Clinically Relevant Interactions with Anti-Infectives on Intensive Care Units—A Multicenter Delphi Study

Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) are at high risk of drug–drug interactions (DDIs) due to polypharmacy. Little is known about type and frequency of DDIs within German ICUs. Clinical pharmacists’ interventions (PI) recorded in a national database (ADKA-DokuPIK) were filtered for ICU patients....

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joachim Andreas Koeck, Heike Hilgarth, Andreas von Ameln-Mayerhofer, Damaris Meyn, Ruediger Warlich, Andreas Münstedt, Dagmar Horn, Christina König
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/a954d48872ce4c0a83e722015168be25
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:a954d48872ce4c0a83e722015168be25
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:a954d48872ce4c0a83e722015168be252021-11-25T16:22:55ZClinically Relevant Interactions with Anti-Infectives on Intensive Care Units—A Multicenter Delphi Study10.3390/antibiotics101113302079-6382https://doaj.org/article/a954d48872ce4c0a83e722015168be252021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/10/11/1330https://doaj.org/toc/2079-6382Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) are at high risk of drug–drug interactions (DDIs) due to polypharmacy. Little is known about type and frequency of DDIs within German ICUs. Clinical pharmacists’ interventions (PI) recorded in a national database (ADKA-DokuPIK) were filtered for ICU patients. Binary DDIs involving ≥1 anti-infective agent with >1 database entry were selected. A modified two-step Delphi process with a group of senior hospital pharmacists was employed to evaluate selected DDIs for clinical relevance by using a five-point scale and to develop guidance for clinical practice. In total, 16,173 PI were recorded, including 1836 (11%) DDIs in the ICU setting. Of the latter, 41% (756/1836) included ≥1 anti-infective agent, 32% (590/1836) were binary DDIs, and 25% (455/1836) were listed at least twice. This translates into 88 different DDIs, 74% (65/88) of which were rated as being clinically relevant by our expert panel. The majority of DDIs (76% [67/88]) included macrolides, antifungals, or fluoroquinolones. This percentage was even higher in DDIs being rated as clinically relevant by the experts (85% [55/65]). It is noted that an inter-professional discussion and approach is needed in the individual patient management of DDIs. The guidance developed might be a tool for decision support.Joachim Andreas KoeckHeike HilgarthAndreas von Ameln-MayerhoferDamaris MeynRuediger WarlichAndreas MünstedtDagmar HornChristina KönigMDPI AGarticledrug–drug interactionsclinical pharmacyintensive care unitcritical care pharmacistTherapeutics. PharmacologyRM1-950ENAntibiotics, Vol 10, Iss 1330, p 1330 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic drug–drug interactions
clinical pharmacy
intensive care unit
critical care pharmacist
Therapeutics. Pharmacology
RM1-950
spellingShingle drug–drug interactions
clinical pharmacy
intensive care unit
critical care pharmacist
Therapeutics. Pharmacology
RM1-950
Joachim Andreas Koeck
Heike Hilgarth
Andreas von Ameln-Mayerhofer
Damaris Meyn
Ruediger Warlich
Andreas Münstedt
Dagmar Horn
Christina König
Clinically Relevant Interactions with Anti-Infectives on Intensive Care Units—A Multicenter Delphi Study
description Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) are at high risk of drug–drug interactions (DDIs) due to polypharmacy. Little is known about type and frequency of DDIs within German ICUs. Clinical pharmacists’ interventions (PI) recorded in a national database (ADKA-DokuPIK) were filtered for ICU patients. Binary DDIs involving ≥1 anti-infective agent with >1 database entry were selected. A modified two-step Delphi process with a group of senior hospital pharmacists was employed to evaluate selected DDIs for clinical relevance by using a five-point scale and to develop guidance for clinical practice. In total, 16,173 PI were recorded, including 1836 (11%) DDIs in the ICU setting. Of the latter, 41% (756/1836) included ≥1 anti-infective agent, 32% (590/1836) were binary DDIs, and 25% (455/1836) were listed at least twice. This translates into 88 different DDIs, 74% (65/88) of which were rated as being clinically relevant by our expert panel. The majority of DDIs (76% [67/88]) included macrolides, antifungals, or fluoroquinolones. This percentage was even higher in DDIs being rated as clinically relevant by the experts (85% [55/65]). It is noted that an inter-professional discussion and approach is needed in the individual patient management of DDIs. The guidance developed might be a tool for decision support.
format article
author Joachim Andreas Koeck
Heike Hilgarth
Andreas von Ameln-Mayerhofer
Damaris Meyn
Ruediger Warlich
Andreas Münstedt
Dagmar Horn
Christina König
author_facet Joachim Andreas Koeck
Heike Hilgarth
Andreas von Ameln-Mayerhofer
Damaris Meyn
Ruediger Warlich
Andreas Münstedt
Dagmar Horn
Christina König
author_sort Joachim Andreas Koeck
title Clinically Relevant Interactions with Anti-Infectives on Intensive Care Units—A Multicenter Delphi Study
title_short Clinically Relevant Interactions with Anti-Infectives on Intensive Care Units—A Multicenter Delphi Study
title_full Clinically Relevant Interactions with Anti-Infectives on Intensive Care Units—A Multicenter Delphi Study
title_fullStr Clinically Relevant Interactions with Anti-Infectives on Intensive Care Units—A Multicenter Delphi Study
title_full_unstemmed Clinically Relevant Interactions with Anti-Infectives on Intensive Care Units—A Multicenter Delphi Study
title_sort clinically relevant interactions with anti-infectives on intensive care units—a multicenter delphi study
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/a954d48872ce4c0a83e722015168be25
work_keys_str_mv AT joachimandreaskoeck clinicallyrelevantinteractionswithantiinfectivesonintensivecareunitsamulticenterdelphistudy
AT heikehilgarth clinicallyrelevantinteractionswithantiinfectivesonintensivecareunitsamulticenterdelphistudy
AT andreasvonamelnmayerhofer clinicallyrelevantinteractionswithantiinfectivesonintensivecareunitsamulticenterdelphistudy
AT damarismeyn clinicallyrelevantinteractionswithantiinfectivesonintensivecareunitsamulticenterdelphistudy
AT ruedigerwarlich clinicallyrelevantinteractionswithantiinfectivesonintensivecareunitsamulticenterdelphistudy
AT andreasmunstedt clinicallyrelevantinteractionswithantiinfectivesonintensivecareunitsamulticenterdelphistudy
AT dagmarhorn clinicallyrelevantinteractionswithantiinfectivesonintensivecareunitsamulticenterdelphistudy
AT christinakonig clinicallyrelevantinteractionswithantiinfectivesonintensivecareunitsamulticenterdelphistudy
_version_ 1718413218498478080