The importance of selecting the correct site to apply spinal manipulation when treating spinal pain: Myth or reality? A systematic review
Abstract The concept that spinal manipulation therapy (SMT) outcomes are optimized when the treatment is aimed at a clinically relevant joint is commonly assumed and central to teaching and clinical use (candidate sites). This systematic review investigated whether clinical effects are superior when...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Casper G. Nim, Aron Downie, Søren O’Neill, Gregory N. Kawchuk, Stephen M. Perle, Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/aa21cffdb90f404eb794fd8fdcb1e689 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
The effect on clinical outcomes when targeting spinal manipulation at stiffness or pain sensitivity: a randomized trial
por: Casper Glissmann Nim, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
The quality of reports on cervical arterial dissection following cervical spinal manipulation.
por: Shari Wynd, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
A comparison of spinal manipulation with physical therapy for treatment of patients with mechanical low back pain
por: M Rayegani, et al.
Publicado: (2002) -
Surgical Oncology Myth or Reality
por: Remy J Salmon
Publicado: (2021) -
A Human: Myths and Reality
por: M. V. Silantyeva
Publicado: (2013)