Recommandations linguistiques et habitudes langagières et protocolaires à l’usage des Europén.ne.s (ou d’usage uniquement en Europe ?). Écart entre la norme écrite et la norme en usage. Étude de cas : Glossaire du langage « sensible » pour la communication interne et externe (PE, 2020)/Recommendations regarding the Linguistic Practice and Behavior in (only?) European Societies. A Gap between the Written Standard and the Spoken Varieties. Case Study: French and Romanian Version of the Glossary of Sensitive Language for Internal and External Communications (PE, 2020)

This paper deals with political (in)correctness in translation. The primary purpose of our paper is to emphasize the politically correct notions recommended or contraindicated in the Glossary of Sensitive Language for Internal and External Communications (PE, 2020). We examine the equivalence of off...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Georgiana I. Badea, Lavinia-Maria Tec
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN FR RO
Publicado:	Editura Universității „Alexandru Ioan Cuza” din Iași 2021
Materias:	legal linguistics political correctness in translation legal acculturation Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence K1-7720
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/a6eaba74a4e94973943b9747702c35a3
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:a6eaba74a4e94973943b9747702c35a3
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:a6eaba74a4e94973943b9747702c35a32021-12-02T06:00:19ZRecommandations linguistiques et habitudes langagières et protocolaires à l’usage des Europén.ne.s (ou d’usage uniquement en Europe ?). Écart entre la norme écrite et la norme en usage. Étude de cas : Glossaire du langage « sensible » pour la communication interne et externe (PE, 2020)/Recommendations regarding the Linguistic Practice and Behavior in (only?) European Societies. A Gap between the Written Standard and the Spoken Varieties. Case Study: French and Romanian Version of the Glossary of Sensitive Language for Internal and External Communications (PE, 2020)10.47743/jss-2021-67-3-81221-84642537-3048https://doaj.org/article/a6eaba74a4e94973943b9747702c35a32021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://pub.law.uaic.ro/ro/volume-publicate/2021/analele-uaic-tomul-lxvii-tiine-juridice-supliment/georgiana-i.-badea-lavinia-maria-techttps://doaj.org/toc/1221-8464https://doaj.org/toc/2537-3048This paper deals with political (in)correctness in translation. The primary purpose of our paper is to emphasize the politically correct notions recommended or contraindicated in the Glossary of Sensitive Language for Internal and External Communications (PE, 2020). We examine the equivalence of official versions into French and Romanian in order to understand how words that have become politically correct are substituted by politically in.correct notions.Georgiana I. BadeaLavinia-Maria TecEditura Universității „Alexandru Ioan Cuza” din Iașiarticlelegal linguisticspolitical correctness in translationlegal acculturationLaw in general. Comparative and uniform law. JurisprudenceK1-7720ENFRROAnalele Ştiinţifice ale Universităţii "Al.I. Cuza" din Iaşi. Ştiinţe Juridice, Vol 67, Iss 3, Pp 101-120 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN FR RO
topic	legal linguistics political correctness in translation legal acculturation Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence K1-7720
spellingShingle	legal linguistics political correctness in translation legal acculturation Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence K1-7720 Georgiana I. Badea Lavinia-Maria Tec Recommandations linguistiques et habitudes langagières et protocolaires à l’usage des Europén.ne.s (ou d’usage uniquement en Europe ?). Écart entre la norme écrite et la norme en usage. Étude de cas : Glossaire du langage « sensible » pour la communication interne et externe (PE, 2020)/Recommendations regarding the Linguistic Practice and Behavior in (only?) European Societies. A Gap between the Written Standard and the Spoken Varieties. Case Study: French and Romanian Version of the Glossary of Sensitive Language for Internal and External Communications (PE, 2020)
description	This paper deals with political (in)correctness in translation. The primary purpose of our paper is to emphasize the politically correct notions recommended or contraindicated in the Glossary of Sensitive Language for Internal and External Communications (PE, 2020). We examine the equivalence of official versions into French and Romanian in order to understand how words that have become politically correct are substituted by politically in.correct notions.
