Clinically Relevant Interactions with Anti-Infectives on Intensive Care Units—A Multicenter Delphi Study
Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) are at high risk of drug–drug interactions (DDIs) due to polypharmacy. Little is known about type and frequency of DDIs within German ICUs. Clinical pharmacists’ interventions (PI) recorded in a national database (ADKA-DokuPIK) were filtered for ICU patients....
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/a954d48872ce4c0a83e722015168be25 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:a954d48872ce4c0a83e722015168be25 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:a954d48872ce4c0a83e722015168be252021-11-25T16:22:55ZClinically Relevant Interactions with Anti-Infectives on Intensive Care Units—A Multicenter Delphi Study10.3390/antibiotics101113302079-6382https://doaj.org/article/a954d48872ce4c0a83e722015168be252021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/10/11/1330https://doaj.org/toc/2079-6382Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) are at high risk of drug–drug interactions (DDIs) due to polypharmacy. Little is known about type and frequency of DDIs within German ICUs. Clinical pharmacists’ interventions (PI) recorded in a national database (ADKA-DokuPIK) were filtered for ICU patients. Binary DDIs involving ≥1 anti-infective agent with >1 database entry were selected. A modified two-step Delphi process with a group of senior hospital pharmacists was employed to evaluate selected DDIs for clinical relevance by using a five-point scale and to develop guidance for clinical practice. In total, 16,173 PI were recorded, including 1836 (11%) DDIs in the ICU setting. Of the latter, 41% (756/1836) included ≥1 anti-infective agent, 32% (590/1836) were binary DDIs, and 25% (455/1836) were listed at least twice. This translates into 88 different DDIs, 74% (65/88) of which were rated as being clinically relevant by our expert panel. The majority of DDIs (76% [67/88]) included macrolides, antifungals, or fluoroquinolones. This percentage was even higher in DDIs being rated as clinically relevant by the experts (85% [55/65]). It is noted that an inter-professional discussion and approach is needed in the individual patient management of DDIs. The guidance developed might be a tool for decision support.Joachim Andreas KoeckHeike HilgarthAndreas von Ameln-MayerhoferDamaris MeynRuediger WarlichAndreas MünstedtDagmar HornChristina KönigMDPI AGarticledrug–drug interactionsclinical pharmacyintensive care unitcritical care pharmacistTherapeutics. PharmacologyRM1-950ENAntibiotics, Vol 10, Iss 1330, p 1330 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
drug–drug interactions clinical pharmacy intensive care unit critical care pharmacist Therapeutics. Pharmacology RM1-950 |
spellingShingle |
drug–drug interactions clinical pharmacy intensive care unit critical care pharmacist Therapeutics. Pharmacology RM1-950 Joachim Andreas Koeck Heike Hilgarth Andreas von Ameln-Mayerhofer Damaris Meyn Ruediger Warlich Andreas Münstedt Dagmar Horn Christina König Clinically Relevant Interactions with Anti-Infectives on Intensive Care Units—A Multicenter Delphi Study |
description |
Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) are at high risk of drug–drug interactions (DDIs) due to polypharmacy. Little is known about type and frequency of DDIs within German ICUs. Clinical pharmacists’ interventions (PI) recorded in a national database (ADKA-DokuPIK) were filtered for ICU patients. Binary DDIs involving ≥1 anti-infective agent with >1 database entry were selected. A modified two-step Delphi process with a group of senior hospital pharmacists was employed to evaluate selected DDIs for clinical relevance by using a five-point scale and to develop guidance for clinical practice. In total, 16,173 PI were recorded, including 1836 (11%) DDIs in the ICU setting. Of the latter, 41% (756/1836) included ≥1 anti-infective agent, 32% (590/1836) were binary DDIs, and 25% (455/1836) were listed at least twice. This translates into 88 different DDIs, 74% (65/88) of which were rated as being clinically relevant by our expert panel. The majority of DDIs (76% [67/88]) included macrolides, antifungals, or fluoroquinolones. This percentage was even higher in DDIs being rated as clinically relevant by the experts (85% [55/65]). It is noted that an inter-professional discussion and approach is needed in the individual patient management of DDIs. The guidance developed might be a tool for decision support. |
format |
article |
author |
Joachim Andreas Koeck Heike Hilgarth Andreas von Ameln-Mayerhofer Damaris Meyn Ruediger Warlich Andreas Münstedt Dagmar Horn Christina König |
author_facet |
Joachim Andreas Koeck Heike Hilgarth Andreas von Ameln-Mayerhofer Damaris Meyn Ruediger Warlich Andreas Münstedt Dagmar Horn Christina König |
author_sort |
Joachim Andreas Koeck |
title |
Clinically Relevant Interactions with Anti-Infectives on Intensive Care Units—A Multicenter Delphi Study |
title_short |
Clinically Relevant Interactions with Anti-Infectives on Intensive Care Units—A Multicenter Delphi Study |
title_full |
Clinically Relevant Interactions with Anti-Infectives on Intensive Care Units—A Multicenter Delphi Study |
title_fullStr |
Clinically Relevant Interactions with Anti-Infectives on Intensive Care Units—A Multicenter Delphi Study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Clinically Relevant Interactions with Anti-Infectives on Intensive Care Units—A Multicenter Delphi Study |
title_sort |
clinically relevant interactions with anti-infectives on intensive care units—a multicenter delphi study |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/a954d48872ce4c0a83e722015168be25 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT joachimandreaskoeck clinicallyrelevantinteractionswithantiinfectivesonintensivecareunitsamulticenterdelphistudy AT heikehilgarth clinicallyrelevantinteractionswithantiinfectivesonintensivecareunitsamulticenterdelphistudy AT andreasvonamelnmayerhofer clinicallyrelevantinteractionswithantiinfectivesonintensivecareunitsamulticenterdelphistudy AT damarismeyn clinicallyrelevantinteractionswithantiinfectivesonintensivecareunitsamulticenterdelphistudy AT ruedigerwarlich clinicallyrelevantinteractionswithantiinfectivesonintensivecareunitsamulticenterdelphistudy AT andreasmunstedt clinicallyrelevantinteractionswithantiinfectivesonintensivecareunitsamulticenterdelphistudy AT dagmarhorn clinicallyrelevantinteractionswithantiinfectivesonintensivecareunitsamulticenterdelphistudy AT christinakonig clinicallyrelevantinteractionswithantiinfectivesonintensivecareunitsamulticenterdelphistudy |
_version_ |
1718413218498478080 |