Is revision of the council of Europe guidelines on electronic evidence already needed?

On 30 January 2019 the Council of Europe adopted the first guidelines on electronic evidence in civil and administrative proceedings (hereinafter also ‘Guidelines’).1 The authors question if the Guidelines already require some revisions. They also consider, whether the revised Guidelines should prov...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Remigijus Jokubauskas, Marek Świerczyński
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Utrecht University School of Law 2020
Materias:	electronic evidence guidelines online dispute resolutions systems digital divide artificial intelligence cloud computing blockchain Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence K1-7720
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/a7a9002381484590bb0007af79bccf65
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:a7a9002381484590bb0007af79bccf65
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:a7a9002381484590bb0007af79bccf652021-11-08T08:17:04ZIs revision of the council of Europe guidelines on electronic evidence already needed?1871-515X10.36633/ulr.525https://doaj.org/article/a7a9002381484590bb0007af79bccf652020-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/525https://doaj.org/toc/1871-515XOn 30 January 2019 the Council of Europe adopted the first guidelines on electronic evidence in civil and administrative proceedings (hereinafter also ‘Guidelines’).1 The authors question if the Guidelines already require some revisions. They also consider, whether the revised Guidelines should provide more practical advice to courts and legal practitioners related to electronic evidence. Several aspects have been identified regarding the use of the Guidelines by the courts in particular with the regard to the rapid development of online dispute resolutions systems and use of artificial intelligence algorithms in judicial systems. Both authors took an active part in the preparatory works of the Guidelines and believe it is in the interest of justice that the Guidelines should be regularly updated addressing and reflecting technological developments, new business models and evolving case-law.Remigijus JokubauskasMarek ŚwierczyńskiUtrecht University School of Lawarticleelectronic evidenceguidelinesonline dispute resolutions systemsdigital divideartificial intelligencecloud computingblockchainLaw in general. Comparative and uniform law. JurisprudenceK1-7720ENUtrecht Law Review, Vol 16, Iss 1 (2020)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	electronic evidence guidelines online dispute resolutions systems digital divide artificial intelligence cloud computing blockchain Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence K1-7720
spellingShingle	electronic evidence guidelines online dispute resolutions systems digital divide artificial intelligence cloud computing blockchain Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence K1-7720 Remigijus Jokubauskas Marek Świerczyński Is revision of the council of Europe guidelines on electronic evidence already needed?
description	On 30 January 2019 the Council of Europe adopted the first guidelines on electronic evidence in civil and administrative proceedings (hereinafter also ‘Guidelines’).1 The authors question if the Guidelines already require some revisions. They also consider, whether the revised Guidelines should provide more practical advice to courts and legal practitioners related to electronic evidence. Several aspects have been identified regarding the use of the Guidelines by the courts in particular with the regard to the rapid development of online dispute resolutions systems and use of artificial intelligence algorithms in judicial systems. Both authors took an active part in the preparatory works of the Guidelines and believe it is in the interest of justice that the Guidelines should be regularly updated addressing and reflecting technological developments, new business models and evolving case-law.
format	article
author	Remigijus Jokubauskas Marek Świerczyński
author_facet	Remigijus Jokubauskas Marek Świerczyński
author_sort	Remigijus Jokubauskas
title	Is revision of the council of Europe guidelines on electronic evidence already needed?
title_short	Is revision of the council of Europe guidelines on electronic evidence already needed?
title_full	Is revision of the council of Europe guidelines on electronic evidence already needed?
title_fullStr	Is revision of the council of Europe guidelines on electronic evidence already needed?
title_full_unstemmed	Is revision of the council of Europe guidelines on electronic evidence already needed?
title_sort	is revision of the council of europe guidelines on electronic evidence already needed?
publisher	Utrecht University School of Law
publishDate	2020
url	https://doaj.org/article/a7a9002381484590bb0007af79bccf65
work_keys_str_mv	AT remigijusjokubauskas isrevisionofthecouncilofeuropeguidelinesonelectronicevidencealreadyneeded AT marekswierczynski isrevisionofthecouncilofeuropeguidelinesonelectronicevidencealreadyneeded
_version_	1718442841075613696

Is revision of the council of Europe guidelines on electronic evidence already needed?

Ejemplares similares