Multilevel comparison of large urban systems

For the first time the systems of cities in seven countries or regions among the largest in the world (China, India, Brazil, Europe, the Former Soviet Union (FSU), the United States and South Africa) are made comparable through the building of spatio-temporal standardised statistical databases. We f...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Denise Pumain, Elfie Swerts, Clémentine Cottineau, Céline Vacchiani-Marcuzzo, Cosmo Antonio Ignazzi, Anne Bretagnolle, François Delisle, Robin Cura, Liliane Lizzi, Solène Baffi
Formato: article
Lenguaje:DE
EN
FR
IT
PT
Publicado: Unité Mixte de Recherche 8504 Géographie-cités 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/a81aeb0d101d43e1a764b28d7066321e
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:a81aeb0d101d43e1a764b28d7066321e
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:a81aeb0d101d43e1a764b28d7066321e2021-12-02T11:14:27ZMultilevel comparison of large urban systems1278-336610.4000/cybergeo.26730https://doaj.org/article/a81aeb0d101d43e1a764b28d7066321e2015-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://journals.openedition.org/cybergeo/26730https://doaj.org/toc/1278-3366For the first time the systems of cities in seven countries or regions among the largest in the world (China, India, Brazil, Europe, the Former Soviet Union (FSU), the United States and South Africa) are made comparable through the building of spatio-temporal standardised statistical databases. We first explain the concept of a generic evolutionary urban unit (“city”) and its necessary adaptations to the information provided by each national statistical system. Second, the hierarchical structure and the urban growth process are compared at macro-scale for the seven countries with reference to Zipf’s and Gibrat’s model: in agreement with an evolutionary theory of urban systems, large similarities shape the hierarchical structure and growth processes in BRICS countries as well as in Europe and United States, despite their positions at different stages in the urban transition that explain some structural peculiarities. Third, the individual trajectories of some 10,000 cities are mapped at micro-scale following a cluster analysis of their evolution over the last fifty years. A few common principles extracted from the evolutionary theory of urban systems can explain the diversity of these trajectories, including a specific pattern in their geographical repartition in the Chinese case. We conclude that the observations at macro-level when summarized as stylised facts can help in designing simulation models of urban systems whereas the urban trajectories identified at micro-level are consistent enough for constituting the basis of plausible future population projections.Denise PumainElfie SwertsClémentine CottineauCéline Vacchiani-MarcuzzoCosmo Antonio IgnazziAnne BretagnolleFrançois DelisleRobin CuraLiliane LizziSolène BaffiUnité Mixte de Recherche 8504 Géographie-citésarticleurban systemZipf’s lawGibratcities trajectoriesBRICSGeography (General)G1-922DEENFRITPTCybergeo (2015)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language DE
EN
FR
IT
PT
topic urban system
Zipf’s law
Gibrat
cities trajectories
BRICS
Geography (General)
G1-922
spellingShingle urban system
Zipf’s law
Gibrat
cities trajectories
BRICS
Geography (General)
G1-922
Denise Pumain
Elfie Swerts
Clémentine Cottineau
Céline Vacchiani-Marcuzzo
Cosmo Antonio Ignazzi
Anne Bretagnolle
François Delisle
Robin Cura
Liliane Lizzi
Solène Baffi
Multilevel comparison of large urban systems
description For the first time the systems of cities in seven countries or regions among the largest in the world (China, India, Brazil, Europe, the Former Soviet Union (FSU), the United States and South Africa) are made comparable through the building of spatio-temporal standardised statistical databases. We first explain the concept of a generic evolutionary urban unit (“city”) and its necessary adaptations to the information provided by each national statistical system. Second, the hierarchical structure and the urban growth process are compared at macro-scale for the seven countries with reference to Zipf’s and Gibrat’s model: in agreement with an evolutionary theory of urban systems, large similarities shape the hierarchical structure and growth processes in BRICS countries as well as in Europe and United States, despite their positions at different stages in the urban transition that explain some structural peculiarities. Third, the individual trajectories of some 10,000 cities are mapped at micro-scale following a cluster analysis of their evolution over the last fifty years. A few common principles extracted from the evolutionary theory of urban systems can explain the diversity of these trajectories, including a specific pattern in their geographical repartition in the Chinese case. We conclude that the observations at macro-level when summarized as stylised facts can help in designing simulation models of urban systems whereas the urban trajectories identified at micro-level are consistent enough for constituting the basis of plausible future population projections.
format article
author Denise Pumain
Elfie Swerts
Clémentine Cottineau
Céline Vacchiani-Marcuzzo
Cosmo Antonio Ignazzi
Anne Bretagnolle
François Delisle
Robin Cura
Liliane Lizzi
Solène Baffi
author_facet Denise Pumain
Elfie Swerts
Clémentine Cottineau
Céline Vacchiani-Marcuzzo
Cosmo Antonio Ignazzi
Anne Bretagnolle
François Delisle
Robin Cura
Liliane Lizzi
Solène Baffi
author_sort Denise Pumain
title Multilevel comparison of large urban systems
title_short Multilevel comparison of large urban systems
title_full Multilevel comparison of large urban systems
title_fullStr Multilevel comparison of large urban systems
title_full_unstemmed Multilevel comparison of large urban systems
title_sort multilevel comparison of large urban systems
publisher Unité Mixte de Recherche 8504 Géographie-cités
publishDate 2015
url https://doaj.org/article/a81aeb0d101d43e1a764b28d7066321e
work_keys_str_mv AT denisepumain multilevelcomparisonoflargeurbansystems
AT elfieswerts multilevelcomparisonoflargeurbansystems
AT clementinecottineau multilevelcomparisonoflargeurbansystems
AT celinevacchianimarcuzzo multilevelcomparisonoflargeurbansystems
AT cosmoantonioignazzi multilevelcomparisonoflargeurbansystems
AT annebretagnolle multilevelcomparisonoflargeurbansystems
AT francoisdelisle multilevelcomparisonoflargeurbansystems
AT robincura multilevelcomparisonoflargeurbansystems
AT lilianelizzi multilevelcomparisonoflargeurbansystems
AT solenebaffi multilevelcomparisonoflargeurbansystems
_version_ 1718396126383570944