A note on the punctuated nature of movement paths
This paper addresses the question of how a moving item affects the nodes that lie along the path of movement. In particular, we are concerned with the question whether all nodes along the path of movement are affected in the same way or not. We first observe that most arguments that have been given...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | article |
| Language: | CA EN |
| Published: |
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
2009
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doaj.org/article/a6d9c164cc6b4d36b611c7e0148bbeb7 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | This paper addresses the question of how a moving item affects the nodes that lie along the path of movement. In particular, we are concerned with the question whether all nodes along the path of movement are affected in the same way or not. We first observe that most arguments that have been given to support the existence of intermediate reconstruction sites do not bear on this issue. We then discuss the logic of what a true argument would look like. Finally, we present three case studies. Two of them (A-reconstruction in Norwegian and VP-ellipsis in Dutch) provide prima facie arguments in favor of a position along the lines of Chomsky (1973, 1986, 2000), where some but not all nodes along the path of movement are affected by movement. |
|---|