A study on the effectiveness of percolation ponds as a stormwater harvesting alternative for a semi-urban catchment
One of the challenges in urban stormwater management is to identify a suitable stormwater management method which will be socially, technologically and economically viable. In this paper, a study on the effectiveness of decentralized and interconnected percolation ponds as a stormwater harvesting te...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
IWA Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/a69b31b066da4223bb5730e7db9fe21f |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:a69b31b066da4223bb5730e7db9fe21f |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:a69b31b066da4223bb5730e7db9fe21f2021-11-05T13:46:14ZA study on the effectiveness of percolation ponds as a stormwater harvesting alternative for a semi-urban catchment2709-80282709-803610.2166/aqua.2021.039https://doaj.org/article/a69b31b066da4223bb5730e7db9fe21f2021-03-01T00:00:00Zhttp://aqua.iwaponline.com/content/70/2/184https://doaj.org/toc/2709-8028https://doaj.org/toc/2709-8036One of the challenges in urban stormwater management is to identify a suitable stormwater management method which will be socially, technologically and economically viable. In this paper, a study on the effectiveness of decentralized and interconnected percolation ponds as a stormwater harvesting technology, for a partially urbanized (semi-urban) catchment is presented. When applied to a case study region in Katpadi, Tamil Nadu, the results were encouraging. The investment required for implementing the proposed stormwater harvesting came to be about ₹555 Million for Option I and ₹714 Million for Option II. The annual volume of water that can be added to the groundwater system through infiltration from the ponds was found to be 1.22 Mm3 in the case of Option I and 0.74 Mm3 in the case of Option II. The percentage area under stormwater harvesting for the entire catchment was found to be 6.14% under Option I and 9.36 under Option II. The hydrologic performance of the proposed stormwater harvesting system indicated that for peak runoff values Option II is more efficient (in terms of minimizing runoff volume) compared to Option I; however, for daily rainfall values, Option I is hydrologically more efficient when compared to Option II. HIGHLIGHTS Decentralized percolation pond arrangement at sub-catchment and sub-catchment unit level.; Series of interconnected percolation ponds for semi-urbanized catchment.; Adaptation of proposed percolation pond arrangement for a haphazard urban catchment unit.;Abhinav WadhwaPavan Kumar KummamuruIWA Publishingarticledecentralizationlow impact development (lid)stormwater harvesting techniquesurban hydrologyEnvironmental technology. Sanitary engineeringTD1-1066Environmental sciencesGE1-350ENAqua, Vol 70, Iss 2, Pp 184-201 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
decentralization low impact development (lid) stormwater harvesting techniques urban hydrology Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering TD1-1066 Environmental sciences GE1-350 |
spellingShingle |
decentralization low impact development (lid) stormwater harvesting techniques urban hydrology Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering TD1-1066 Environmental sciences GE1-350 Abhinav Wadhwa Pavan Kumar Kummamuru A study on the effectiveness of percolation ponds as a stormwater harvesting alternative for a semi-urban catchment |
description |
One of the challenges in urban stormwater management is to identify a suitable stormwater management method which will be socially, technologically and economically viable. In this paper, a study on the effectiveness of decentralized and interconnected percolation ponds as a stormwater harvesting technology, for a partially urbanized (semi-urban) catchment is presented. When applied to a case study region in Katpadi, Tamil Nadu, the results were encouraging. The investment required for implementing the proposed stormwater harvesting came to be about ₹555 Million for Option I and ₹714 Million for Option II. The annual volume of water that can be added to the groundwater system through infiltration from the ponds was found to be 1.22 Mm3 in the case of Option I and 0.74 Mm3 in the case of Option II. The percentage area under stormwater harvesting for the entire catchment was found to be 6.14% under Option I and 9.36 under Option II. The hydrologic performance of the proposed stormwater harvesting system indicated that for peak runoff values Option II is more efficient (in terms of minimizing runoff volume) compared to Option I; however, for daily rainfall values, Option I is hydrologically more efficient when compared to Option II. HIGHLIGHTS
Decentralized percolation pond arrangement at sub-catchment and sub-catchment unit level.;
Series of interconnected percolation ponds for semi-urbanized catchment.;
Adaptation of proposed percolation pond arrangement for a haphazard urban catchment unit.; |
format |
article |
author |
Abhinav Wadhwa Pavan Kumar Kummamuru |
author_facet |
Abhinav Wadhwa Pavan Kumar Kummamuru |
author_sort |
Abhinav Wadhwa |
title |
A study on the effectiveness of percolation ponds as a stormwater harvesting alternative for a semi-urban catchment |
title_short |
A study on the effectiveness of percolation ponds as a stormwater harvesting alternative for a semi-urban catchment |
title_full |
A study on the effectiveness of percolation ponds as a stormwater harvesting alternative for a semi-urban catchment |
title_fullStr |
A study on the effectiveness of percolation ponds as a stormwater harvesting alternative for a semi-urban catchment |
title_full_unstemmed |
A study on the effectiveness of percolation ponds as a stormwater harvesting alternative for a semi-urban catchment |
title_sort |
study on the effectiveness of percolation ponds as a stormwater harvesting alternative for a semi-urban catchment |
publisher |
IWA Publishing |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/a69b31b066da4223bb5730e7db9fe21f |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT abhinavwadhwa astudyontheeffectivenessofpercolationpondsasastormwaterharvestingalternativeforasemiurbancatchment AT pavankumarkummamuru astudyontheeffectivenessofpercolationpondsasastormwaterharvestingalternativeforasemiurbancatchment AT abhinavwadhwa studyontheeffectivenessofpercolationpondsasastormwaterharvestingalternativeforasemiurbancatchment AT pavankumarkummamuru studyontheeffectivenessofpercolationpondsasastormwaterharvestingalternativeforasemiurbancatchment |
_version_ |
1718444248626364416 |