Navigating policy dilemmas in fuel-subsidy reductions: learning from Indonesia’s experiences
Fuel subsidies are policy instruments that have historically been used to assist the poor in affording energy for essential household activities. The subventions have, however, been the subject of considerable criticism that they in practice exacerbate inequalities and enrich fuel producers and well...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/a6ad0110d3b44a4180060f05cc59a095 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:a6ad0110d3b44a4180060f05cc59a095 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:a6ad0110d3b44a4180060f05cc59a0952021-12-01T14:40:58ZNavigating policy dilemmas in fuel-subsidy reductions: learning from Indonesia’s experiences1548-773310.1080/15487733.2021.2002024https://doaj.org/article/a6ad0110d3b44a4180060f05cc59a0952021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2021.2002024https://doaj.org/toc/1548-7733Fuel subsidies are policy instruments that have historically been used to assist the poor in affording energy for essential household activities. The subventions have, however, been the subject of considerable criticism that they in practice exacerbate inequalities and enrich fuel producers and well-to-do households that do not require support from fuel subsidies. When efforts to resolve tensions across different stakeholder needs lead to unintended, undesirable, and differential impacts across groups and across different time horizons, a policy dilemma emerges. Actors looking to understand or inform fuel-subsidy reform face an analytical challenge in knowing how to effectively frame important interlinkages and identify strategies for intervention. This policy brief responds to this analytical challenge in understanding interlinkages that frame these policy dilemmas by using John Kingdon’s multiple-policy stream framework to analyze how the Indonesian government navigated its energy subsidy reform policy dilemma during 1998–2016. It shares lessons on how the country has managed this situation and discusses implications for further domestic reforms. The Indonesian experience may provide useful insights and lessons for other developing countries looking to navigate the multiple interlinkages across fuel-subsidy dilemmas.Muhamad Rosyid JazuliIne SteenmansYacob MulugettaTaylor & Francis Grouparticlefuel-subsidy reformpolicy dilemmaindonesiareform policyproblem structuringSocial sciences (General)H1-99ENSustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, Vol 17, Iss 1, Pp 391-403 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
fuel-subsidy reform policy dilemma indonesia reform policy problem structuring Social sciences (General) H1-99 |
spellingShingle |
fuel-subsidy reform policy dilemma indonesia reform policy problem structuring Social sciences (General) H1-99 Muhamad Rosyid Jazuli Ine Steenmans Yacob Mulugetta Navigating policy dilemmas in fuel-subsidy reductions: learning from Indonesia’s experiences |
description |
Fuel subsidies are policy instruments that have historically been used to assist the poor in affording energy for essential household activities. The subventions have, however, been the subject of considerable criticism that they in practice exacerbate inequalities and enrich fuel producers and well-to-do households that do not require support from fuel subsidies. When efforts to resolve tensions across different stakeholder needs lead to unintended, undesirable, and differential impacts across groups and across different time horizons, a policy dilemma emerges. Actors looking to understand or inform fuel-subsidy reform face an analytical challenge in knowing how to effectively frame important interlinkages and identify strategies for intervention. This policy brief responds to this analytical challenge in understanding interlinkages that frame these policy dilemmas by using John Kingdon’s multiple-policy stream framework to analyze how the Indonesian government navigated its energy subsidy reform policy dilemma during 1998–2016. It shares lessons on how the country has managed this situation and discusses implications for further domestic reforms. The Indonesian experience may provide useful insights and lessons for other developing countries looking to navigate the multiple interlinkages across fuel-subsidy dilemmas. |
format |
article |
author |
Muhamad Rosyid Jazuli Ine Steenmans Yacob Mulugetta |
author_facet |
Muhamad Rosyid Jazuli Ine Steenmans Yacob Mulugetta |
author_sort |
Muhamad Rosyid Jazuli |
title |
Navigating policy dilemmas in fuel-subsidy reductions: learning from Indonesia’s experiences |
title_short |
Navigating policy dilemmas in fuel-subsidy reductions: learning from Indonesia’s experiences |
title_full |
Navigating policy dilemmas in fuel-subsidy reductions: learning from Indonesia’s experiences |
title_fullStr |
Navigating policy dilemmas in fuel-subsidy reductions: learning from Indonesia’s experiences |
title_full_unstemmed |
Navigating policy dilemmas in fuel-subsidy reductions: learning from Indonesia’s experiences |
title_sort |
navigating policy dilemmas in fuel-subsidy reductions: learning from indonesia’s experiences |
publisher |
Taylor & Francis Group |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/a6ad0110d3b44a4180060f05cc59a095 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT muhamadrosyidjazuli navigatingpolicydilemmasinfuelsubsidyreductionslearningfromindonesiasexperiences AT inesteenmans navigatingpolicydilemmasinfuelsubsidyreductionslearningfromindonesiasexperiences AT yacobmulugetta navigatingpolicydilemmasinfuelsubsidyreductionslearningfromindonesiasexperiences |
_version_ |
1718405011577241600 |