Cortical silent period reflects individual differences in action stopping performance

Abstract Inhibitory control is the ability to suppress inappropriate movements and unwanted actions, allowing to regulate impulses and responses. This ability can be measured via the Stop Signal Task, which provides a temporal index of response inhibition, namely the stop signal reaction time (SSRT...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mario Paci, Giulio Di Cosmo, Mauro Gianni Perrucci, Francesca Ferri, Marcello Costantini
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/a88fdc52510d4ee798bc1cfd2000c779
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:a88fdc52510d4ee798bc1cfd2000c779
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:a88fdc52510d4ee798bc1cfd2000c7792021-12-02T18:47:03ZCortical silent period reflects individual differences in action stopping performance10.1038/s41598-021-94494-w2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/a88fdc52510d4ee798bc1cfd2000c7792021-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94494-whttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Inhibitory control is the ability to suppress inappropriate movements and unwanted actions, allowing to regulate impulses and responses. This ability can be measured via the Stop Signal Task, which provides a temporal index of response inhibition, namely the stop signal reaction time (SSRT). At the neural level, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) allows to investigate motor inhibition within the primary motor cortex (M1), such as the cortical silent period (CSP) which is an index of GABAB-mediated intracortical inhibition within M1. Although there is strong evidence that intracortical inhibition varies during action stopping, it is still not clear whether differences in the neurophysiological markers of intracortical inhibition contribute to behavioral differences in actual inhibitory capacities. Hence, here we explored the relationship between intracortical inhibition within M1 and behavioral response inhibition. GABABergic-mediated inhibition in M1 was determined by the duration of CSP, while behavioral inhibition was assessed by the SSRT. We found a significant positive correlation between CSP’s duration and SSRT, namely that individuals with greater levels of GABABergic-mediated inhibition seem to perform overall worse in inhibiting behavioral responses. These results support the assumption that individual differences in intracortical inhibition are mirrored by individual differences in action stopping abilities.Mario PaciGiulio Di CosmoMauro Gianni PerrucciFrancesca FerriMarcello CostantiniNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Mario Paci
Giulio Di Cosmo
Mauro Gianni Perrucci
Francesca Ferri
Marcello Costantini
Cortical silent period reflects individual differences in action stopping performance
description Abstract Inhibitory control is the ability to suppress inappropriate movements and unwanted actions, allowing to regulate impulses and responses. This ability can be measured via the Stop Signal Task, which provides a temporal index of response inhibition, namely the stop signal reaction time (SSRT). At the neural level, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) allows to investigate motor inhibition within the primary motor cortex (M1), such as the cortical silent period (CSP) which is an index of GABAB-mediated intracortical inhibition within M1. Although there is strong evidence that intracortical inhibition varies during action stopping, it is still not clear whether differences in the neurophysiological markers of intracortical inhibition contribute to behavioral differences in actual inhibitory capacities. Hence, here we explored the relationship between intracortical inhibition within M1 and behavioral response inhibition. GABABergic-mediated inhibition in M1 was determined by the duration of CSP, while behavioral inhibition was assessed by the SSRT. We found a significant positive correlation between CSP’s duration and SSRT, namely that individuals with greater levels of GABABergic-mediated inhibition seem to perform overall worse in inhibiting behavioral responses. These results support the assumption that individual differences in intracortical inhibition are mirrored by individual differences in action stopping abilities.
format article
author Mario Paci
Giulio Di Cosmo
Mauro Gianni Perrucci
Francesca Ferri
Marcello Costantini
author_facet Mario Paci
Giulio Di Cosmo
Mauro Gianni Perrucci
Francesca Ferri
Marcello Costantini
author_sort Mario Paci
title Cortical silent period reflects individual differences in action stopping performance
title_short Cortical silent period reflects individual differences in action stopping performance
title_full Cortical silent period reflects individual differences in action stopping performance
title_fullStr Cortical silent period reflects individual differences in action stopping performance
title_full_unstemmed Cortical silent period reflects individual differences in action stopping performance
title_sort cortical silent period reflects individual differences in action stopping performance
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/a88fdc52510d4ee798bc1cfd2000c779
work_keys_str_mv AT mariopaci corticalsilentperiodreflectsindividualdifferencesinactionstoppingperformance
AT giuliodicosmo corticalsilentperiodreflectsindividualdifferencesinactionstoppingperformance
AT maurogianniperrucci corticalsilentperiodreflectsindividualdifferencesinactionstoppingperformance
AT francescaferri corticalsilentperiodreflectsindividualdifferencesinactionstoppingperformance
AT marcellocostantini corticalsilentperiodreflectsindividualdifferencesinactionstoppingperformance
_version_ 1718377697463238656