± 0.0 mm, <i>p</i> = 0.020). Both groups had significantly improved ROM (anterior forward flexion and external rotation) and clinical scores (Constant, SSV and ASES scores) at 2 years. Greater improvement was observed in the BMA group in terms of anterior forward flexion (86.3° ± 27.9° vs. 43.8° ± 25.6°, <i>p</i> = 0.013) and Constant score (56.6 ± 10.1 vs. 38.3 ± 16.7, <i>p</i> = 0.021). The BA group demonstrated greater functional and clinical improvements with higher postoperative active external rotation and ASES results (active external rotation, 49.4° ± 17.0° vs. 29.4° ± 14.7°, <i>p</i> = 0.017; ASES, 89.1 ± 11.3 vs. 76.8 ± 11.0, <i>p</i> = 0.045). The combination use of bone graft and metallic augments in severe glenoid bone loss during RSA is safe and effective and can be considered in cases of severe glenoid bone loss where bone graft alone may be insufficient.
format article
author Marko Nabergoj
Lionel Neyton
Hugo Bothorel
Sean W. L. Ho
Sidi Wang
Xue Ling Chong
Alexandre Lädermann
author_facet Marko Nabergoj
Lionel Neyton
Hugo Bothorel
Sean W. L. Ho
Sidi Wang
Xue Ling Chong
Alexandre Lädermann
author_sort Marko Nabergoj
title Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty with Bony and Metallic versus Standard Bony Reconstruction for Severe Glenoid Bone Loss. A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study
title_short Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty with Bony and Metallic versus Standard Bony Reconstruction for Severe Glenoid Bone Loss. A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study
title_full Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty with Bony and Metallic versus Standard Bony Reconstruction for Severe Glenoid Bone Loss. A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study
title_fullStr Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty with Bony and Metallic versus Standard Bony Reconstruction for Severe Glenoid Bone Loss. A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty with Bony and Metallic versus Standard Bony Reconstruction for Severe Glenoid Bone Loss. A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study
title_sort reverse shoulder arthroplasty with bony and metallic versus standard bony reconstruction for severe glenoid bone loss. a retrospective comparative cohort study
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/a63d728ed7cc4ed998de2e17cc6ee1ee
work_keys_str_mv AT markonabergoj reverseshoulderarthroplastywithbonyandmetallicversusstandardbonyreconstructionforsevereglenoidbonelossaretrospectivecomparativecohortstudy
AT lionelneyton reverseshoulderarthroplastywithbonyandmetallicversusstandardbonyreconstructionforsevereglenoidbonelossaretrospectivecomparativecohortstudy
AT hugobothorel reverseshoulderarthroplastywithbonyandmetallicversusstandardbonyreconstructionforsevereglenoidbonelossaretrospectivecomparativecohortstudy
AT seanwlho reverseshoulderarthroplastywithbonyandmetallicversusstandardbonyreconstructionforsevereglenoidbonelossaretrospectivecomparativecohortstudy
AT sidiwang reverseshoulderarthroplastywithbonyandmetallicversusstandardbonyreconstructionforsevereglenoidbonelossaretrospectivecomparativecohortstudy
AT xuelingchong reverseshoulderarthroplastywithbonyandmetallicversusstandardbonyreconstructionforsevereglenoidbonelossaretrospectivecomparativecohortstudy
AT alexandreladermann reverseshoulderarthroplastywithbonyandmetallicversusstandardbonyreconstructionforsevereglenoidbonelossaretrospectivecomparativecohortstudy
_version_ 1718411765014855680