The relation between human hair follicle density and touch perception
Abstract Unmyelinated low threshold C-tactile fibers moderate pleasant aspects of touch. These fibers respond optimally to stroking stimulation of the skin with slow velocities (1–10 cm/s). Low threshold mechanoreceptors are arranged around hair follicles in rodent skin. If valid also in humans, hai...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/a991b87104974bd89df03c5500ab4e64 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:a991b87104974bd89df03c5500ab4e64 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:a991b87104974bd89df03c5500ab4e642021-12-02T11:40:13ZThe relation between human hair follicle density and touch perception10.1038/s41598-017-02308-92045-2322https://doaj.org/article/a991b87104974bd89df03c5500ab4e642017-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02308-9https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Unmyelinated low threshold C-tactile fibers moderate pleasant aspects of touch. These fibers respond optimally to stroking stimulation of the skin with slow velocities (1–10 cm/s). Low threshold mechanoreceptors are arranged around hair follicles in rodent skin. If valid also in humans, hair follicle density (HFD) may relate to the perceived pleasantness of stroking tactile stimulation. We conducted two studies that examined the relation between HFD and affective touch perception in humans. In total, 138 healthy volunteers were stroked on the forearm and rated the pleasantness and intensity. Stimulation was performed by a robotic tactile stimulator delivering C-tactile optimal (1, 3, 10 cm/s) and non-optimal (0.1, 0.3, 30 cm/s) stroking velocities. Additionally, a measure of discriminative touch was applied in study 2. HFD of the same forearm was determined using the Cyanoacrylate Skin Stripping Method (CSSM), which we validated in a pretest. Women had higher HFD than men, which was explained by body size and weight. Furthermore, women rated affective touch stimuli as more pleasant and had higher tactile acuity. Depilation did not affect touch perception. A weak relationship was found between the C-tactile specific aspects of affective touch perception and HFD, and the hypothesis of HFD relating to pleasant aspects of stroking only received weak support.Emma H. JönssonJohanna BendasKerstin WeidnerJohan WessbergHåkan OlaussonHelena Backlund WaslingIlona CroyNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2017) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Emma H. Jönsson Johanna Bendas Kerstin Weidner Johan Wessberg Håkan Olausson Helena Backlund Wasling Ilona Croy The relation between human hair follicle density and touch perception |
description |
Abstract Unmyelinated low threshold C-tactile fibers moderate pleasant aspects of touch. These fibers respond optimally to stroking stimulation of the skin with slow velocities (1–10 cm/s). Low threshold mechanoreceptors are arranged around hair follicles in rodent skin. If valid also in humans, hair follicle density (HFD) may relate to the perceived pleasantness of stroking tactile stimulation. We conducted two studies that examined the relation between HFD and affective touch perception in humans. In total, 138 healthy volunteers were stroked on the forearm and rated the pleasantness and intensity. Stimulation was performed by a robotic tactile stimulator delivering C-tactile optimal (1, 3, 10 cm/s) and non-optimal (0.1, 0.3, 30 cm/s) stroking velocities. Additionally, a measure of discriminative touch was applied in study 2. HFD of the same forearm was determined using the Cyanoacrylate Skin Stripping Method (CSSM), which we validated in a pretest. Women had higher HFD than men, which was explained by body size and weight. Furthermore, women rated affective touch stimuli as more pleasant and had higher tactile acuity. Depilation did not affect touch perception. A weak relationship was found between the C-tactile specific aspects of affective touch perception and HFD, and the hypothesis of HFD relating to pleasant aspects of stroking only received weak support. |
format |
article |
author |
Emma H. Jönsson Johanna Bendas Kerstin Weidner Johan Wessberg Håkan Olausson Helena Backlund Wasling Ilona Croy |
author_facet |
Emma H. Jönsson Johanna Bendas Kerstin Weidner Johan Wessberg Håkan Olausson Helena Backlund Wasling Ilona Croy |
author_sort |
Emma H. Jönsson |
title |
The relation between human hair follicle density and touch perception |
title_short |
The relation between human hair follicle density and touch perception |
title_full |
The relation between human hair follicle density and touch perception |
title_fullStr |
The relation between human hair follicle density and touch perception |
title_full_unstemmed |
The relation between human hair follicle density and touch perception |
title_sort |
relation between human hair follicle density and touch perception |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/a991b87104974bd89df03c5500ab4e64 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT emmahjonsson therelationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception AT johannabendas therelationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception AT kerstinweidner therelationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception AT johanwessberg therelationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception AT hakanolausson therelationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception AT helenabacklundwasling therelationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception AT ilonacroy therelationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception AT emmahjonsson relationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception AT johannabendas relationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception AT kerstinweidner relationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception AT johanwessberg relationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception AT hakanolausson relationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception AT helenabacklundwasling relationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception AT ilonacroy relationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception |
_version_ |
1718395718706659328 |