Hydropower and environmental sustainability: A holistic assessment using multiple biophysical indicators

Along with other low-carbon combustion-free energy sources, hydropower is considered a valuable tool for mitigating the current climate and ecological crisis and achieve environmental sustainability. However, it is still unclear to what extent hydropower is or not environmentally sustainable. The li...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andrei Briones-Hidrovo, Javier Uche, Amaya Martínez-Gracia
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/a7d683b7b5d94a76b4949e54f17e1f6b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:a7d683b7b5d94a76b4949e54f17e1f6b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:a7d683b7b5d94a76b4949e54f17e1f6b2021-12-01T04:52:39ZHydropower and environmental sustainability: A holistic assessment using multiple biophysical indicators1470-160X10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107748https://doaj.org/article/a7d683b7b5d94a76b4949e54f17e1f6b2021-08-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X21004131https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160XAlong with other low-carbon combustion-free energy sources, hydropower is considered a valuable tool for mitigating the current climate and ecological crisis and achieve environmental sustainability. However, it is still unclear to what extent hydropower is or not environmentally sustainable. The literature reveals i) that no truly holistic assessments have been carried out and ii) that there are contradictory results and conclusions. The present study addresses this gap by conducting a holistic assessment, using eight biophysical indicators of different approaches, and taking two different hydropower plant schemes as study cases. The results of the assessment show that the run-of-river hydropower plant study case is by far more environmentally sustainable than the dam hydropower plant scheme. As hydropower schemes and sizes vary, it is highlighted the importance of including as many indicators as possible to ensure broader and complete assessments and the avoidance of bias in the conclusions and ease comparison with other low-carbon combustion-free energy sources and their technologies. Moreover, the present study addresses how and within which parameters the environmental sustainability of hydropower is usually determined. The complementary set of indicators provided here, which have different scope and complexity, could be adopted for improving future decision-making in energy policies and specifically for hydropower.Andrei Briones-HidrovoJavier UcheAmaya Martínez-GraciaElsevierarticleHydropowerLow-carbon combustion-free energyIndicatorsEnvironmental sustainabilityBiophysical assessmentEcologyQH540-549.5ENEcological Indicators, Vol 127, Iss , Pp 107748- (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Hydropower
Low-carbon combustion-free energy
Indicators
Environmental sustainability
Biophysical assessment
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle Hydropower
Low-carbon combustion-free energy
Indicators
Environmental sustainability
Biophysical assessment
Ecology
QH540-549.5
Andrei Briones-Hidrovo
Javier Uche
Amaya Martínez-Gracia
Hydropower and environmental sustainability: A holistic assessment using multiple biophysical indicators
description Along with other low-carbon combustion-free energy sources, hydropower is considered a valuable tool for mitigating the current climate and ecological crisis and achieve environmental sustainability. However, it is still unclear to what extent hydropower is or not environmentally sustainable. The literature reveals i) that no truly holistic assessments have been carried out and ii) that there are contradictory results and conclusions. The present study addresses this gap by conducting a holistic assessment, using eight biophysical indicators of different approaches, and taking two different hydropower plant schemes as study cases. The results of the assessment show that the run-of-river hydropower plant study case is by far more environmentally sustainable than the dam hydropower plant scheme. As hydropower schemes and sizes vary, it is highlighted the importance of including as many indicators as possible to ensure broader and complete assessments and the avoidance of bias in the conclusions and ease comparison with other low-carbon combustion-free energy sources and their technologies. Moreover, the present study addresses how and within which parameters the environmental sustainability of hydropower is usually determined. The complementary set of indicators provided here, which have different scope and complexity, could be adopted for improving future decision-making in energy policies and specifically for hydropower.
format article
author Andrei Briones-Hidrovo
Javier Uche
Amaya Martínez-Gracia
author_facet Andrei Briones-Hidrovo
Javier Uche
Amaya Martínez-Gracia
author_sort Andrei Briones-Hidrovo
title Hydropower and environmental sustainability: A holistic assessment using multiple biophysical indicators
title_short Hydropower and environmental sustainability: A holistic assessment using multiple biophysical indicators
title_full Hydropower and environmental sustainability: A holistic assessment using multiple biophysical indicators
title_fullStr Hydropower and environmental sustainability: A holistic assessment using multiple biophysical indicators
title_full_unstemmed Hydropower and environmental sustainability: A holistic assessment using multiple biophysical indicators
title_sort hydropower and environmental sustainability: a holistic assessment using multiple biophysical indicators
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/a7d683b7b5d94a76b4949e54f17e1f6b
work_keys_str_mv AT andreibrioneshidrovo hydropowerandenvironmentalsustainabilityaholisticassessmentusingmultiplebiophysicalindicators
AT javieruche hydropowerandenvironmentalsustainabilityaholisticassessmentusingmultiplebiophysicalindicators
AT amayamartinezgracia hydropowerandenvironmentalsustainabilityaholisticassessmentusingmultiplebiophysicalindicators
_version_ 1718405741805568000