format	article
author	Georgiana I. Badea Lavinia-Maria Tec
author_facet	Georgiana I. Badea Lavinia-Maria Tec
author_sort	Georgiana I. Badea
title	Recommandations linguistiques et habitudes langagières et protocolaires à l’usage des Europén.ne.s (ou d’usage uniquement en Europe ?). Écart entre la norme écrite et la norme en usage. Étude de cas : Glossaire du langage « sensible » pour la communication interne et externe (PE, 2020)/Recommendations regarding the Linguistic Practice and Behavior in (only?) European Societies. A Gap between the Written Standard and the Spoken Varieties. Case Study: French and Romanian Version of the Glossary of Sensitive Language for Internal and External Communications (PE, 2020)
title_short	Recommandations linguistiques et habitudes langagières et protocolaires à l’usage des Europén.ne.s (ou d’usage uniquement en Europe ?). Écart entre la norme écrite et la norme en usage. Étude de cas : Glossaire du langage « sensible » pour la communication interne et externe (PE, 2020)/Recommendations regarding the Linguistic Practice and Behavior in (only?) European Societies. A Gap between the Written Standard and the Spoken Varieties. Case Study: French and Romanian Version of the Glossary of Sensitive Language for Internal and External Communications (PE, 2020)
title_full	Recommandations linguistiques et habitudes langagières et protocolaires à l’usage des Europén.ne.s (ou d’usage uniquement en Europe ?). Écart entre la norme écrite et la norme en usage. Étude de cas : Glossaire du langage « sensible » pour la communication interne et externe (PE, 2020)/Recommendations regarding the Linguistic Practice and Behavior in (only?) European Societies. A Gap between the Written Standard and the Spoken Varieties. Case Study: French and Romanian Version of the Glossary of Sensitive Language for Internal and External Communications (PE, 2020)
title_fullStr	Recommandations linguistiques et habitudes langagières et protocolaires à l’usage des Europén.ne.s (ou d’usage uniquement en Europe ?). Écart entre la norme écrite et la norme en usage. Étude de cas : Glossaire du langage « sensible » pour la communication interne et externe (PE, 2020)/Recommendations regarding the Linguistic Practice and Behavior in (only?) European Societies. A Gap between the Written Standard and the Spoken Varieties. Case Study: French and Romanian Version of the Glossary of Sensitive Language for Internal and External Communications (PE, 2020)
title_full_unstemmed	Recommandations linguistiques et habitudes langagières et protocolaires à l’usage des Europén.ne.s (ou d’usage uniquement en Europe ?). Écart entre la norme écrite et la norme en usage. Étude de cas : Glossaire du langage « sensible » pour la communication interne et externe (PE, 2020)/Recommendations regarding the Linguistic Practice and Behavior in (only?) European Societies. A Gap between the Written Standard and the Spoken Varieties. Case Study: French and Romanian Version of the Glossary of Sensitive Language for Internal and External Communications (PE, 2020)
title_sort	recommandations linguistiques et habitudes langagières et protocolaires à l’usage des europén.ne.s (ou d’usage uniquement en europe ?). écart entre la norme écrite et la norme en usage. étude de cas : glossaire du langage « sensible » pour la communication interne et externe (pe, 2020)/recommendations regarding the linguistic practice and behavior in (only?) european societies. a gap between the written standard and the spoken varieties. case study: french and romanian version of the glossary of sensitive language for internal and external communications (pe, 2020)
publisher	Editura Universității „Alexandru Ioan Cuza” din Iași
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/a6eaba74a4e94973943b9747702c35a3
work_keys_str_mv	AT georgianaibadea recommandationslinguistiquesethabitudeslangagieresetprotocolairesalusagedeseuropennesoudusageuniquementeneuropeecartentrelanormeecriteetlanormeenusageetudedecasglossairedulangagesensiblepourlacommunicationinterneetexternepe2020recommendationsregardingthel AT laviniamariatec recommandationslinguistiquesethabitudeslangagieresetprotocolairesalusagedeseuropennesoudusageuniquementeneuropeecartentrelanormeecriteetlanormeenusageetudedecasglossairedulangagesensiblepourlacommunicationinterneetexternepe2020recommendationsregardingthel
_version_	1718400126942183424

Ejemplares similares