A prospective, randomized, fellow eye comparison of WaveLight® Allegretto Wave® Eye-Q versus VISX CustomVue™ STAR S4 IR™ in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK): analysis of visual outcomes and higher order aberrations
Majid Moshirfar1, Brent S Betts2, Daniel S Churgin3, Maylon Hsu1, Marcus Neuffer1, Shameema Sikder4, Dane Church5, Mark D Mifflin11John A Moran Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; 2Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphi...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/a9eabbbb898c43869919abf9637881fc |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:a9eabbbb898c43869919abf9637881fc |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:a9eabbbb898c43869919abf9637881fc2021-12-02T03:00:45ZA prospective, randomized, fellow eye comparison of WaveLight® Allegretto Wave® Eye-Q versus VISX CustomVue™ STAR S4 IR™ in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK): analysis of visual outcomes and higher order aberrations1177-54671177-5483https://doaj.org/article/a9eabbbb898c43869919abf9637881fc2011-09-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.dovepress.com/a-prospective-randomized-fellow-eye-comparison-of-wavelightreg-allegre-a8316https://doaj.org/toc/1177-5467https://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483Majid Moshirfar1, Brent S Betts2, Daniel S Churgin3, Maylon Hsu1, Marcus Neuffer1, Shameema Sikder4, Dane Church5, Mark D Mifflin11John A Moran Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; 2Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA; 3University of Arizona College of Medicine – Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA; 4Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; 5Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USAPurpose: To compare outcomes in visual acuity, refractive error, higher-order aberrations (HOAs), contrast sensitivity, and dry eye in patients undergoing laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using wavefront (WF) guided VISX CustomVue and WF optimized WaveLight Allegretto platforms.Methods: In this randomized, prospective, single-masked, fellow eye study, LASIK was performed on 44 eyes (22 patients), with one eye randomized to WaveLight Allegretto, and the fellow eye receiving VISX CustomVue. Postoperative outcome measures at 3 months included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), refractive error, root-mean-square (RMS) value of total and grouped HOAs, contrast sensitivity, and Schirmers testing.Results: Mean values for UDVA (logMAR) were -0.067 ± 0.087 and -0.073 ± 0.092 in the WF optimized and WF guided groups, respectively (P = 0.909). UDVA of 20/20 or better was achieved in 91% of eyes undergoing LASIK with both lasers while UDVA of 20/15 or better was achieved in 64% of eyes using the Allegretto platform, and 59% of eyes using VISX CustomVue (P = 1.000). In the WF optimized group, total HOA increased 4% (P = 0.012), coma increased 11% (P = 0.065), and spherical aberration increased 19% (P = 0.214), while trefoil decreased 5% (P = 0.490). In the WF guided group, total HOA RMS decreased 9% (P = 0.126), coma decreased 18% (P = 0.144), spherical aberration decreased 27% (P = 0.713) and trefoil decreased 19% (P = 0.660). One patient lost one line of CDVA secondary to residual irregular astigmatism.Conclusion: Both the WaveLight Allegretto and the VISX CustomVue platforms had equal visual and safety outcomes. Most wavefront optimized HOA values trended upward, with a statistically significant increase in total HOA RMS. Eyes treated with the WF guided platform showed a decreasing trend in HOA values.Keywords: wavefront guided, wavefront optimized, laser in situ keratomileusis, LASIK, Allegretto, VISXMoshirfar MBetts BSChurgin DSHsu MNeuffer MSikder SChurch DMifflin MDDove Medical PressarticleOphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol 2011, Iss default, Pp 1339-1347 (2011) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Ophthalmology RE1-994 |
spellingShingle |
Ophthalmology RE1-994 Moshirfar M Betts BS Churgin DS Hsu M Neuffer M Sikder S Church D Mifflin MD A prospective, randomized, fellow eye comparison of WaveLight® Allegretto Wave® Eye-Q versus VISX CustomVue™ STAR S4 IR™ in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK): analysis of visual outcomes and higher order aberrations |
description |
Majid Moshirfar1, Brent S Betts2, Daniel S Churgin3, Maylon Hsu1, Marcus Neuffer1, Shameema Sikder4, Dane Church5, Mark D Mifflin11John A Moran Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; 2Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA; 3University of Arizona College of Medicine – Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA; 4Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; 5Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USAPurpose: To compare outcomes in visual acuity, refractive error, higher-order aberrations (HOAs), contrast sensitivity, and dry eye in patients undergoing laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using wavefront (WF) guided VISX CustomVue and WF optimized WaveLight Allegretto platforms.Methods: In this randomized, prospective, single-masked, fellow eye study, LASIK was performed on 44 eyes (22 patients), with one eye randomized to WaveLight Allegretto, and the fellow eye receiving VISX CustomVue. Postoperative outcome measures at 3 months included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), refractive error, root-mean-square (RMS) value of total and grouped HOAs, contrast sensitivity, and Schirmers testing.Results: Mean values for UDVA (logMAR) were -0.067 ± 0.087 and -0.073 ± 0.092 in the WF optimized and WF guided groups, respectively (P = 0.909). UDVA of 20/20 or better was achieved in 91% of eyes undergoing LASIK with both lasers while UDVA of 20/15 or better was achieved in 64% of eyes using the Allegretto platform, and 59% of eyes using VISX CustomVue (P = 1.000). In the WF optimized group, total HOA increased 4% (P = 0.012), coma increased 11% (P = 0.065), and spherical aberration increased 19% (P = 0.214), while trefoil decreased 5% (P = 0.490). In the WF guided group, total HOA RMS decreased 9% (P = 0.126), coma decreased 18% (P = 0.144), spherical aberration decreased 27% (P = 0.713) and trefoil decreased 19% (P = 0.660). One patient lost one line of CDVA secondary to residual irregular astigmatism.Conclusion: Both the WaveLight Allegretto and the VISX CustomVue platforms had equal visual and safety outcomes. Most wavefront optimized HOA values trended upward, with a statistically significant increase in total HOA RMS. Eyes treated with the WF guided platform showed a decreasing trend in HOA values.Keywords: wavefront guided, wavefront optimized, laser in situ keratomileusis, LASIK, Allegretto, VISX |
