A Dilemma about the Mental

Physicalism demands an explication of what it means for something to be physical. But the most popular way of providing one—viz., characterizing the physical in terms of the postulates of a scientifically derived physical theory—is met with serious trouble. Proponents of physicalism can either appea...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guy Dove, Andreas Elpidorou
Formato: article
Lenguaje:CS
EN
SK
Publicado: Institute of Philosophy of the Slovak Academy of Sciences 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doi.org/10.31577/orgf.2021.28406
https://doaj.org/article/a9279fc3ec2e40a1b43069defafc977d
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:a9279fc3ec2e40a1b43069defafc977d
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:a9279fc3ec2e40a1b43069defafc977d2021-12-02T17:47:18ZA Dilemma about the Mentalhttps://doi.org/10.31577/orgf.2021.284061335-06682585-7150https://doaj.org/article/a9279fc3ec2e40a1b43069defafc977d2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.sav.sk/journals/uploads/11292211orgf.2021.28406.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/1335-0668https://doaj.org/toc/2585-7150Physicalism demands an explication of what it means for something to be physical. But the most popular way of providing one—viz., characterizing the physical in terms of the postulates of a scientifically derived physical theory—is met with serious trouble. Proponents of physicalism can either appeal to current physical theory or to some future physical theory (preferably an ideal and complete one). Neither option is promising: currentism almost assuredly renders physicalism false and futurism appears to render it indeterminate or trivial. The purpose of this essay is to argue that attempts to characterize the mental encounter a similar dilemma: currentism with respect to the mental is likely to be inadequate or contain falsehoods and futurism leaves too many significant questions about the nature of mentality unanswered. This new dilemma, we show, threatens both sides of the current debate surrounding the metaphysical status of the mind.Guy DoveAndreas ElpidorouInstitute of Philosophy of the Slovak Academy of SciencesarticleconsciousnessmaterialismmentalmetaphysicsmindphysicalphysicalismreductiontheoryPhilosophy (General)B1-5802CSENSKOrganon F, Vol 28, Iss 4, Pp 867-895 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language CS
EN
SK
topic consciousness
materialism
mental
metaphysics
mind
physical
physicalism
reduction
theory
Philosophy (General)
B1-5802
spellingShingle consciousness
materialism
mental
metaphysics
mind
physical
physicalism
reduction
theory
Philosophy (General)
B1-5802
Guy Dove
Andreas Elpidorou
A Dilemma about the Mental
description Physicalism demands an explication of what it means for something to be physical. But the most popular way of providing one—viz., characterizing the physical in terms of the postulates of a scientifically derived physical theory—is met with serious trouble. Proponents of physicalism can either appeal to current physical theory or to some future physical theory (preferably an ideal and complete one). Neither option is promising: currentism almost assuredly renders physicalism false and futurism appears to render it indeterminate or trivial. The purpose of this essay is to argue that attempts to characterize the mental encounter a similar dilemma: currentism with respect to the mental is likely to be inadequate or contain falsehoods and futurism leaves too many significant questions about the nature of mentality unanswered. This new dilemma, we show, threatens both sides of the current debate surrounding the metaphysical status of the mind.
format article
author Guy Dove
Andreas Elpidorou
author_facet Guy Dove
Andreas Elpidorou
author_sort Guy Dove
title A Dilemma about the Mental
title_short A Dilemma about the Mental
title_full A Dilemma about the Mental
title_fullStr A Dilemma about the Mental
title_full_unstemmed A Dilemma about the Mental
title_sort dilemma about the mental
publisher Institute of Philosophy of the Slovak Academy of Sciences
publishDate 2021
url https://doi.org/10.31577/orgf.2021.28406
https://doaj.org/article/a9279fc3ec2e40a1b43069defafc977d
work_keys_str_mv AT guydove adilemmaaboutthemental
AT andreaselpidorou adilemmaaboutthemental
AT guydove dilemmaaboutthemental
AT andreaselpidorou dilemmaaboutthemental
_version_ 1718379487406587904