Adherence of French GPs to chronic neuropathic pain clinical guidelines: results of a cross-sectional, randomized, "e" case-vignette survey.

<h4>Background and aims</h4>The French Pain Society published guidelines for neuropathic pain management in 2010. Our aim was to evaluate the compliance of GPs with these guidelines three years later.<h4>Methods</h4>We used "e" case vignette methodology for this non...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Valéria Martinez, Nadine Attal, Bertrand Vanzo, Eric Vicaut, Jean Michel Gautier, Didier Bouhassira, Michel Lantéri-Minet
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/a9dbc06ab6114badac16fd22c4409b8b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:a9dbc06ab6114badac16fd22c4409b8b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:a9dbc06ab6114badac16fd22c4409b8b2021-11-18T08:22:29ZAdherence of French GPs to chronic neuropathic pain clinical guidelines: results of a cross-sectional, randomized, "e" case-vignette survey.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0093855https://doaj.org/article/a9dbc06ab6114badac16fd22c4409b8b2014-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24747826/pdf/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background and aims</h4>The French Pain Society published guidelines for neuropathic pain management in 2010. Our aim was to evaluate the compliance of GPs with these guidelines three years later.<h4>Methods</h4>We used "e" case vignette methodology for this non interventional study. A national panel of randomly selected GPs was included. We used eight "e" case-vignettes relating to chronic pain, differing in terms of the type of pain (neuropathic/non neuropathic), etiology (cancer, postoperative pain, low back pain with or without radicular pain, diabetes) and symptoms. GPs received two randomly selected consecutive "e" case vignettes (with/without neuropathic pain). We analyzed their ability to recognize neuropathic pain and to prescribe appropriate first-line treatment.<h4>Results</h4>From the 1265 GPs in the database, we recruited 443 (35.0%), 334 of whom logged onto the web site (26.4%) and 319 (25.2%) of whom completed the survey. Among these GPs, 170 (53.3%) were aware of the guidelines, 136 (42.6%) were able to follow them, and 110 (34.5%) used the DN4 diagnostic tool. Sensitivity for neuropathic pain recognition was 87.8% (CI: 84.2%; 91.4%). However, postoperative neuropathic pain was less well diagnosed (77.9%; CI: 69.6%; 86.2%) than diabetic pain (95.2%; CI: 90.0%; 100.0%), cancer pain (90.6%; CI: 83.5%; 97.8%) and typical radicular pain (90.7%; CI: 84.9%; 96.5%). When neuropathic pain was correctly recognized, the likelihood of appropriate first-line treatment prescription was 90.6% (CI: 87.4%; 93.8%). The treatments proposed were pregabaline (71.8%), gabapentine (43.9%), amiptriptylline (23.2%) and duloxetine (18.2%). However, ibuprofen (11%), acetaminophen-codeine (29.5%) and clonazepam (10%) were still prescribed.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The compliance of GPs with clinical practice guidelines appeared to be satisfactory, but differed between etiologies.Valéria MartinezNadine AttalBertrand VanzoEric VicautJean Michel GautierDidier BouhassiraMichel Lantéri-MinetPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 9, Iss 4, p e93855 (2014)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Valéria Martinez
Nadine Attal
Bertrand Vanzo
Eric Vicaut
Jean Michel Gautier
Didier Bouhassira
Michel Lantéri-Minet
Adherence of French GPs to chronic neuropathic pain clinical guidelines: results of a cross-sectional, randomized, "e" case-vignette survey.