format |
article |
author |
Moshirfar M Betts BS Churgin DS Hsu M Neuffer M Sikder S Church D Mifflin MD |
author_facet |
Moshirfar M Betts BS Churgin DS Hsu M Neuffer M Sikder S Church D Mifflin MD |
author_sort |
Moshirfar M |
title |
A prospective, randomized, fellow eye comparison of WaveLight® Allegretto Wave® Eye-Q versus VISX CustomVue™ STAR S4 IR™ in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK): analysis of visual outcomes and higher order aberrations |
title_short |
A prospective, randomized, fellow eye comparison of WaveLight® Allegretto Wave® Eye-Q versus VISX CustomVue™ STAR S4 IR™ in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK): analysis of visual outcomes and higher order aberrations |
title_full |
A prospective, randomized, fellow eye comparison of WaveLight® Allegretto Wave® Eye-Q versus VISX CustomVue™ STAR S4 IR™ in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK): analysis of visual outcomes and higher order aberrations |
title_fullStr |
A prospective, randomized, fellow eye comparison of WaveLight® Allegretto Wave® Eye-Q versus VISX CustomVue™ STAR S4 IR™ in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK): analysis of visual outcomes and higher order aberrations |
title_full_unstemmed |
A prospective, randomized, fellow eye comparison of WaveLight® Allegretto Wave® Eye-Q versus VISX CustomVue™ STAR S4 IR™ in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK): analysis of visual outcomes and higher order aberrations |
title_sort |
prospective, randomized, fellow eye comparison of wavelight® allegretto wave® eye-q versus visx customvue™ star s4 ir™ in laser in situ keratomileusis (lasik): analysis of visual outcomes and higher order aberrations |
publisher |
Dove Medical Press |
publishDate |
2011 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/a9eabbbb898c43869919abf9637881fc |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT moshirfarm aprospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightampregallegrettowaveampregeyeqversusvisxcustomvueamptradestars4iramptradeinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations AT bettsbs aprospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightampregallegrettowaveampregeyeqversusvisxcustomvueamptradestars4iramptradeinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations AT churginds aprospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightampregallegrettowaveampregeyeqversusvisxcustomvueamptradestars4iramptradeinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations AT hsum aprospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightampregallegrettowaveampregeyeqversusvisxcustomvueamptradestars4iramptradeinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations AT neufferm aprospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightampregallegrettowaveampregeyeqversusvisxcustomvueamptradestars4iramptradeinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations AT sikders aprospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightampregallegrettowaveampregeyeqversusvisxcustomvueamptradestars4iramptradeinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations AT churchd aprospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightampregallegrettowaveampregeyeqversusvisxcustomvueamptradestars4iramptradeinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations AT mifflinmd aprospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightampregallegrettowaveampregeyeqversusvisxcustomvueamptradestars4iramptradeinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations AT moshirfarm prospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightampregallegrettowaveampregeyeqversusvisxcustomvueamptradestars4iramptradeinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations AT bettsbs prospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightampregallegrettowaveampregeyeqversusvisxcustomvueamptradestars4iramptradeinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations AT churginds prospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightampregallegrettowaveampregeyeqversusvisxcustomvueamptradestars4iramptradeinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations AT hsum prospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightampregallegrettowaveampregeyeqversusvisxcustomvueamptradestars4iramptradeinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations AT neufferm prospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightampregallegrettowaveampregeyeqversusvisxcustomvueamptradestars4iramptradeinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations AT sikders prospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightampregallegrettowaveampregeyeqversusvisxcustomvueamptradestars4iramptradeinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations AT churchd prospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightampregallegrettowaveampregeyeqversusvisxcustomvueamptradestars4iramptradeinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations AT mifflinmd prospectiverandomizedfelloweyecomparisonofwavelightampregallegrettowaveampregeyeqversusvisxcustomvueamptradestars4iramptradeinlaserinsitukeratomileusislasikanalysisofvisualoutcomesandhigherorderaberrations |
_version_ |
1718402001355669504 |