Prospective evaluation and classification of endoscopic findings for ureteral calculi

Abstract Difficulty in performing ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL) depends on endoscopic findings surrounding calculi. In this multicentre prospective cohort study of 185 patients with a single ureteral stone who underwent ureteroscopic lithotripsy registered in the SMART study between January 2014...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shuzo Hamamoto, Shinsuke Okada, Takaaki Inoue, Teruaki Sugino, Rei Unno, Kazumi Taguchi, Ryosuke Ando, Atsushi Okada, Hiroyasu Miura, Tadashi Matsuda, Takahiro Yasui
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2020
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/a6b4178eb23741a7a1765510043fe34c
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:a6b4178eb23741a7a1765510043fe34c
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:a6b4178eb23741a7a1765510043fe34c2021-12-02T16:26:21ZProspective evaluation and classification of endoscopic findings for ureteral calculi10.1038/s41598-020-69158-w2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/a6b4178eb23741a7a1765510043fe34c2020-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69158-whttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Difficulty in performing ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL) depends on endoscopic findings surrounding calculi. In this multicentre prospective cohort study of 185 patients with a single ureteral stone who underwent ureteroscopic lithotripsy registered in the SMART study between January 2014 and February 2017, we established a classification of endoscopic findings and analysed risk factors for ureteral changes. We evaluated endoscopic findings (oedema, polyps, ureteral mucosa-stone adherence, and distal ureteric tightness) based on the SMART classification. Operative time and ureteral injuries were significantly correlated with endoscopic finding grades. Multivariate analyses revealed that mucosa-stone adherence (MSA) was strongly affected by hydronephrosis grade (odds ratio, 12.4; p = 0.022) and the interval before surgery (odds ratio, 1.10; p = 0.012). The cutoff value for MSA was 98 days, with a predictive accuracy of 0.78. Risk factors for distal ureteric tightness were age (odds ratio, 0.96; p = 0.004) and early intervention (odds ratio, 0.90; p = 0.023). The cutoff value was 34 days, with a predictive accuracy of 0.72. In conclusion, appropriate intervention around 34 days (limited to 98 days) after symptom onset is necessary for treating ureteral calculi. Even if intervention passed 98 days post-symptom onset, staged URSL, alternative procedures, and detailed informed consent should be planned in advance, assuming strong MSA.Shuzo HamamotoShinsuke OkadaTakaaki InoueTeruaki SuginoRei UnnoKazumi TaguchiRyosuke AndoAtsushi OkadaHiroyasu MiuraTadashi MatsudaTakahiro YasuiNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Shuzo Hamamoto
Shinsuke Okada
Takaaki Inoue
Teruaki Sugino
Rei Unno
Kazumi Taguchi
Ryosuke Ando
Atsushi Okada
Hiroyasu Miura
Tadashi Matsuda
Takahiro Yasui
Prospective evaluation and classification of endoscopic findings for ureteral calculi
description Abstract Difficulty in performing ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL) depends on endoscopic findings surrounding calculi. In this multicentre prospective cohort study of 185 patients with a single ureteral stone who underwent ureteroscopic lithotripsy registered in the SMART study between January 2014 and February 2017, we established a classification of endoscopic findings and analysed risk factors for ureteral changes. We evaluated endoscopic findings (oedema, polyps, ureteral mucosa-stone adherence, and distal ureteric tightness) based on the SMART classification. Operative time and ureteral injuries were significantly correlated with endoscopic finding grades. Multivariate analyses revealed that mucosa-stone adherence (MSA) was strongly affected by hydronephrosis grade (odds ratio, 12.4; p = 0.022) and the interval before surgery (odds ratio, 1.10; p = 0.012). The cutoff value for MSA was 98 days, with a predictive accuracy of 0.78. Risk factors for distal ureteric tightness were age (odds ratio, 0.96; p = 0.004) and early intervention (odds ratio, 0.90; p = 0.023). The cutoff value was 34 days, with a predictive accuracy of 0.72. In conclusion, appropriate intervention around 34 days (limited to 98 days) after symptom onset is necessary for treating ureteral calculi. Even if intervention passed 98 days post-symptom onset, staged URSL, alternative procedures, and detailed informed consent should be planned in advance, assuming strong MSA.
format article
author Shuzo Hamamoto
Shinsuke Okada
Takaaki Inoue
Teruaki Sugino
Rei Unno
Kazumi Taguchi
Ryosuke Ando
Atsushi Okada
Hiroyasu Miura
Tadashi Matsuda
Takahiro Yasui
author_facet Shuzo Hamamoto
Shinsuke Okada
Takaaki Inoue
Teruaki Sugino
Rei Unno
Kazumi Taguchi
Ryosuke Ando
Atsushi Okada
Hiroyasu Miura
Tadashi Matsuda
Takahiro Yasui
author_sort Shuzo Hamamoto
title Prospective evaluation and classification of endoscopic findings for ureteral calculi
title_short Prospective evaluation and classification of endoscopic findings for ureteral calculi
title_full Prospective evaluation and classification of endoscopic findings for ureteral calculi
title_fullStr Prospective evaluation and classification of endoscopic findings for ureteral calculi
title_full_unstemmed Prospective evaluation and classification of endoscopic findings for ureteral calculi
title_sort prospective evaluation and classification of endoscopic findings for ureteral calculi
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/a6b4178eb23741a7a1765510043fe34c
work_keys_str_mv AT shuzohamamoto prospectiveevaluationandclassificationofendoscopicfindingsforureteralcalculi
AT shinsukeokada prospectiveevaluationandclassificationofendoscopicfindingsforureteralcalculi
AT takaakiinoue prospectiveevaluationandclassificationofendoscopicfindingsforureteralcalculi
AT teruakisugino prospectiveevaluationandclassificationofendoscopicfindingsforureteralcalculi
AT reiunno prospectiveevaluationandclassificationofendoscopicfindingsforureteralcalculi
AT kazumitaguchi prospectiveevaluationandclassificationofendoscopicfindingsforureteralcalculi
AT ryosukeando prospectiveevaluationandclassificationofendoscopicfindingsforureteralcalculi
AT atsushiokada prospectiveevaluationandclassificationofendoscopicfindingsforureteralcalculi
AT hiroyasumiura prospectiveevaluationandclassificationofendoscopicfindingsforureteralcalculi
AT tadashimatsuda prospectiveevaluationandclassificationofendoscopicfindingsforureteralcalculi
AT takahiroyasui prospectiveevaluationandclassificationofendoscopicfindingsforureteralcalculi
_version_ 1718384072510668800