Analysis of Endoscopic Evaluation Reliability for Ulcerative Colitis in Histological Remission
The Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) is a major endoscopic scoring system used to assign a status of mucosal inflammation and disease activity to patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Using interobserver reliability (IOR), this study clarified the difficulties for endoscopic observers imposed by MES...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/a71402d343f14ecabdd37a582e2e8d02 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:a71402d343f14ecabdd37a582e2e8d02 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:a71402d343f14ecabdd37a582e2e8d022021-11-25T17:43:30ZAnalysis of Endoscopic Evaluation Reliability for Ulcerative Colitis in Histological Remission10.3390/healthcare91114052227-9032https://doaj.org/article/a71402d343f14ecabdd37a582e2e8d022021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/9/11/1405https://doaj.org/toc/2227-9032The Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) is a major endoscopic scoring system used to assign a status of mucosal inflammation and disease activity to patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Using interobserver reliability (IOR), this study clarified the difficulties for endoscopic observers imposed by MES parameters used for the endoscopic evaluation of UC in histological remission. First, 42 endoscopists of four observer groups examined each MES parameter, which were evaluated from endoscopically obtained images of 100 cases as Grade 0 or 1 of the Nancy histological index of histopathological inflammation. Then, IOR was assessed using multiple κ statistics for each finding of MES. The results showed that IOR among all the observers was slight or fair for all the parameters, indicating a low IOR. The experts of the UC practice group had “moderate” or higher IOR for seven of the nine parameters, whereas “slight” or “fair” results were found for all parameters by the trainee group. The IOR for each MES parameter was calculated separately for the observer groups. All the groups showed “slight” or “fair” for “Erythema” and “Decreased vascular pattern”. Large differences between the endoscopists were found in the IOR for the MES parameters in UC in histological remission. Even among UC practice experts, the IOR was low for “Erythema” and “Decreased vascular pattern”.Mimari KanazawaKeiichi TominagaAkira YamamiyaTakanao TanakaShoko WatanabeTakeshi SugayaKeiichiro AbeAkira KanamoriTakahiro ArisakaKoki HoshiMakoto IijimaKenichi GodaYasuo HaruyamaAtsushi IrisawaMDPI AGarticleendoscopic remissionhistological remissioninterobserver reliabilityMayo endoscopic subscoreulcerative colitisMedicineRENHealthcare, Vol 9, Iss 1405, p 1405 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
endoscopic remission histological remission interobserver reliability Mayo endoscopic subscore ulcerative colitis Medicine R |
spellingShingle |
endoscopic remission histological remission interobserver reliability Mayo endoscopic subscore ulcerative colitis Medicine R Mimari Kanazawa Keiichi Tominaga Akira Yamamiya Takanao Tanaka Shoko Watanabe Takeshi Sugaya Keiichiro Abe Akira Kanamori Takahiro Arisaka Koki Hoshi Makoto Iijima Kenichi Goda Yasuo Haruyama Atsushi Irisawa Analysis of Endoscopic Evaluation Reliability for Ulcerative Colitis in Histological Remission |
description |
The Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) is a major endoscopic scoring system used to assign a status of mucosal inflammation and disease activity to patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Using interobserver reliability (IOR), this study clarified the difficulties for endoscopic observers imposed by MES parameters used for the endoscopic evaluation of UC in histological remission. First, 42 endoscopists of four observer groups examined each MES parameter, which were evaluated from endoscopically obtained images of 100 cases as Grade 0 or 1 of the Nancy histological index of histopathological inflammation. Then, IOR was assessed using multiple κ statistics for each finding of MES. The results showed that IOR among all the observers was slight or fair for all the parameters, indicating a low IOR. The experts of the UC practice group had “moderate” or higher IOR for seven of the nine parameters, whereas “slight” or “fair” results were found for all parameters by the trainee group. The IOR for each MES parameter was calculated separately for the observer groups. All the groups showed “slight” or “fair” for “Erythema” and “Decreased vascular pattern”. Large differences between the endoscopists were found in the IOR for the MES parameters in UC in histological remission. Even among UC practice experts, the IOR was low for “Erythema” and “Decreased vascular pattern”. |
format |
article |
author |
Mimari Kanazawa Keiichi Tominaga Akira Yamamiya Takanao Tanaka Shoko Watanabe Takeshi Sugaya Keiichiro Abe Akira Kanamori Takahiro Arisaka Koki Hoshi Makoto Iijima Kenichi Goda Yasuo Haruyama Atsushi Irisawa |
author_facet |
Mimari Kanazawa Keiichi Tominaga Akira Yamamiya Takanao Tanaka Shoko Watanabe Takeshi Sugaya Keiichiro Abe Akira Kanamori Takahiro Arisaka Koki Hoshi Makoto Iijima Kenichi Goda Yasuo Haruyama Atsushi Irisawa |
author_sort |
Mimari Kanazawa |
title |
Analysis of Endoscopic Evaluation Reliability for Ulcerative Colitis in Histological Remission |
title_short |
Analysis of Endoscopic Evaluation Reliability for Ulcerative Colitis in Histological Remission |
title_full |
Analysis of Endoscopic Evaluation Reliability for Ulcerative Colitis in Histological Remission |
title_fullStr |
Analysis of Endoscopic Evaluation Reliability for Ulcerative Colitis in Histological Remission |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis of Endoscopic Evaluation Reliability for Ulcerative Colitis in Histological Remission |
title_sort |
analysis of endoscopic evaluation reliability for ulcerative colitis in histological remission |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/a71402d343f14ecabdd37a582e2e8d02 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mimarikanazawa analysisofendoscopicevaluationreliabilityforulcerativecolitisinhistologicalremission AT keiichitominaga analysisofendoscopicevaluationreliabilityforulcerativecolitisinhistologicalremission AT akirayamamiya analysisofendoscopicevaluationreliabilityforulcerativecolitisinhistologicalremission AT takanaotanaka analysisofendoscopicevaluationreliabilityforulcerativecolitisinhistologicalremission AT shokowatanabe analysisofendoscopicevaluationreliabilityforulcerativecolitisinhistologicalremission AT takeshisugaya analysisofendoscopicevaluationreliabilityforulcerativecolitisinhistologicalremission AT keiichiroabe analysisofendoscopicevaluationreliabilityforulcerativecolitisinhistologicalremission AT akirakanamori analysisofendoscopicevaluationreliabilityforulcerativecolitisinhistologicalremission AT takahiroarisaka analysisofendoscopicevaluationreliabilityforulcerativecolitisinhistologicalremission AT kokihoshi analysisofendoscopicevaluationreliabilityforulcerativecolitisinhistologicalremission AT makotoiijima analysisofendoscopicevaluationreliabilityforulcerativecolitisinhistologicalremission AT kenichigoda analysisofendoscopicevaluationreliabilityforulcerativecolitisinhistologicalremission AT yasuoharuyama analysisofendoscopicevaluationreliabilityforulcerativecolitisinhistologicalremission AT atsushiirisawa analysisofendoscopicevaluationreliabilityforulcerativecolitisinhistologicalremission |
_version_ |
1718412063099846656 |