Feed intake, nutrient digestibility, and selected rumen parameters in feedlot bulls fed diets with different feed additives

An experiment was conducted to evaluate the feed intake, nutrient digestibility and selected rumen parameters in feedlot bulls fed diets containing different feed additives. Six rumen-cannulated Nellore bulls (age = 8 ± 1.0 months; initial BW = 225 ± 13.2 kg) were distributed in a 6 × 6 Latin square...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Breno de Castro Silva, Marcos Vinicius Carneiro Pacheco, Letícia Artuzo Godoi, Gilyard Angelo Pinheiro de Souza, Nathália Veloso Trópia, Pauliane Pucetti, Flávia Adriane de Sales Silva, Ana Clara Baião Menezes, Luciana Navajas Rennó, Mário Fonseca Paulino, Jon Patrick Schoonmaker, Sebastião de Campos Valadares Filho
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/a8e0e537de084cbb8e98ad7bf90746bd
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:a8e0e537de084cbb8e98ad7bf90746bd
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:a8e0e537de084cbb8e98ad7bf90746bd2021-11-11T06:44:19ZFeed intake, nutrient digestibility, and selected rumen parameters in feedlot bulls fed diets with different feed additives1932-6203https://doaj.org/article/a8e0e537de084cbb8e98ad7bf90746bd2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8562795/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203An experiment was conducted to evaluate the feed intake, nutrient digestibility and selected rumen parameters in feedlot bulls fed diets containing different feed additives. Six rumen-cannulated Nellore bulls (age = 8 ± 1.0 months; initial BW = 225 ± 13.2 kg) were distributed in a 6 × 6 Latin square design. Six experimental diets based on 30% corn silage and 70% concentrate on a dry matter (DM) basis were evaluated. Diets differed in feed additive on a DM basis, as follows: 1.4% bicarbonate and magnesium oxide in 3:1 ratio (BOX); 36 ppm lasalocid sodium (LAS); 30 ppm monensin sodium (MON); 25 ppm virginiamycin (VIR); 30 ppm monensin sodium plus 25 ppm virginiamycin (MV); and 3.15% commercial mineral supplement containing D-limonene and exogenous α-amylase (EOA). The experiment lasted 144 d, with six periods of 24 d. Each period consisted of 14 d for dietary adaptation, 3 d for feces and urine collection, and 7 d for omasal and ruminal digesta collection. Bulls fed the BOX diet showed greater (P < 0.05) intake of DM, organic matter (OM), neutral detergent fiber (apNDF), crude protein (CP), and starch compared to the other diets. Diets with LAS, MON, VIR, MV, or EOA did not influence (P > 0.05) the DM, OM, apNDF, CP, or starch intake of feedlot bulls. Bulls fed the EOA diet showed greater (trend; P = 0.09) ruminal digestibility of starch compared to the other diets. The feed additives did not affect (P > 0.05) the intestinal or total tract digestibility of starch, rumen pH, microbial efficiency, total rumen fluid, dilution rate, rate of intake, rate of degradation, or passage rate of the DM, OM, apNDF, and starch. In conclusion, LAS, MON, VIR, MV, and EOA diets reduced nutrient intake compared to BOX. Although all feed additives presented similar effects on rumen pH, temperature, and kinetics the presence of exogenous α-amylase in the EOA diet may increase ruminal starch digestibility and apparent total tract digestibility of DM and OM.Breno de Castro SilvaMarcos Vinicius Carneiro PachecoLetícia Artuzo GodoiGilyard Angelo Pinheiro de SouzaNathália Veloso TrópiaPauliane PucettiFlávia Adriane de Sales SilvaAna Clara Baião MenezesLuciana Navajas RennóMário Fonseca PaulinoJon Patrick SchoonmakerSebastião de Campos Valadares FilhoPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 11 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Breno de Castro Silva
Marcos Vinicius Carneiro Pacheco
Letícia Artuzo Godoi
Gilyard Angelo Pinheiro de Souza
Nathália Veloso Trópia
Pauliane Pucetti
Flávia Adriane de Sales Silva
Ana Clara Baião Menezes
Luciana Navajas Rennó
Mário Fonseca Paulino
Jon Patrick Schoonmaker
Sebastião de Campos Valadares Filho
Feed intake, nutrient digestibility, and selected rumen parameters in feedlot bulls fed diets with different feed additives
description An experiment was conducted to evaluate the feed intake, nutrient digestibility and selected rumen parameters in feedlot bulls fed diets containing different feed additives. Six rumen-cannulated Nellore bulls (age = 8 ± 1.0 months; initial BW = 225 ± 13.2 kg) were distributed in a 6 × 6 Latin square design. Six experimental diets based on 30% corn silage and 70% concentrate on a dry matter (DM) basis were evaluated. Diets differed in feed additive on a DM basis, as follows: 1.4% bicarbonate and magnesium oxide in 3:1 ratio (BOX); 36 ppm lasalocid sodium (LAS); 30 ppm monensin sodium (MON); 25 ppm virginiamycin (VIR); 30 ppm monensin sodium plus 25 ppm virginiamycin (MV); and 3.15% commercial mineral supplement containing D-limonene and exogenous α-amylase (EOA). The experiment lasted 144 d, with six periods of 24 d. Each period consisted of 14 d for dietary adaptation, 3 d for feces and urine collection, and 7 d for omasal and ruminal digesta collection. Bulls fed the BOX diet showed greater (P < 0.05) intake of DM, organic matter (OM), neutral detergent fiber (apNDF), crude protein (CP), and starch compared to the other diets. Diets with LAS, MON, VIR, MV, or EOA did not influence (P > 0.05) the DM, OM, apNDF, CP, or starch intake of feedlot bulls. Bulls fed the EOA diet showed greater (trend; P = 0.09) ruminal digestibility of starch compared to the other diets. The feed additives did not affect (P > 0.05) the intestinal or total tract digestibility of starch, rumen pH, microbial efficiency, total rumen fluid, dilution rate, rate of intake, rate of degradation, or passage rate of the DM, OM, apNDF, and starch. In conclusion, LAS, MON, VIR, MV, and EOA diets reduced nutrient intake compared to BOX. Although all feed additives presented similar effects on rumen pH, temperature, and kinetics the presence of exogenous α-amylase in the EOA diet may increase ruminal starch digestibility and apparent total tract digestibility of DM and OM.
