$Comparison of visual outcomes after implantation of diffractive trifocal toric intraocular lens and a diffractive apodized bifocal toric intraocular lens$
Código QR

Comparison of visual outcomes after implantation of diffractive trifocal toric intraocular lens and a diffractive apodized bifocal toric intraocular lens

Kjell Gunnar Gundersen,1 Rick Potvin2 1IFocus Øyeklinikk AS, Haugesund, Norway; 2Science in Vision, Akron, NY, USA Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare a new diffractive trifocal toric lens with an apodized diffractive bifocal toric lens in terms of refractive and visu...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Gundersen KG, Potvin R
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:	FineVision Restor astigmatism multifocal defocus curve contrast sensitivity Ophthalmology RE1-994
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/a676e3cf60c84a2eb2ed2547ff3ed6e4
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:a676e3cf60c84a2eb2ed2547ff3ed6e4
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:a676e3cf60c84a2eb2ed2547ff3ed6e42021-12-02T00:10:34ZComparison of visual outcomes after implantation of diffractive trifocal toric intraocular lens and a diffractive apodized bifocal toric intraocular lens1177-5483https://doaj.org/article/a676e3cf60c84a2eb2ed2547ff3ed6e42016-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/comparison-of-visual-outcomes-after-implantation-of-diffractive-trifoc-peer-reviewed-article-OPTHhttps://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483Kjell Gunnar Gundersen,1 Rick Potvin2 1IFocus Øyeklinikk AS, Haugesund, Norway; 2Science in Vision, Akron, NY, USA Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare a new diffractive trifocal toric lens with an apodized diffractive bifocal toric lens in terms of refractive and visual acuity (VA) outcomes, including low-contrast VA (LCVA), as well as the patient’s visual function 3 months after implantation. Patients and methods: This is a randomized prospective study involving bilateral implantation of a trifocal toric or a bifocal toric lens. At 3 months postoperatively, the subject’s vision was tested both uncorrected and with his/her best distance correction at: distance (4 m), intermediate (63 cm), and near (40 cm). Binocular defocus curves were measured with no correction and with the subject’s best distance correction in place. Quality of vision was measured using the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. Results: A total of 22 patients were enrolled (eleven in each group). There was no statistically significant difference in the absolute change in measured rotation between 1 month and 3 months postoperatively between the two intraocular lens (IOL) groups (P=0.98). At 3 months, the postoperative refraction and distance VA by eye were similar between groups. There was no statistically significant difference in the measured LCVA between groups (P=0.39). The defocus curve showed that at 67 cm, the trifocal toric lens had statistically significantly better VA when compared to the bifocal toric lens. There were no statistically significant differences by group for any of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire scores (P>0.26 in all cases). Conclusion: The trifocal toric IOL improved the intermediate vision without negatively impacting visual function and distance, near, or low-contrast VA when compared to a bifocal toric IOL. The toric component of the trifocal lens effectively reduced astigmatism and provided good rotational stability. Keywords: FineVision, ReSTOR, astigmatism, multifocal, defocus curve, contrast sensitivityGundersen KGPotvin RDove Medical PressarticleFineVisionRestorastigmatismmultifocaldefocus curvecontrast sensitivityOphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol 2016, Iss Issue 1, Pp 455-461 (2016)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	FineVision Restor astigmatism multifocal defocus curve contrast sensitivity Ophthalmology RE1-994
spellingShingle	FineVision Restor astigmatism multifocal defocus curve contrast sensitivity Ophthalmology RE1-994 Gundersen KG Potvin R Comparison of visual outcomes after implantation of diffractive trifocal toric intraocular lens and a diffractive apodized bifocal toric intraocular lens
description	Kjell Gunnar Gundersen,1 Rick Potvin2 1IFocus Øyeklinikk AS, Haugesund, Norway; 2Science in Vision, Akron, NY, USA Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare a new diffractive trifocal toric lens with an apodized diffractive bifocal toric lens in terms of refractive and visual acuity (VA) outcomes, including low-contrast VA (LCVA), as well as the patient’s visual function 3 months after implantation. Patients and methods: This is a randomized prospective study involving bilateral implantation of a trifocal toric or a bifocal toric lens. At 3 months postoperatively, the subject’s vision was tested both uncorrected and with his/her best distance correction at: distance (4 m), intermediate (63 cm), and near (40 cm). Binocular defocus curves were measured with no correction and with the subject’s best distance correction in place. Quality of vision was measured using the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. Results: A total of 22 patients were enrolled (eleven in each group). There was no statistically significant difference in the absolute change in measured rotation between 1 month and 3 months postoperatively between the two intraocular lens (IOL) groups (P=0.98). At 3 months, the postoperative refraction and distance VA by eye were similar between groups. There was no statistically significant difference in the measured LCVA between groups (P=0.39). The defocus curve showed that at 67 cm, the trifocal toric lens had statistically significantly better VA when compared to the bifocal toric lens. There were no statistically significant differences by group for any of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire scores (P>0.26 in all cases). Conclusion: The trifocal toric IOL improved the intermediate vision without negatively impacting visual function and distance, near, or low-contrast VA when compared to a bifocal toric IOL. The toric component of the trifocal lens effectively reduced astigmatism and provided good rotational stability. Keywords: FineVision, ReSTOR, astigmatism, multifocal, defocus curve, contrast sensitivity
format	article
author	Gundersen KG Potvin R
author_facet	Gundersen KG Potvin R
author_sort	Gundersen KG
title	Comparison of visual outcomes after implantation of diffractive trifocal toric intraocular lens and a diffractive apodized bifocal toric intraocular lens
title_short	Comparison of visual outcomes after implantation of diffractive trifocal toric intraocular lens and a diffractive apodized bifocal toric intraocular lens
title_full	Comparison of visual outcomes after implantation of diffractive trifocal toric intraocular lens and a diffractive apodized bifocal toric intraocular lens
title_fullStr	Comparison of visual outcomes after implantation of diffractive trifocal toric intraocular lens and a diffractive apodized bifocal toric intraocular lens
title_full_unstemmed	Comparison of visual outcomes after implantation of diffractive trifocal toric intraocular lens and a diffractive apodized bifocal toric intraocular lens
title_sort	comparison of visual outcomes after implantation of diffractive trifocal toric intraocular lens and a diffractive apodized bifocal toric intraocular lens
publisher	Dove Medical Press
publishDate	2016
url	https://doaj.org/article/a676e3cf60c84a2eb2ed2547ff3ed6e4
work_keys_str_mv	AT gundersenkg comparisonofvisualoutcomesafterimplantationofdiffractivetrifocaltoricintraocularlensandadiffractiveapodizedbifocaltoricintraocularlens AT potvinr comparisonofvisualoutcomesafterimplantationofdiffractivetrifocaltoricintraocularlensandadiffractiveapodizedbifocaltoricintraocularlens
_version_	1718403880913469440

Comparison of visual outcomes after implantation of diffractive trifocal toric intraocular lens and a diffractive apodized bifocal toric intraocular lens

Ejemplares similares