Expressing Rules
The notion of conceptual normativity is grounded on the idea that our conceptual contents are established by the norms of the discursive social practices we engage in. This idea involves two major problems. First, where do the norms of discursive practices come from and how can the contents that th...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN FR IT |
Publicado: |
Rosenberg & Sellier
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/a7c8be7b3855467baf8ba82ffe9ed1c7 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:a7c8be7b3855467baf8ba82ffe9ed1c7 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:a7c8be7b3855467baf8ba82ffe9ed1c72021-12-02T08:26:05ZExpressing Rules10.13128/Phe_Mi-224392280-78532239-4028https://doaj.org/article/a7c8be7b3855467baf8ba82ffe9ed1c72017-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://oaj.fupress.net/index.php/pam/article/view/7299https://doaj.org/toc/2280-7853https://doaj.org/toc/2239-4028 The notion of conceptual normativity is grounded on the idea that our conceptual contents are established by the norms of the discursive social practices we engage in. This idea involves two major problems. First, where do the norms of discursive practices come from and how can the contents that they establish be objective? Second, what is the role of the vocabulary that we use to express such norms as explicit rules? This article draws the outline of an account that could possibly answer both questions. First, it explores the viability of a naturalism about conceptual normativity. Second, it defines the characters of a rational expressivist analysis of the language of the rules. Giacomo TurbantiRosenberg & Sellierarticlerule-followingnormative inferentialismpragmatic metavocabularynaturalismAestheticsBH1-301EthicsBJ1-1725ENFRITPhenomenology and Mind, Iss 13 (2017) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN FR IT |
topic |
rule-following normative inferentialism pragmatic metavocabulary naturalism Aesthetics BH1-301 Ethics BJ1-1725 |
spellingShingle |
rule-following normative inferentialism pragmatic metavocabulary naturalism Aesthetics BH1-301 Ethics BJ1-1725 Giacomo Turbanti Expressing Rules |
description |
The notion of conceptual normativity is grounded on the idea that our conceptual contents are established by the norms of the discursive social practices we engage in. This idea involves two major problems. First, where do the norms of discursive practices come from and how can the contents that they establish be objective? Second, what is the role of the vocabulary that we use to express such norms as explicit rules? This article draws the outline of an account that could possibly answer both questions. First, it explores the viability of a naturalism about conceptual normativity. Second, it defines the characters of a rational expressivist analysis of the language of the rules.
|
format |
article |
author |
Giacomo Turbanti |
author_facet |
Giacomo Turbanti |
author_sort |
Giacomo Turbanti |
title |
Expressing Rules |
title_short |
Expressing Rules |
title_full |
Expressing Rules |
title_fullStr |
Expressing Rules |
title_full_unstemmed |
Expressing Rules |
title_sort |
expressing rules |
publisher |
Rosenberg & Sellier |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/a7c8be7b3855467baf8ba82ffe9ed1c7 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT giacomoturbanti expressingrules |
_version_ |
1718398502476709888 |