format article
author Breno de Castro Silva
Marcos Vinicius Carneiro Pacheco
Letícia Artuzo Godoi
Gilyard Angelo Pinheiro de Souza
Nathália Veloso Trópia
Pauliane Pucetti
Flávia Adriane de Sales Silva
Ana Clara Baião Menezes
Luciana Navajas Rennó
Mário Fonseca Paulino
Jon Patrick Schoonmaker
Sebastião de Campos Valadares Filho
author_facet Breno de Castro Silva
Marcos Vinicius Carneiro Pacheco
Letícia Artuzo Godoi
Gilyard Angelo Pinheiro de Souza
Nathália Veloso Trópia
Pauliane Pucetti
Flávia Adriane de Sales Silva
Ana Clara Baião Menezes
Luciana Navajas Rennó
Mário Fonseca Paulino
Jon Patrick Schoonmaker
Sebastião de Campos Valadares Filho
author_sort Breno de Castro Silva
title Feed intake, nutrient digestibility, and selected rumen parameters in feedlot bulls fed diets with different feed additives
title_short Feed intake, nutrient digestibility, and selected rumen parameters in feedlot bulls fed diets with different feed additives
title_full Feed intake, nutrient digestibility, and selected rumen parameters in feedlot bulls fed diets with different feed additives
title_fullStr Feed intake, nutrient digestibility, and selected rumen parameters in feedlot bulls fed diets with different feed additives
title_full_unstemmed Feed intake, nutrient digestibility, and selected rumen parameters in feedlot bulls fed diets with different feed additives
title_sort feed intake, nutrient digestibility, and selected rumen parameters in feedlot bulls fed diets with different feed additives
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/a8e0e537de084cbb8e98ad7bf90746bd
work_keys_str_mv AT brenodecastrosilva feedintakenutrientdigestibilityandselectedrumenparametersinfeedlotbullsfeddietswithdifferentfeedadditives
AT marcosviniciuscarneiropacheco feedintakenutrientdigestibilityandselectedrumenparametersinfeedlotbullsfeddietswithdifferentfeedadditives
AT leticiaartuzogodoi feedintakenutrientdigestibilityandselectedrumenparametersinfeedlotbullsfeddietswithdifferentfeedadditives
AT gilyardangelopinheirodesouza feedintakenutrientdigestibilityandselectedrumenparametersinfeedlotbullsfeddietswithdifferentfeedadditives
AT nathaliavelosotropia feedintakenutrientdigestibilityandselectedrumenparametersinfeedlotbullsfeddietswithdifferentfeedadditives
AT paulianepucetti feedintakenutrientdigestibilityandselectedrumenparametersinfeedlotbullsfeddietswithdifferentfeedadditives
AT flaviaadrianedesalessilva feedintakenutrientdigestibilityandselectedrumenparametersinfeedlotbullsfeddietswithdifferentfeedadditives
AT anaclarabaiaomenezes feedintakenutrientdigestibilityandselectedrumenparametersinfeedlotbullsfeddietswithdifferentfeedadditives
AT luciananavajasrenno feedintakenutrientdigestibilityandselectedrumenparametersinfeedlotbullsfeddietswithdifferentfeedadditives
AT mariofonsecapaulino feedintakenutrientdigestibilityandselectedrumenparametersinfeedlotbullsfeddietswithdifferentfeedadditives
AT jonpatrickschoonmaker feedintakenutrientdigestibilityandselectedrumenparametersinfeedlotbullsfeddietswithdifferentfeedadditives
AT sebastiaodecamposvaladaresfilho feedintakenutrientdigestibilityandselectedrumenparametersinfeedlotbullsfeddietswithdifferentfeedadditives
_version_ 1718439523938992128