Entanglement Phase Transitions in Measurement-Only Dynamics

Unitary circuits subject to repeated projective measurements can undergo an entanglement phase transition (EPT) as a function of the measurement rate. This transition is generally understood in terms of a competition between the scrambling effects of unitary dynamics and the disentangling effects of...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matteo Ippoliti, Michael J. Gullans, Sarang Gopalakrishnan, David A. Huse, Vedika Khemani
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: American Physical Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/a788681ae5d44405bb9def41fc8ab855
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:a788681ae5d44405bb9def41fc8ab855
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:a788681ae5d44405bb9def41fc8ab8552021-12-02T12:09:55ZEntanglement Phase Transitions in Measurement-Only Dynamics10.1103/PhysRevX.11.0110302160-3308https://doaj.org/article/a788681ae5d44405bb9def41fc8ab8552021-02-01T00:00:00Zhttp://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.11.011030http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.11.011030https://doaj.org/toc/2160-3308Unitary circuits subject to repeated projective measurements can undergo an entanglement phase transition (EPT) as a function of the measurement rate. This transition is generally understood in terms of a competition between the scrambling effects of unitary dynamics and the disentangling effects of measurements. We find that, surprisingly, EPTs are possible even in the absence of scrambling unitary dynamics, where they are best understood as arising from measurements alone. This finding motivates us to introduce measurement-only models, in which the “scrambling” and “unscrambling” effects driving the EPT are fundamentally intertwined and cannot be attributed to physically distinct processes. These models represent a novel form of an EPT, conceptually distinct from that in hybrid unitary-projective circuits. We explore the entanglement phase diagrams, critical points, and quantum code properties of some of these measurement-only models. We find that the principle driving the EPTs in these models is frustration, or mutual incompatibility, of the measurements. Surprisingly, an entangling (volume-law) phase is the generic outcome when measuring sufficiently long but still local (≳3-body) operators. We identify a class of exceptions to this behavior (“bipartite ensembles”) which cannot sustain an entangling phase but display dual area-law phases, possibly with different kinds of quantum order, separated by self-dual critical points. Finally, we introduce a measure of information spreading in dynamics with measurements and use it to demonstrate the emergence of a statistical light cone, despite the nonlocality inherent to quantum measurements.Matteo IppolitiMichael J. GullansSarang GopalakrishnanDavid A. HuseVedika KhemaniAmerican Physical SocietyarticlePhysicsQC1-999ENPhysical Review X, Vol 11, Iss 1, p 011030 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Physics
QC1-999
spellingShingle Physics
QC1-999
Matteo Ippoliti
Michael J. Gullans
Sarang Gopalakrishnan
David A. Huse
Vedika Khemani
Entanglement Phase Transitions in Measurement-Only Dynamics
description Unitary circuits subject to repeated projective measurements can undergo an entanglement phase transition (EPT) as a function of the measurement rate. This transition is generally understood in terms of a competition between the scrambling effects of unitary dynamics and the disentangling effects of measurements. We find that, surprisingly, EPTs are possible even in the absence of scrambling unitary dynamics, where they are best understood as arising from measurements alone. This finding motivates us to introduce measurement-only models, in which the “scrambling” and “unscrambling” effects driving the EPT are fundamentally intertwined and cannot be attributed to physically distinct processes. These models represent a novel form of an EPT, conceptually distinct from that in hybrid unitary-projective circuits. We explore the entanglement phase diagrams, critical points, and quantum code properties of some of these measurement-only models. We find that the principle driving the EPTs in these models is frustration, or mutual incompatibility, of the measurements. Surprisingly, an entangling (volume-law) phase is the generic outcome when measuring sufficiently long but still local (≳3-body) operators. We identify a class of exceptions to this behavior (“bipartite ensembles”) which cannot sustain an entangling phase but display dual area-law phases, possibly with different kinds of quantum order, separated by self-dual critical points. Finally, we introduce a measure of information spreading in dynamics with measurements and use it to demonstrate the emergence of a statistical light cone, despite the nonlocality inherent to quantum measurements.
format article
author Matteo Ippoliti
Michael J. Gullans
Sarang Gopalakrishnan
David A. Huse
Vedika Khemani
author_facet Matteo Ippoliti
Michael J. Gullans
Sarang Gopalakrishnan
David A. Huse
Vedika Khemani
author_sort Matteo Ippoliti
title Entanglement Phase Transitions in Measurement-Only Dynamics
title_short Entanglement Phase Transitions in Measurement-Only Dynamics
title_full Entanglement Phase Transitions in Measurement-Only Dynamics
title_fullStr Entanglement Phase Transitions in Measurement-Only Dynamics
title_full_unstemmed Entanglement Phase Transitions in Measurement-Only Dynamics
title_sort entanglement phase transitions in measurement-only dynamics
publisher American Physical Society
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/a788681ae5d44405bb9def41fc8ab855
work_keys_str_mv AT matteoippoliti entanglementphasetransitionsinmeasurementonlydynamics
AT michaeljgullans entanglementphasetransitionsinmeasurementonlydynamics
AT saranggopalakrishnan entanglementphasetransitionsinmeasurementonlydynamics
AT davidahuse entanglementphasetransitionsinmeasurementonlydynamics
AT vedikakhemani entanglementphasetransitionsinmeasurementonlydynamics
_version_ 1718394648333910016