Microbiological Quality and Resistance to an Artificial Gut Environment of Two Probiotic Formulations

The quality control of probiotic products is the focus of numerous organizations worldwide. Several studies have highlighted the poor microbiological quality of many commercial probiotic formulations in terms of the identity of the contained microorganisms, viability, and purity, thus precluding the...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Diletta Mazzantini, Francesco Celandroni, Marco Calvigioni, Adelaide Panattoni, Roberto Labella, Emilia Ghelardi
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/a6724944e3f74eb083603ace93f1635d
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:a6724944e3f74eb083603ace93f1635d
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:a6724944e3f74eb083603ace93f1635d2021-11-25T17:35:33ZMicrobiological Quality and Resistance to an Artificial Gut Environment of Two Probiotic Formulations10.3390/foods101127812304-8158https://doaj.org/article/a6724944e3f74eb083603ace93f1635d2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/10/11/2781https://doaj.org/toc/2304-8158The quality control of probiotic products is the focus of numerous organizations worldwide. Several studies have highlighted the poor microbiological quality of many commercial probiotic formulations in terms of the identity of the contained microorganisms, viability, and purity, thus precluding the expected health benefits and representing a potential health risk for consumers. In this paper, we analyzed the contents of two probiotic formulations, one composed of an encapsulated mixture of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria, and one by a lyophilized yeast. The microorganisms contained in the products were quantified and identified using up-to-date methodologies, such as MALDI-TOF MS and metagenomic analysis. Moreover, as acid and bile tolerance is included among the criteria used to select probiotic microorganisms, in vitro tests were performed to evaluate the behavior of the formulations in conditions mimicking the harsh gastric environment and the intestinal fluids. Our results indicate the high quality of the formulations in terms of the enumeration and identification of the contained organisms, as well as the absence of contaminants. Moreover, both products tolerated the acidic conditions well, with encapsulation providing further protection for the microorganisms. A good tolerance to the simulated artificial intestinal conditions was also evidenced for both preparations.Diletta MazzantiniFrancesco CelandroniMarco CalvigioniAdelaide PanattoniRoberto LabellaEmilia GhelardiMDPI AGarticleprobioticsqualityviable cellsidentificationgastrointestinal behaviorChemical technologyTP1-1185ENFoods, Vol 10, Iss 2781, p 2781 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic probiotics
quality
viable cells
identification
gastrointestinal behavior
Chemical technology
TP1-1185
spellingShingle probiotics
quality
viable cells
identification
gastrointestinal behavior
Chemical technology
TP1-1185
Diletta Mazzantini
Francesco Celandroni
Marco Calvigioni
Adelaide Panattoni
Roberto Labella
Emilia Ghelardi
Microbiological Quality and Resistance to an Artificial Gut Environment of Two Probiotic Formulations
description The quality control of probiotic products is the focus of numerous organizations worldwide. Several studies have highlighted the poor microbiological quality of many commercial probiotic formulations in terms of the identity of the contained microorganisms, viability, and purity, thus precluding the expected health benefits and representing a potential health risk for consumers. In this paper, we analyzed the contents of two probiotic formulations, one composed of an encapsulated mixture of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria, and one by a lyophilized yeast. The microorganisms contained in the products were quantified and identified using up-to-date methodologies, such as MALDI-TOF MS and metagenomic analysis. Moreover, as acid and bile tolerance is included among the criteria used to select probiotic microorganisms, in vitro tests were performed to evaluate the behavior of the formulations in conditions mimicking the harsh gastric environment and the intestinal fluids. Our results indicate the high quality of the formulations in terms of the enumeration and identification of the contained organisms, as well as the absence of contaminants. Moreover, both products tolerated the acidic conditions well, with encapsulation providing further protection for the microorganisms. A good tolerance to the simulated artificial intestinal conditions was also evidenced for both preparations.
format article
author Diletta Mazzantini
Francesco Celandroni
Marco Calvigioni
Adelaide Panattoni
Roberto Labella
Emilia Ghelardi
author_facet Diletta Mazzantini
Francesco Celandroni
Marco Calvigioni
Adelaide Panattoni
Roberto Labella
Emilia Ghelardi
author_sort Diletta Mazzantini
title Microbiological Quality and Resistance to an Artificial Gut Environment of Two Probiotic Formulations
title_short Microbiological Quality and Resistance to an Artificial Gut Environment of Two Probiotic Formulations
title_full Microbiological Quality and Resistance to an Artificial Gut Environment of Two Probiotic Formulations
title_fullStr Microbiological Quality and Resistance to an Artificial Gut Environment of Two Probiotic Formulations
title_full_unstemmed Microbiological Quality and Resistance to an Artificial Gut Environment of Two Probiotic Formulations
title_sort microbiological quality and resistance to an artificial gut environment of two probiotic formulations
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/a6724944e3f74eb083603ace93f1635d
work_keys_str_mv AT dilettamazzantini microbiologicalqualityandresistancetoanartificialgutenvironmentoftwoprobioticformulations
AT francescocelandroni microbiologicalqualityandresistancetoanartificialgutenvironmentoftwoprobioticformulations
AT marcocalvigioni microbiologicalqualityandresistancetoanartificialgutenvironmentoftwoprobioticformulations
AT adelaidepanattoni microbiologicalqualityandresistancetoanartificialgutenvironmentoftwoprobioticformulations
AT robertolabella microbiologicalqualityandresistancetoanartificialgutenvironmentoftwoprobioticformulations
AT emiliaghelardi microbiologicalqualityandresistancetoanartificialgutenvironmentoftwoprobioticformulations
_version_ 1718412185178210304