A prospective, randomized, fellow eye comparison of WaveLight® Allegretto Wave® Eye-Q versus VISX CustomVue™ STAR S4 IR™ in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK): analysis of visual outcomes and higher order aberrations

Majid Moshirfar1, Brent S Betts2, Daniel S Churgin3, Maylon Hsu1, Marcus Neuffer1, Shameema Sikder4, Dane Church5, Mark D Mifflin11John A Moran Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; 2Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moshirfar M, Betts BS, Churgin DS, Hsu M, Neuffer M, Sikder S, Church D, Mifflin MD
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/a9eabbbb898c43869919abf9637881fc
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:a9eabbbb898c43869919abf9637881fc
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:a9eabbbb898c43869919abf9637881fc2021-12-02T03:00:45ZA prospective, randomized, fellow eye comparison of WaveLight® Allegretto Wave® Eye-Q versus VISX CustomVue™ STAR S4 IR™ in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK): analysis of visual outcomes and higher order aberrations1177-54671177-5483https://doaj.org/article/a9eabbbb898c43869919abf9637881fc2011-09-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.dovepress.com/a-prospective-randomized-fellow-eye-comparison-of-wavelightreg-allegre-a8316https://doaj.org/toc/1177-5467https://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483Majid Moshirfar1, Brent S Betts2, Daniel S Churgin3, Maylon Hsu1, Marcus Neuffer1, Shameema Sikder4, Dane Church5, Mark D Mifflin11John A Moran Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; 2Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA; 3University of Arizona College of Medicine – Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA; 4Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; 5Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USAPurpose: To compare outcomes in visual acuity, refractive error, higher-order aberrations (HOAs), contrast sensitivity, and dry eye in patients undergoing laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using wavefront (WF) guided VISX CustomVue and WF optimized WaveLight Allegretto platforms.Methods: In this randomized, prospective, single-masked, fellow eye study, LASIK was performed on 44 eyes (22 patients), with one eye randomized to WaveLight Allegretto, and the fellow eye receiving VISX CustomVue. Postoperative outcome measures at 3 months included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), refractive error, root-mean-square (RMS) value of total and grouped HOAs, contrast sensitivity, and Schirmers testing.Results: Mean values for UDVA (logMAR) were -0.067 ± 0.087 and -0.073 ± 0.092 in the WF optimized and WF guided groups, respectively (P = 0.909). UDVA of 20/20 or better was achieved in 91% of eyes undergoing LASIK with both lasers while UDVA of 20/15 or better was achieved in 64% of eyes using the Allegretto platform, and 59% of eyes using VISX CustomVue (P = 1.000). In the WF optimized group, total HOA increased 4% (P = 0.012), coma increased 11% (P = 0.065), and spherical aberration increased 19% (P = 0.214), while trefoil decreased 5% (P = 0.490). In the WF guided group, total HOA RMS decreased 9% (P = 0.126), coma decreased 18% (P = 0.144), spherical aberration decreased 27% (P = 0.713) and trefoil decreased 19% (P = 0.660). One patient lost one line of CDVA secondary to residual irregular astigmatism.Conclusion: Both the WaveLight Allegretto and the VISX CustomVue platforms had equal visual and safety outcomes. Most wavefront optimized HOA values trended upward, with a statistically significant increase in total HOA RMS. Eyes treated with the WF guided platform showed a decreasing trend in HOA values.Keywords: wavefront guided, wavefront optimized, laser in situ keratomileusis, LASIK, Allegretto, VISXMoshirfar MBetts BSChurgin DSHsu MNeuffer MSikder SChurch DMifflin MDDove Medical PressarticleOphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol 2011, Iss default, Pp 1339-1347 (2011)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Ophthalmology
RE1-994
spellingShingle Ophthalmology
RE1-994
Moshirfar M
Betts BS
Churgin DS
Hsu M
Neuffer M
Sikder S
Church D
Mifflin MD
A prospective, randomized, fellow eye comparison of WaveLight® Allegretto Wave® Eye-Q versus VISX CustomVue™ STAR S4 IR™ in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK): analysis of visual outcomes and higher order aberrations
description Majid Moshirfar1, Brent S Betts2, Daniel S Churgin3, Maylon Hsu1, Marcus Neuffer1, Shameema Sikder4, Dane Church5, Mark D Mifflin11John A Moran Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; 2Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA; 3University of Arizona College of Medicine – Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA; 4Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; 5Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USAPurpose: To compare outcomes in visual acuity, refractive error, higher-order aberrations (HOAs), contrast sensitivity, and dry eye in patients undergoing laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using wavefront (WF) guided VISX CustomVue and WF optimized WaveLight Allegretto platforms.Methods: In this randomized, prospective, single-masked, fellow eye study, LASIK was performed on 44 eyes (22 patients), with one eye randomized to WaveLight Allegretto, and the fellow eye receiving VISX CustomVue. Postoperative outcome measures at 3 months included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), refractive error, root-mean-square (RMS) value of total and grouped HOAs, contrast sensitivity, and Schirmers testing.Results: Mean values for UDVA (logMAR) were -0.067 ± 0.087 and -0.073 ± 0.092 in the WF optimized and WF guided groups, respectively (P = 0.909). UDVA of 20/20 or better was achieved in 91% of eyes undergoing LASIK with both lasers while UDVA of 20/15 or better was achieved in 64% of eyes using the Allegretto platform, and 59% of eyes using VISX CustomVue (P = 1.000). In the WF optimized group, total HOA increased 4% (P = 0.012), coma increased 11% (P = 0.065), and spherical aberration increased 19% (P = 0.214), while trefoil decreased 5% (P = 0.490). In the WF guided group, total HOA RMS decreased 9% (P = 0.126), coma decreased 18% (P = 0.144), spherical aberration decreased 27% (P = 0.713) and trefoil decreased 19% (P = 0.660). One patient lost one line of CDVA secondary to residual irregular astigmatism.Conclusion: Both the WaveLight Allegretto and the VISX CustomVue platforms had equal visual and safety outcomes. Most wavefront optimized HOA values trended upward, with a statistically significant increase in total HOA RMS. Eyes treated with the WF guided platform showed a decreasing trend in HOA values.Keywords: wavefront guided, wavefront optimized, laser in situ keratomileusis, LASIK, Allegretto, VISX