description <h4>Background and aims</h4>The French Pain Society published guidelines for neuropathic pain management in 2010. Our aim was to evaluate the compliance of GPs with these guidelines three years later.<h4>Methods</h4>We used "e" case vignette methodology for this non interventional study. A national panel of randomly selected GPs was included. We used eight "e" case-vignettes relating to chronic pain, differing in terms of the type of pain (neuropathic/non neuropathic), etiology (cancer, postoperative pain, low back pain with or without radicular pain, diabetes) and symptoms. GPs received two randomly selected consecutive "e" case vignettes (with/without neuropathic pain). We analyzed their ability to recognize neuropathic pain and to prescribe appropriate first-line treatment.<h4>Results</h4>From the 1265 GPs in the database, we recruited 443 (35.0%), 334 of whom logged onto the web site (26.4%) and 319 (25.2%) of whom completed the survey. Among these GPs, 170 (53.3%) were aware of the guidelines, 136 (42.6%) were able to follow them, and 110 (34.5%) used the DN4 diagnostic tool. Sensitivity for neuropathic pain recognition was 87.8% (CI: 84.2%; 91.4%). However, postoperative neuropathic pain was less well diagnosed (77.9%; CI: 69.6%; 86.2%) than diabetic pain (95.2%; CI: 90.0%; 100.0%), cancer pain (90.6%; CI: 83.5%; 97.8%) and typical radicular pain (90.7%; CI: 84.9%; 96.5%). When neuropathic pain was correctly recognized, the likelihood of appropriate first-line treatment prescription was 90.6% (CI: 87.4%; 93.8%). The treatments proposed were pregabaline (71.8%), gabapentine (43.9%), amiptriptylline (23.2%) and duloxetine (18.2%). However, ibuprofen (11%), acetaminophen-codeine (29.5%) and clonazepam (10%) were still prescribed.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The compliance of GPs with clinical practice guidelines appeared to be satisfactory, but differed between etiologies.
format article
author Valéria Martinez
Nadine Attal
Bertrand Vanzo
Eric Vicaut
Jean Michel Gautier
Didier Bouhassira
Michel Lantéri-Minet
author_facet Valéria Martinez
Nadine Attal
Bertrand Vanzo
Eric Vicaut
Jean Michel Gautier
Didier Bouhassira
Michel Lantéri-Minet
author_sort Valéria Martinez
title Adherence of French GPs to chronic neuropathic pain clinical guidelines: results of a cross-sectional, randomized, "e" case-vignette survey.
title_short Adherence of French GPs to chronic neuropathic pain clinical guidelines: results of a cross-sectional, randomized, "e" case-vignette survey.
title_full Adherence of French GPs to chronic neuropathic pain clinical guidelines: results of a cross-sectional, randomized, "e" case-vignette survey.
title_fullStr Adherence of French GPs to chronic neuropathic pain clinical guidelines: results of a cross-sectional, randomized, "e" case-vignette survey.
title_full_unstemmed Adherence of French GPs to chronic neuropathic pain clinical guidelines: results of a cross-sectional, randomized, "e" case-vignette survey.
title_sort adherence of french gps to chronic neuropathic pain clinical guidelines: results of a cross-sectional, randomized, "e" case-vignette survey.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2014
url https://doaj.org/article/a9dbc06ab6114badac16fd22c4409b8b
work_keys_str_mv AT valeriamartinez adherenceoffrenchgpstochronicneuropathicpainclinicalguidelinesresultsofacrosssectionalrandomizedecasevignettesurvey
AT nadineattal adherenceoffrenchgpstochronicneuropathicpainclinicalguidelinesresultsofacrosssectionalrandomizedecasevignettesurvey
AT bertrandvanzo adherenceoffrenchgpstochronicneuropathicpainclinicalguidelinesresultsofacrosssectionalrandomizedecasevignettesurvey
AT ericvicaut adherenceoffrenchgpstochronicneuropathicpainclinicalguidelinesresultsofacrosssectionalrandomizedecasevignettesurvey
AT jeanmichelgautier adherenceoffrenchgpstochronicneuropathicpainclinicalguidelinesresultsofacrosssectionalrandomizedecasevignettesurvey
AT didierbouhassira adherenceoffrenchgpstochronicneuropathicpainclinicalguidelinesresultsofacrosssectionalrandomizedecasevignettesurvey
AT michellanteriminet adherenceoffrenchgpstochronicneuropathicpainclinicalguidelinesresultsofacrosssectionalrandomizedecasevignettesurvey
_version_ 1718421880179785728