A call for conservation scientists to empirically study the effects of human population policies on biodiversity loss

The world is changing more quickly now than it ever has before, predominantly due to our large consumption rates and population size. Despite this epoch being well-accepted as the 'Anthropocene', it is surprising that there is still a lack of willingness by many conservation scientists to...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Niki Rust, Laura Kehoe
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	The White Horse Press 2017
Materias:	family planning fertility overconsumption overpopulation population growth population health and environment Environmental sciences GE1-350 Demography. Population. Vital events HB848-3697
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/a6e06314374a46b3968c1c73bf86025c
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:a6e06314374a46b3968c1c73bf86025c
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:a6e06314374a46b3968c1c73bf86025c2021-12-02T17:50:22ZA call for conservation scientists to empirically study the effects of human population policies on biodiversity loss2398-54882398-5496https://doaj.org/article/a6e06314374a46b3968c1c73bf86025c2017-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://whp-journals.co.uk/JPS/article/view/614https://doaj.org/toc/2398-5488https://doaj.org/toc/2398-5496 The world is changing more quickly now than it ever has before, predominantly due to our large consumption rates and population size. Despite this epoch being well-accepted as the 'Anthropocene', it is surprising that there is still a lack of willingness by many conservation scientists to engage with the consequences of human population dynamics on biodiversity. We highlight the importance of addressing the effects of our population abundance, density and growth rate on conservation and note that environmental organisations are beginning to embrace this problem but the take-up amongst conservation researchers to empirically study their effect on biodiversity is slow. We argue that the lack of published research may partly be because the topic is still considered taboo. We therefore urge conservation scientists to direct more of their research efforts on this issue, particularly to examples that highlight the effects of Population, Health and Environment (PHE) projects and female education initiatives on biodiversity. Niki RustLaura KehoeThe White Horse Pressarticlefamily planningfertilityoverconsumptionoverpopulationpopulation growthpopulation health and environmentEnvironmental sciencesGE1-350Demography. Population. Vital eventsHB848-3697ENThe Journal of Population and Sustainability, Vol 1, Iss 2 (2017)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	family planning fertility overconsumption overpopulation population growth population health and environment Environmental sciences GE1-350 Demography. Population. Vital events HB848-3697
spellingShingle	family planning fertility overconsumption overpopulation population growth population health and environment Environmental sciences GE1-350 Demography. Population. Vital events HB848-3697 Niki Rust Laura Kehoe A call for conservation scientists to empirically study the effects of human population policies on biodiversity loss
description	The world is changing more quickly now than it ever has before, predominantly due to our large consumption rates and population size. Despite this epoch being well-accepted as the 'Anthropocene', it is surprising that there is still a lack of willingness by many conservation scientists to engage with the consequences of human population dynamics on biodiversity. We highlight the importance of addressing the effects of our population abundance, density and growth rate on conservation and note that environmental organisations are beginning to embrace this problem but the take-up amongst conservation researchers to empirically study their effect on biodiversity is slow. We argue that the lack of published research may partly be because the topic is still considered taboo. We therefore urge conservation scientists to direct more of their research efforts on this issue, particularly to examples that highlight the effects of Population, Health and Environment (PHE) projects and female education initiatives on biodiversity.
format	article
author	Niki Rust Laura Kehoe
author_facet	Niki Rust Laura Kehoe
author_sort	Niki Rust
title	A call for conservation scientists to empirically study the effects of human population policies on biodiversity loss
title_short	A call for conservation scientists to empirically study the effects of human population policies on biodiversity loss
title_full	A call for conservation scientists to empirically study the effects of human population policies on biodiversity loss
title_fullStr	A call for conservation scientists to empirically study the effects of human population policies on biodiversity loss
title_full_unstemmed	A call for conservation scientists to empirically study the effects of human population policies on biodiversity loss
title_sort	call for conservation scientists to empirically study the effects of human population policies on biodiversity loss
publisher	The White Horse Press
publishDate	2017
url	https://doaj.org/article/a6e06314374a46b3968c1c73bf86025c
work_keys_str_mv	AT nikirust acallforconservationscientiststoempiricallystudytheeffectsofhumanpopulationpoliciesonbiodiversityloss AT laurakehoe acallforconservationscientiststoempiricallystudytheeffectsofhumanpopulationpoliciesonbiodiversityloss AT nikirust callforconservationscientiststoempiricallystudytheeffectsofhumanpopulationpoliciesonbiodiversityloss AT laurakehoe callforconservationscientiststoempiricallystudytheeffectsofhumanpopulationpoliciesonbiodiversityloss
_version_	1718379369027600384

A call for conservation scientists to empirically study the effects of human population policies on biodiversity loss

Ejemplares similares