format article
author Moshirfar M
Betts BS
Churgin DS
Hsu M
Neuffer M
Sikder S
Church D
Mifflin MD
author_facet Moshirfar M
Betts BS
Churgin DS
Hsu M
Neuffer M
Sikder S
Church D
Mifflin MD
author_sort Moshirfar M
title A prospective, randomized, fellow eye comparison of WaveLight® Allegretto Wave® Eye-Q versus VISX CustomVue™ STAR S4 IR™ in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK): analysis of visual outcomes and higher order aberrations
title_short A prospective, randomized, fellow eye comparison of WaveLight® Allegretto Wave® Eye-Q versus VISX CustomVue™ STAR S4 IR™ in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK): analysis of visual outcomes and higher order aberrations
title_full A prospective, randomized, fellow eye comparison of WaveLight® Allegretto Wave® Eye-Q versus VISX CustomVue™ STAR S4 IR™ in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK): analysis of visual outcomes and higher order aberrations
title_fullStr A prospective, randomized, fellow eye comparison of WaveLight® Allegretto Wave® Eye-Q versus VISX CustomVue™ STAR S4 IR™ in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK): analysis of visual outcomes and higher order aberrations
title_full_unstemmed A prospective, randomized, fellow eye comparison of WaveLight® Allegretto Wave® Eye-Q versus VISX CustomVue™ STAR S4 IR™ in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK): analysis of visual outcomes and higher order aberrations
title_sort prospective, randomized, fellow eye comparison of wavelight® allegretto wave® eye-q versus visx customvue™ star s4 ir™ in laser in situ keratomileusis (lasik): analysis of visual outcomes and higher order aberrations
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2011
url https://doaj.org/article/a9eabbbb898c43869919abf9637881fc
work_keys_str_mv AT moshirfarm aprospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightampregallegrettowaveampregeyeqversusvisxcustomvueamptradestars4iramptradeinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations
AT bettsbs aprospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightampregallegrettowaveampregeyeqversusvisxcustomvueamptradestars4iramptradeinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations
AT churginds aprospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightampregallegrettowaveampregeyeqversusvisxcustomvueamptradestars4iramptradeinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations
AT hsum aprospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightampregallegrettowaveampregeyeqversusvisxcustomvueamptradestars4iramptradeinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations
AT neufferm aprospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightampregallegrettowaveampregeyeqversusvisxcustomvueamptradestars4iramptradeinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations
AT sikders aprospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightampregallegrettowaveampregeyeqversusvisxcustomvueamptradestars4iramptradeinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations
AT churchd aprospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightampregallegrettowaveampregeyeqversusvisxcustomvueamptradestars4iramptradeinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations
AT mifflinmd aprospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightampregallegrettowaveampregeyeqversusvisxcustomvueamptradestars4iramptradeinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations
AT moshirfarm prospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightampregallegrettowaveampregeyeqversusvisxcustomvueamptradestars4iramptradeinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations
AT bettsbs prospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightampregallegrettowaveampregeyeqversusvisxcustomvueamptradestars4iramptradeinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations
AT churginds prospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightampregallegrettowaveampregeyeqversusvisxcustomvueamptradestars4iramptradeinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations
AT hsum prospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightampregallegrettowaveampregeyeqversusvisxcustomvueamptradestars4iramptradeinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations
AT neufferm prospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightampregallegrettowaveampregeyeqversusvisxcustomvueamptradestars4iramptradeinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations
AT sikders prospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightampregallegrettowaveampregeyeqversusvisxcustomvueamptradestars4iramptradeinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations
AT churchd prospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightampregallegrettowaveampregeyeqversusvisxcustomvueamptradestars4iramptradeinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations
AT mifflinmd prospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightampregallegrettowaveampregeyeqversusvisxcustomvueamptradestars4iramptradeinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations
_version_ 1718402001355669504