Small Prose of Y. Mamleev: Tradition or Anti-tradition

The features of the interpretation of philosophical questions, traditional motifs and plots in the short prose of Yu. Mamleev are considered. The relevance of the study is due to the emergence of a large number of studies devoted to Y. Mamleev, but insufficient analysis of the nature of traditional...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	L. G. Khoreva
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	RU
Publicado:	Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov 2018
Materias:	small prose mamleev dostoevsky gogol tradition anti-tradition Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/a8bd4512b17f44ffac9e9e1ae9cfb737
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:a8bd4512b17f44ffac9e9e1ae9cfb737
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:a8bd4512b17f44ffac9e9e1ae9cfb7372021-12-02T07:58:06ZSmall Prose of Y. Mamleev: Tradition or Anti-tradition2225-756X2227-129510.24224/2227-1295-2018-12-246-256https://doaj.org/article/a8bd4512b17f44ffac9e9e1ae9cfb7372018-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/1028https://doaj.org/toc/2225-756Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2227-1295The features of the interpretation of philosophical questions, traditional motifs and plots in the short prose of Yu. Mamleev are considered. The relevance of the study is due to the emergence of a large number of studies devoted to Y. Mamleev, but insufficient analysis of the nature of traditional and / or anti-traditional aspects in the writer's prose. An overview of the concepts of “cultural tradition” and “cultural anti-tradition” in the works of domestic and foreign researchers is offered. The author considers the concepts of “counter-tradition” and “anti-tradition”, gives the definition of cultural studies, comes to the conclusion about a single genesis of tradition and anti-tradition, unlike tradition and counter-tradition. Reference to this material is the novelty of the study. The author comes to the conclusion that the work of Mamleev, despite the new interpretation of the Russian idea he declared, continues the traditions of Gogol and Dostoevsky. It is shown that the questions risen by Mamleev, and their solutions, as well as the presented interpretations of philosophical systems should be considered in line with the principles of anti-tradition, creating its own world, different from the traditional one, which awakens new feelings and emotions in the reader, but raises and solves questions that were raised by Gogol and Dostoevsky.L. G. KhorevaTsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektovarticlesmall prosemamleevdostoevskygogoltraditionanti-traditionSlavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languagesPG1-9665RUНаучный диалог, Vol 0, Iss 12, Pp 246-256 (2018)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	RU
topic	small prose mamleev dostoevsky gogol tradition anti-tradition Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665
spellingShingle	small prose mamleev dostoevsky gogol tradition anti-tradition Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665 L. G. Khoreva Small Prose of Y. Mamleev: Tradition or Anti-tradition
description	The features of the interpretation of philosophical questions, traditional motifs and plots in the short prose of Yu. Mamleev are considered. The relevance of the study is due to the emergence of a large number of studies devoted to Y. Mamleev, but insufficient analysis of the nature of traditional and / or anti-traditional aspects in the writer's prose. An overview of the concepts of “cultural tradition” and “cultural anti-tradition” in the works of domestic and foreign researchers is offered. The author considers the concepts of “counter-tradition” and “anti-tradition”, gives the definition of cultural studies, comes to the conclusion about a single genesis of tradition and anti-tradition, unlike tradition and counter-tradition. Reference to this material is the novelty of the study. The author comes to the conclusion that the work of Mamleev, despite the new interpretation of the Russian idea he declared, continues the traditions of Gogol and Dostoevsky. It is shown that the questions risen by Mamleev, and their solutions, as well as the presented interpretations of philosophical systems should be considered in line with the principles of anti-tradition, creating its own world, different from the traditional one, which awakens new feelings and emotions in the reader, but raises and solves questions that were raised by Gogol and Dostoevsky.
format	article
author	L. G. Khoreva
author_facet	L. G. Khoreva
author_sort	L. G. Khoreva
title	Small Prose of Y. Mamleev: Tradition or Anti-tradition
title_short	Small Prose of Y. Mamleev: Tradition or Anti-tradition
title_full	Small Prose of Y. Mamleev: Tradition or Anti-tradition
title_fullStr	Small Prose of Y. Mamleev: Tradition or Anti-tradition
title_full_unstemmed	Small Prose of Y. Mamleev: Tradition or Anti-tradition
title_sort	small prose of y. mamleev: tradition or anti-tradition
publisher	Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov
publishDate	2018
url	https://doaj.org/article/a8bd4512b17f44ffac9e9e1ae9cfb737
work_keys_str_mv	AT lgkhoreva smallproseofymamleevtraditionorantitradition
_version_	1718398935683301376

Small Prose of Y. Mamleev: Tradition or Anti-tradition

Ejemplares similares