Perspectives of Documentality
Social ontology has experienced significative growth in the last decades. In particular, a promising research agenda concerns social objects. The reference to social objects implies sharing a realistic conception of the world which allows a definitive departure from the post-modern vision of the so...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN FR IT |
Publicado: |
Rosenberg & Sellier
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/a9e830b748db48a6a0dd9bcaf080b707 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:a9e830b748db48a6a0dd9bcaf080b707 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:a9e830b748db48a6a0dd9bcaf080b7072021-12-02T10:31:06ZPerspectives of Documentality10.13128/Phe_Mi-196222280-78532239-4028https://doaj.org/article/a9e830b748db48a6a0dd9bcaf080b7072016-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://oaj.fupress.net/index.php/pam/article/view/7069https://doaj.org/toc/2280-7853https://doaj.org/toc/2239-4028 Social ontology has experienced significative growth in the last decades. In particular, a promising research agenda concerns social objects. The reference to social objects implies sharing a realistic conception of the world which allows a definitive departure from the post-modern vision of the social world as a fluid and elusive organism. A taxonomy that distinguishes between social, physical and ideal objects can, on the contrary, reinvigorate human sciences getting over the well-known methodological controversies of the last years. The theory of Documentality provides heuristic power and a solid basis for organisational resources: all potentially reliable sources for the web society. Documentality theory aims to represent a valid alternative to Searle ontology, and at the same time to offer both theoretical and practical developments. Maurizio FerrarisRosenberg & Sellierarticledocumentalitysocial ontologysocial objectshuman sciencesweb societyAestheticsBH1-301EthicsBJ1-1725ENFRITPhenomenology and Mind, Iss 2 (2016) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN FR IT |
topic |
documentality social ontology social objects human sciences web society Aesthetics BH1-301 Ethics BJ1-1725 |
spellingShingle |
documentality social ontology social objects human sciences web society Aesthetics BH1-301 Ethics BJ1-1725 Maurizio Ferraris Perspectives of Documentality |
description |
Social ontology has experienced significative growth in the last decades. In particular, a promising research agenda concerns social objects. The reference to social objects implies sharing a realistic conception of the world which allows a definitive departure from the post-modern vision of the social world as a fluid and elusive organism. A taxonomy that distinguishes between social, physical and ideal objects can, on the contrary, reinvigorate human sciences getting over the well-known methodological controversies of the last years. The theory of Documentality provides heuristic power and a solid basis for organisational resources: all potentially reliable sources for the web society. Documentality theory aims to represent a valid alternative to Searle ontology, and at the same time to offer both theoretical and practical developments.
|
format |
article |
author |
Maurizio Ferraris |
author_facet |
Maurizio Ferraris |
author_sort |
Maurizio Ferraris |
title |
Perspectives of Documentality |
title_short |
Perspectives of Documentality |
title_full |
Perspectives of Documentality |
title_fullStr |
Perspectives of Documentality |
title_full_unstemmed |
Perspectives of Documentality |
title_sort |
perspectives of documentality |
publisher |
Rosenberg & Sellier |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/a9e830b748db48a6a0dd9bcaf080b707 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT maurizioferraris perspectivesofdocumentality |
_version_ |
1718397134173110272 |