Navigating policy dilemmas in fuel-subsidy reductions: learning from Indonesia’s experiences

Fuel subsidies are policy instruments that have historically been used to assist the poor in affording energy for essential household activities. The subventions have, however, been the subject of considerable criticism that they in practice exacerbate inequalities and enrich fuel producers and well...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muhamad Rosyid Jazuli, Ine Steenmans, Yacob Mulugetta
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/a6ad0110d3b44a4180060f05cc59a095
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:a6ad0110d3b44a4180060f05cc59a095
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:a6ad0110d3b44a4180060f05cc59a0952021-12-01T14:40:58ZNavigating policy dilemmas in fuel-subsidy reductions: learning from Indonesia’s experiences1548-773310.1080/15487733.2021.2002024https://doaj.org/article/a6ad0110d3b44a4180060f05cc59a0952021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2021.2002024https://doaj.org/toc/1548-7733Fuel subsidies are policy instruments that have historically been used to assist the poor in affording energy for essential household activities. The subventions have, however, been the subject of considerable criticism that they in practice exacerbate inequalities and enrich fuel producers and well-to-do households that do not require support from fuel subsidies. When efforts to resolve tensions across different stakeholder needs lead to unintended, undesirable, and differential impacts across groups and across different time horizons, a policy dilemma emerges. Actors looking to understand or inform fuel-subsidy reform face an analytical challenge in knowing how to effectively frame important interlinkages and identify strategies for intervention. This policy brief responds to this analytical challenge in understanding interlinkages that frame these policy dilemmas by using John Kingdon’s multiple-policy stream framework to analyze how the Indonesian government navigated its energy subsidy reform policy dilemma during 1998–2016. It shares lessons on how the country has managed this situation and discusses implications for further domestic reforms. The Indonesian experience may provide useful insights and lessons for other developing countries looking to navigate the multiple interlinkages across fuel-subsidy dilemmas.Muhamad Rosyid JazuliIne SteenmansYacob MulugettaTaylor & Francis Grouparticlefuel-subsidy reformpolicy dilemmaindonesiareform policyproblem structuringSocial sciences (General)H1-99ENSustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, Vol 17, Iss 1, Pp 391-403 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic fuel-subsidy reform
policy dilemma
indonesia
reform policy
problem structuring
Social sciences (General)
H1-99
spellingShingle fuel-subsidy reform
policy dilemma
indonesia
reform policy
problem structuring
Social sciences (General)
H1-99
Muhamad Rosyid Jazuli
Ine Steenmans
Yacob Mulugetta
Navigating policy dilemmas in fuel-subsidy reductions: learning from Indonesia’s experiences
description Fuel subsidies are policy instruments that have historically been used to assist the poor in affording energy for essential household activities. The subventions have, however, been the subject of considerable criticism that they in practice exacerbate inequalities and enrich fuel producers and well-to-do households that do not require support from fuel subsidies. When efforts to resolve tensions across different stakeholder needs lead to unintended, undesirable, and differential impacts across groups and across different time horizons, a policy dilemma emerges. Actors looking to understand or inform fuel-subsidy reform face an analytical challenge in knowing how to effectively frame important interlinkages and identify strategies for intervention. This policy brief responds to this analytical challenge in understanding interlinkages that frame these policy dilemmas by using John Kingdon’s multiple-policy stream framework to analyze how the Indonesian government navigated its energy subsidy reform policy dilemma during 1998–2016. It shares lessons on how the country has managed this situation and discusses implications for further domestic reforms. The Indonesian experience may provide useful insights and lessons for other developing countries looking to navigate the multiple interlinkages across fuel-subsidy dilemmas.
format article
author Muhamad Rosyid Jazuli
Ine Steenmans
Yacob Mulugetta
author_facet Muhamad Rosyid Jazuli
Ine Steenmans
Yacob Mulugetta
author_sort Muhamad Rosyid Jazuli
title Navigating policy dilemmas in fuel-subsidy reductions: learning from Indonesia’s experiences
title_short Navigating policy dilemmas in fuel-subsidy reductions: learning from Indonesia’s experiences
title_full Navigating policy dilemmas in fuel-subsidy reductions: learning from Indonesia’s experiences
title_fullStr Navigating policy dilemmas in fuel-subsidy reductions: learning from Indonesia’s experiences
title_full_unstemmed Navigating policy dilemmas in fuel-subsidy reductions: learning from Indonesia’s experiences
title_sort navigating policy dilemmas in fuel-subsidy reductions: learning from indonesia’s experiences
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/a6ad0110d3b44a4180060f05cc59a095
work_keys_str_mv AT muhamadrosyidjazuli navigatingpolicydilemmasinfuelsubsidyreductionslearningfromindonesiasexperiences
AT inesteenmans navigatingpolicydilemmasinfuelsubsidyreductionslearningfromindonesiasexperiences
AT yacobmulugetta navigatingpolicydilemmasinfuelsubsidyreductionslearningfromindonesiasexperiences
_version_ 1718405011577241600