A study on the effectiveness of percolation ponds as a stormwater harvesting alternative for a semi-urban catchment

One of the challenges in urban stormwater management is to identify a suitable stormwater management method which will be socially, technologically and economically viable. In this paper, a study on the effectiveness of decentralized and interconnected percolation ponds as a stormwater harvesting te...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abhinav Wadhwa, Pavan Kumar Kummamuru
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: IWA Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/a69b31b066da4223bb5730e7db9fe21f
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:a69b31b066da4223bb5730e7db9fe21f
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:a69b31b066da4223bb5730e7db9fe21f2021-11-05T13:46:14ZA study on the effectiveness of percolation ponds as a stormwater harvesting alternative for a semi-urban catchment2709-80282709-803610.2166/aqua.2021.039https://doaj.org/article/a69b31b066da4223bb5730e7db9fe21f2021-03-01T00:00:00Zhttp://aqua.iwaponline.com/content/70/2/184https://doaj.org/toc/2709-8028https://doaj.org/toc/2709-8036One of the challenges in urban stormwater management is to identify a suitable stormwater management method which will be socially, technologically and economically viable. In this paper, a study on the effectiveness of decentralized and interconnected percolation ponds as a stormwater harvesting technology, for a partially urbanized (semi-urban) catchment is presented. When applied to a case study region in Katpadi, Tamil Nadu, the results were encouraging. The investment required for implementing the proposed stormwater harvesting came to be about ₹555 Million for Option I and ₹714 Million for Option II. The annual volume of water that can be added to the groundwater system through infiltration from the ponds was found to be 1.22 Mm3 in the case of Option I and 0.74 Mm3 in the case of Option II. The percentage area under stormwater harvesting for the entire catchment was found to be 6.14% under Option I and 9.36 under Option II. The hydrologic performance of the proposed stormwater harvesting system indicated that for peak runoff values Option II is more efficient (in terms of minimizing runoff volume) compared to Option I; however, for daily rainfall values, Option I is hydrologically more efficient when compared to Option II. HIGHLIGHTS Decentralized percolation pond arrangement at sub-catchment and sub-catchment unit level.; Series of interconnected percolation ponds for semi-urbanized catchment.; Adaptation of proposed percolation pond arrangement for a haphazard urban catchment unit.;Abhinav WadhwaPavan Kumar KummamuruIWA Publishingarticledecentralizationlow impact development (lid)stormwater harvesting techniquesurban hydrologyEnvironmental technology. Sanitary engineeringTD1-1066Environmental sciencesGE1-350ENAqua, Vol 70, Iss 2, Pp 184-201 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic decentralization
low impact development (lid)
stormwater harvesting techniques
urban hydrology
Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering
TD1-1066
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
spellingShingle decentralization
low impact development (lid)
stormwater harvesting techniques
urban hydrology
Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering
TD1-1066
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Abhinav Wadhwa
Pavan Kumar Kummamuru
A study on the effectiveness of percolation ponds as a stormwater harvesting alternative for a semi-urban catchment
description One of the challenges in urban stormwater management is to identify a suitable stormwater management method which will be socially, technologically and economically viable. In this paper, a study on the effectiveness of decentralized and interconnected percolation ponds as a stormwater harvesting technology, for a partially urbanized (semi-urban) catchment is presented. When applied to a case study region in Katpadi, Tamil Nadu, the results were encouraging. The investment required for implementing the proposed stormwater harvesting came to be about ₹555 Million for Option I and ₹714 Million for Option II. The annual volume of water that can be added to the groundwater system through infiltration from the ponds was found to be 1.22 Mm3 in the case of Option I and 0.74 Mm3 in the case of Option II. The percentage area under stormwater harvesting for the entire catchment was found to be 6.14% under Option I and 9.36 under Option II. The hydrologic performance of the proposed stormwater harvesting system indicated that for peak runoff values Option II is more efficient (in terms of minimizing runoff volume) compared to Option I; however, for daily rainfall values, Option I is hydrologically more efficient when compared to Option II. HIGHLIGHTS Decentralized percolation pond arrangement at sub-catchment and sub-catchment unit level.; Series of interconnected percolation ponds for semi-urbanized catchment.; Adaptation of proposed percolation pond arrangement for a haphazard urban catchment unit.;
format article
author Abhinav Wadhwa
Pavan Kumar Kummamuru
author_facet Abhinav Wadhwa
Pavan Kumar Kummamuru
author_sort Abhinav Wadhwa
title A study on the effectiveness of percolation ponds as a stormwater harvesting alternative for a semi-urban catchment
title_short A study on the effectiveness of percolation ponds as a stormwater harvesting alternative for a semi-urban catchment
title_full A study on the effectiveness of percolation ponds as a stormwater harvesting alternative for a semi-urban catchment
title_fullStr A study on the effectiveness of percolation ponds as a stormwater harvesting alternative for a semi-urban catchment
title_full_unstemmed A study on the effectiveness of percolation ponds as a stormwater harvesting alternative for a semi-urban catchment
title_sort study on the effectiveness of percolation ponds as a stormwater harvesting alternative for a semi-urban catchment
publisher IWA Publishing
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/a69b31b066da4223bb5730e7db9fe21f
work_keys_str_mv AT abhinavwadhwa astudyontheeffectivenessofpercolationpondsasastormwaterharvestingalternativeforasemiurbancatchment
AT pavankumarkummamuru astudyontheeffectivenessofpercolationpondsasastormwaterharvestingalternativeforasemiurbancatchment
AT abhinavwadhwa studyontheeffectivenessofpercolationpondsasastormwaterharvestingalternativeforasemiurbancatchment
AT pavankumarkummamuru studyontheeffectivenessofpercolationpondsasastormwaterharvestingalternativeforasemiurbancatchment
_version_ 1718444248626364416