Climate change curriculum infusion project: An educational initiative at one U.S. medical school

Background: Climate change is considered the greatest threat and opportunity to health of the 21st century and medical schools are seeking effective ways to teach relevant climate change competencies in an already crowded medical curriculum. Objective: Describe the Climate Change Curriculum Infusion...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sophie Karwoska Kligler, Lindsay Clark, Christian Cayon, Nina Prescott, Jill K Gregory, Perry E Sheffield
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/a6e50652782a4b7aa51deac017f30fc1
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Descripción
Sumario:Background: Climate change is considered the greatest threat and opportunity to health of the 21st century and medical schools are seeking effective ways to teach relevant climate change competencies in an already crowded medical curriculum. Objective: Describe the Climate Change Curriculum Infusion Project (CCCIP) at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (ISMMS) and summarize results of two phases of evaluation assessing student perceptions and visibility of the CCCIP curriculum three years after its inception. Methods: CCCIP content was mapped to medical and climate and health competencies. Content was designed in conjunction with institutional staff and faculty. Data was collected in two phases (Summer 2018, Fall 2020) utilizing anonymous, online surveys distributed to medical students who had participated in at least one year of the CCCIP curriculum. Results: The CCCIP integrates climate change and health content (30+ slides across 6 courses) with minimal disruption (< 1-hour total content) to the existing preclinical curriculum. The majority of students agreed or strongly agreed that the CCCIP infusion content was appropriate for the class (88%), was effectively organized (82%), gave them a deeper insight into the topic (77%), and helped them to better understand the links between climate change and health (88%). However, a majority of students remembered climate-related content poorly throughout their first (78%) and second year (83%), and 62% felt that climate-related curriculum content at ISMMS did not meet their expectations. Conclusions: CCCIP demonstrates a feasible preliminary approach to integrating climate content into medical preclinical education. Students largely understand the value of climate change material and are open to its inclusion in the preclinical curriculum. However, curricular enhancements are needed to meet project goals in terms of curricular visibility and effectiveness.