Processual Validity in Qualitative Research in Healthcare

Knowledge development has been continuously challenging. Qualitative research seems to be promising; however, there are difficulties and complexities involved, one of which is validity. Qualitative research is based on different paradigms, ontologies, theories, and methods, and validity assessment m...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Paulo Hayashi, Gustavo Abib, Norberto Hoppen, Lillian Daisy Gonçalves Wolff
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	SAGE Publishing 2021
Materias:	Public aspects of medicine RA1-1270
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/a9334eca39e94b919604d90567e12d01
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:a9334eca39e94b919604d90567e12d01
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:a9334eca39e94b919604d90567e12d012021-12-01T22:34:30ZProcessual Validity in Qualitative Research in Healthcare0046-95801945-724310.1177/00469580211060750https://doaj.org/article/a9334eca39e94b919604d90567e12d012021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1177/00469580211060750https://doaj.org/toc/0046-9580https://doaj.org/toc/1945-7243Knowledge development has been continuously challenging. Qualitative research seems to be promising; however, there are difficulties and complexities involved, one of which is validity. Qualitative research is based on different paradigms, ontologies, theories, and methods, and validity assessment may vary. We argue that processual validity can positively influence qualitative health care research. Processual validity is a methodological construction that involves all research steps, including those before and after data collection and analysis. We selected a processual validity model and two cases to illustrate its use and demonstrate processual validity’s importance and applicability. One case explores the gap between medical education and patients’ needs in primary health care. Other studies focus on health care improvements in hospitals. Our results highlight the benefits of processual validity to ensure the transparency and reliability of the research process and provide evidence of the findings to positively influence thinking and the execution of qualitative research in health care.Paulo HayashiGustavo AbibNorberto HoppenLillian Daisy Gonçalves WolffSAGE PublishingarticlePublic aspects of medicineRA1-1270ENInquiry: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing, Vol 58 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Public aspects of medicine RA1-1270
spellingShingle	Public aspects of medicine RA1-1270 Paulo Hayashi Gustavo Abib Norberto Hoppen Lillian Daisy Gonçalves Wolff Processual Validity in Qualitative Research in Healthcare
description	Knowledge development has been continuously challenging. Qualitative research seems to be promising; however, there are difficulties and complexities involved, one of which is validity. Qualitative research is based on different paradigms, ontologies, theories, and methods, and validity assessment may vary. We argue that processual validity can positively influence qualitative health care research. Processual validity is a methodological construction that involves all research steps, including those before and after data collection and analysis. We selected a processual validity model and two cases to illustrate its use and demonstrate processual validity’s importance and applicability. One case explores the gap between medical education and patients’ needs in primary health care. Other studies focus on health care improvements in hospitals. Our results highlight the benefits of processual validity to ensure the transparency and reliability of the research process and provide evidence of the findings to positively influence thinking and the execution of qualitative research in health care.
format	article
author	Paulo Hayashi Gustavo Abib Norberto Hoppen Lillian Daisy Gonçalves Wolff
author_facet	Paulo Hayashi Gustavo Abib Norberto Hoppen Lillian Daisy Gonçalves Wolff
author_sort	Paulo Hayashi
title	Processual Validity in Qualitative Research in Healthcare
title_short	Processual Validity in Qualitative Research in Healthcare
title_full	Processual Validity in Qualitative Research in Healthcare
title_fullStr	Processual Validity in Qualitative Research in Healthcare
title_full_unstemmed	Processual Validity in Qualitative Research in Healthcare
title_sort	processual validity in qualitative research in healthcare
publisher	SAGE Publishing
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/a9334eca39e94b919604d90567e12d01
work_keys_str_mv	AT paulohayashi processualvalidityinqualitativeresearchinhealthcare AT gustavoabib processualvalidityinqualitativeresearchinhealthcare AT norbertohoppen processualvalidityinqualitativeresearchinhealthcare AT lilliandaisygoncalveswolff processualvalidityinqualitativeresearchinhealthcare
_version_	1718404120920981504

Processual Validity in Qualitative Research in Healthcare

Ejemplares similares