DIFFERENCE OF BOWEL SOUND RETURN TIME AMONG POST-LAPARATOMY SURGERY PATIENTS AFTER CHEWING GUM

Background: A surgical procedure using general anaesthesia in laparotomy surgery results in reduced bowel sound. A large number of patients who experience a delay in returning bowel sound after laparotomy surgery become the reason to give proper intervention in order to increase bowel sound return t...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Warisya Miftah Amanda, Chandra Isabella H.P, Ristina Mirwanti
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Belitung Raya Foundation 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doi.org/10.33546/bnj.826
https://doaj.org/article/a7cd0735c3014c84b7e461740bdeccb2
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:a7cd0735c3014c84b7e461740bdeccb2
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:a7cd0735c3014c84b7e461740bdeccb22021-12-02T11:05:23ZDIFFERENCE OF BOWEL SOUND RETURN TIME AMONG POST-LAPARATOMY SURGERY PATIENTS AFTER CHEWING GUMhttps://doi.org/10.33546/bnj.8262477-40732477-4073https://doaj.org/article/a7cd0735c3014c84b7e461740bdeccb22019-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://belitungraya.org/BRP/index.php/bnj/article/view/826https://doaj.org/toc/2477-4073https://doaj.org/toc/2477-4073Background: A surgical procedure using general anaesthesia in laparotomy surgery results in reduced bowel sound. A large number of patients who experience a delay in returning bowel sound after laparotomy surgery become the reason to give proper intervention in order to increase bowel sound return time. One of the non-pharmacological interventions that can be used is chewing gum. Objective: The purpose of this study is to identify the difference of bowel sound return time between groups of intervention and control after being given chewing gum intervention among post-laparotomy surgery patients. Methods: This quasi-experimental study used post-test only control group design. Thirty respondents were selected by purposive sampling technique. Data were collected through observation by calculating the bowel sound return time among post laparotomy surgery patients in the intervention group (n=15) and control group (n=15), and were analyzed using the Mann Whitney test. The intervention group was asked to chew the gum once for 30 minutes, and bowel sound was measured every 30 minutes for 120 minutes. Results: The results showed that bowel sound return time in the intervention group was 90 minutes and the control group was 150 minutes, and p-value was 0.005. Conclusion: There was a difference in the return time of bowel sound between the intervention and control groups. Therefore, the intervention of chewing gum could become one of the non- pharmacological interventions that can be considered in increasing the bowel sound return time among post-laparotomy surgery patients.Warisya Miftah AmandaChandra Isabella H.PRistina MirwantiBelitung Raya Foundationarticlebowel soundchewing gumlaparotomypost surgeryNursingRT1-120ENBelitung Nursing Journal, Vol 5, Iss 5, Pp 204-211 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic bowel sound
chewing gum
laparotomy
post surgery
Nursing
RT1-120
spellingShingle bowel sound
chewing gum
laparotomy
post surgery
Nursing
RT1-120
Warisya Miftah Amanda
Chandra Isabella H.P
Ristina Mirwanti
DIFFERENCE OF BOWEL SOUND RETURN TIME AMONG POST-LAPARATOMY SURGERY PATIENTS AFTER CHEWING GUM
description Background: A surgical procedure using general anaesthesia in laparotomy surgery results in reduced bowel sound. A large number of patients who experience a delay in returning bowel sound after laparotomy surgery become the reason to give proper intervention in order to increase bowel sound return time. One of the non-pharmacological interventions that can be used is chewing gum. Objective: The purpose of this study is to identify the difference of bowel sound return time between groups of intervention and control after being given chewing gum intervention among post-laparotomy surgery patients. Methods: This quasi-experimental study used post-test only control group design. Thirty respondents were selected by purposive sampling technique. Data were collected through observation by calculating the bowel sound return time among post laparotomy surgery patients in the intervention group (n=15) and control group (n=15), and were analyzed using the Mann Whitney test. The intervention group was asked to chew the gum once for 30 minutes, and bowel sound was measured every 30 minutes for 120 minutes. Results: The results showed that bowel sound return time in the intervention group was 90 minutes and the control group was 150 minutes, and p-value was 0.005. Conclusion: There was a difference in the return time of bowel sound between the intervention and control groups. Therefore, the intervention of chewing gum could become one of the non- pharmacological interventions that can be considered in increasing the bowel sound return time among post-laparotomy surgery patients.
format article
author Warisya Miftah Amanda
Chandra Isabella H.P
Ristina Mirwanti
author_facet Warisya Miftah Amanda
Chandra Isabella H.P
Ristina Mirwanti
author_sort Warisya Miftah Amanda
title DIFFERENCE OF BOWEL SOUND RETURN TIME AMONG POST-LAPARATOMY SURGERY PATIENTS AFTER CHEWING GUM
title_short DIFFERENCE OF BOWEL SOUND RETURN TIME AMONG POST-LAPARATOMY SURGERY PATIENTS AFTER CHEWING GUM
title_full DIFFERENCE OF BOWEL SOUND RETURN TIME AMONG POST-LAPARATOMY SURGERY PATIENTS AFTER CHEWING GUM
title_fullStr DIFFERENCE OF BOWEL SOUND RETURN TIME AMONG POST-LAPARATOMY SURGERY PATIENTS AFTER CHEWING GUM
title_full_unstemmed DIFFERENCE OF BOWEL SOUND RETURN TIME AMONG POST-LAPARATOMY SURGERY PATIENTS AFTER CHEWING GUM
title_sort difference of bowel sound return time among post-laparatomy surgery patients after chewing gum
publisher Belitung Raya Foundation
publishDate 2019
url https://doi.org/10.33546/bnj.826
https://doaj.org/article/a7cd0735c3014c84b7e461740bdeccb2
work_keys_str_mv AT warisyamiftahamanda differenceofbowelsoundreturntimeamongpostlaparatomysurgerypatientsafterchewinggum
AT chandraisabellahp differenceofbowelsoundreturntimeamongpostlaparatomysurgerypatientsafterchewinggum
AT ristinamirwanti differenceofbowelsoundreturntimeamongpostlaparatomysurgerypatientsafterchewinggum
_version_ 1718396306717671424