The relation between human hair follicle density and touch perception

Abstract Unmyelinated low threshold C-tactile fibers moderate pleasant aspects of touch. These fibers respond optimally to stroking stimulation of the skin with slow velocities (1–10 cm/s). Low threshold mechanoreceptors are arranged around hair follicles in rodent skin. If valid also in humans, hai...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Emma H. Jönsson, Johanna Bendas, Kerstin Weidner, Johan Wessberg, Håkan Olausson, Helena Backlund Wasling, Ilona Croy
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2017
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/a991b87104974bd89df03c5500ab4e64
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:a991b87104974bd89df03c5500ab4e64
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:a991b87104974bd89df03c5500ab4e642021-12-02T11:40:13ZThe relation between human hair follicle density and touch perception10.1038/s41598-017-02308-92045-2322https://doaj.org/article/a991b87104974bd89df03c5500ab4e642017-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02308-9https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Unmyelinated low threshold C-tactile fibers moderate pleasant aspects of touch. These fibers respond optimally to stroking stimulation of the skin with slow velocities (1–10 cm/s). Low threshold mechanoreceptors are arranged around hair follicles in rodent skin. If valid also in humans, hair follicle density (HFD) may relate to the perceived pleasantness of stroking tactile stimulation. We conducted two studies that examined the relation between HFD and affective touch perception in humans. In total, 138 healthy volunteers were stroked on the forearm and rated the pleasantness and intensity. Stimulation was performed by a robotic tactile stimulator delivering C-tactile optimal (1, 3, 10 cm/s) and non-optimal (0.1, 0.3, 30 cm/s) stroking velocities. Additionally, a measure of discriminative touch was applied in study 2. HFD of the same forearm was determined using the Cyanoacrylate Skin Stripping Method (CSSM), which we validated in a pretest. Women had higher HFD than men, which was explained by body size and weight. Furthermore, women rated affective touch stimuli as more pleasant and had higher tactile acuity. Depilation did not affect touch perception. A weak relationship was found between the C-tactile specific aspects of affective touch perception and HFD, and the hypothesis of HFD relating to pleasant aspects of stroking only received weak support.Emma H. JönssonJohanna BendasKerstin WeidnerJohan WessbergHåkan OlaussonHelena Backlund WaslingIlona CroyNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Emma H. Jönsson
Johanna Bendas
Kerstin Weidner
Johan Wessberg
Håkan Olausson
Helena Backlund Wasling
Ilona Croy
The relation between human hair follicle density and touch perception
description Abstract Unmyelinated low threshold C-tactile fibers moderate pleasant aspects of touch. These fibers respond optimally to stroking stimulation of the skin with slow velocities (1–10 cm/s). Low threshold mechanoreceptors are arranged around hair follicles in rodent skin. If valid also in humans, hair follicle density (HFD) may relate to the perceived pleasantness of stroking tactile stimulation. We conducted two studies that examined the relation between HFD and affective touch perception in humans. In total, 138 healthy volunteers were stroked on the forearm and rated the pleasantness and intensity. Stimulation was performed by a robotic tactile stimulator delivering C-tactile optimal (1, 3, 10 cm/s) and non-optimal (0.1, 0.3, 30 cm/s) stroking velocities. Additionally, a measure of discriminative touch was applied in study 2. HFD of the same forearm was determined using the Cyanoacrylate Skin Stripping Method (CSSM), which we validated in a pretest. Women had higher HFD than men, which was explained by body size and weight. Furthermore, women rated affective touch stimuli as more pleasant and had higher tactile acuity. Depilation did not affect touch perception. A weak relationship was found between the C-tactile specific aspects of affective touch perception and HFD, and the hypothesis of HFD relating to pleasant aspects of stroking only received weak support.
format article
author Emma H. Jönsson
Johanna Bendas
Kerstin Weidner
Johan Wessberg
Håkan Olausson
Helena Backlund Wasling
Ilona Croy
author_facet Emma H. Jönsson
Johanna Bendas
Kerstin Weidner
Johan Wessberg
Håkan Olausson
Helena Backlund Wasling
Ilona Croy
author_sort Emma H. Jönsson
title The relation between human hair follicle density and touch perception
title_short The relation between human hair follicle density and touch perception
title_full The relation between human hair follicle density and touch perception
title_fullStr The relation between human hair follicle density and touch perception
title_full_unstemmed The relation between human hair follicle density and touch perception
title_sort relation between human hair follicle density and touch perception
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/a991b87104974bd89df03c5500ab4e64
work_keys_str_mv AT emmahjonsson therelationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception
AT johannabendas therelationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception
AT kerstinweidner therelationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception
AT johanwessberg therelationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception
AT hakanolausson therelationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception
AT helenabacklundwasling therelationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception
AT ilonacroy therelationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception
AT emmahjonsson relationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception
AT johannabendas relationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception
AT kerstinweidner relationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception
AT johanwessberg relationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception
AT hakanolausson relationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception
AT helenabacklundwasling relationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception
AT ilonacroy relationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception
_version_ 1718395718706659328