A Short Version of the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale: Development and Psychometric Properties

Objective: The purposes of this paper were to (a) develop a new short, theory-driven, version of the physical activity enjoyment scale (PACES-S) using content analysis; and (b) subsequently to measure the psychometric properties (construct validity, internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheng Chen, Susanne Weyland, Julian Fritsch, Alexander Woll, Claudia Niessner, Alexander Burchartz, Steffen C. E. Schmidt, Darko Jekauc
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/aab572b15d334358a4bfa7c2ed575369
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:aab572b15d334358a4bfa7c2ed575369
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:aab572b15d334358a4bfa7c2ed5753692021-11-11T16:11:15ZA Short Version of the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale: Development and Psychometric Properties10.3390/ijerph1821110351660-46011661-7827https://doaj.org/article/aab572b15d334358a4bfa7c2ed5753692021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11035https://doaj.org/toc/1661-7827https://doaj.org/toc/1660-4601Objective: The purposes of this paper were to (a) develop a new short, theory-driven, version of the physical activity enjoyment scale (PACES-S) using content analysis; and (b) subsequently to measure the psychometric properties (construct validity, internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and concurrent validity) of the PACES-S for adolescents. Methods: Six experts used a four-point Likert scale to assess the content validity of each of the 16 items of the physical activity enjoyment scale according to a provided definition of physical activity enjoyment. Based on the results, exploratory factor analysis was used to analyze survey data from a longitudinal study of 182 individuals (Measure 1 of Study 1: 15.75 ± 3.39 yrs; 56.6% boys, 43.4% girls), and confirmatory factor analysis (Measure 2 of Study 1: 15.69 ± 3.44 yrs; 56.3% boys, 43.7% girls) was used to analyze the survey data from a cross-sectional study of 3219 individuals (Study 2; 15.99 ± 3.10 yrs; 47.8% boys, 52.2% girls) to assess the construct validity of the new measure. To assess the reliability, test–retest reliability was assessed in Study 1 and internal consistency in Study 1 and 2. For the concurrent validity, correlations with self-reported and device-based physical activity behavior were assessed in both studies. Results: Four out of sixteen items were selected for PACES-S. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analyses identified and supported its factorial validity (χ<sup>2</sup> = 53.62, df = 2, <i>p</i> < 0.001; RMSEA = 0.073; CFI = 0.99; RFI = 0.96; NFI = 0.99; TLI = 0.96; IFI = 0.99). Results showed good test–retest reliability (r = 0.76) and internal consistency (<i>a</i> = 0.82 to 0.88). Regarding concurrent validity, the results showed positive correlations with a physical activity questionnaire (Study 1: r = 0.36), with a physical activity diary (Study 1: r = 0.44), and with accelerometer-recorded data (Study 1: r = 0.32; Study 2: r = 0.21). Conclusions: The results indicate that PACES-S is a reliable and valid instrument that may be particularly useful to measure physical activity enjoyment in large-scale studies. It shows comparable measurement properties as the long version of PACES.Cheng ChenSusanne WeylandJulian FritschAlexander WollClaudia NiessnerAlexander BurchartzSteffen C. E. SchmidtDarko JekaucMDPI AGarticlecontent analysisPACESphysical activityreliabilityvalidityMedicineRENInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol 18, Iss 11035, p 11035 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic content analysis
PACES
physical activity
reliability
validity
Medicine
R
spellingShingle content analysis
PACES
physical activity
reliability
validity
Medicine
R
Cheng Chen
Susanne Weyland
Julian Fritsch
Alexander Woll
Claudia Niessner
Alexander Burchartz
Steffen C. E. Schmidt
Darko Jekauc
A Short Version of the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale: Development and Psychometric Properties
description Objective: The purposes of this paper were to (a) develop a new short, theory-driven, version of the physical activity enjoyment scale (PACES-S) using content analysis; and (b) subsequently to measure the psychometric properties (construct validity, internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and concurrent validity) of the PACES-S for adolescents. Methods: Six experts used a four-point Likert scale to assess the content validity of each of the 16 items of the physical activity enjoyment scale according to a provided definition of physical activity enjoyment. Based on the results, exploratory factor analysis was used to analyze survey data from a longitudinal study of 182 individuals (Measure 1 of Study 1: 15.75 ± 3.39 yrs; 56.6% boys, 43.4% girls), and confirmatory factor analysis (Measure 2 of Study 1: 15.69 ± 3.44 yrs; 56.3% boys, 43.7% girls) was used to analyze the survey data from a cross-sectional study of 3219 individuals (Study 2; 15.99 ± 3.10 yrs; 47.8% boys, 52.2% girls) to assess the construct validity of the new measure. To assess the reliability, test–retest reliability was assessed in Study 1 and internal consistency in Study 1 and 2. For the concurrent validity, correlations with self-reported and device-based physical activity behavior were assessed in both studies. Results: Four out of sixteen items were selected for PACES-S. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analyses identified and supported its factorial validity (χ<sup>2</sup> = 53.62, df = 2, <i>p</i> < 0.001; RMSEA = 0.073; CFI = 0.99; RFI = 0.96; NFI = 0.99; TLI = 0.96; IFI = 0.99). Results showed good test–retest reliability (r = 0.76) and internal consistency (<i>a</i> = 0.82 to 0.88). Regarding concurrent validity, the results showed positive correlations with a physical activity questionnaire (Study 1: r = 0.36), with a physical activity diary (Study 1: r = 0.44), and with accelerometer-recorded data (Study 1: r = 0.32; Study 2: r = 0.21). Conclusions: The results indicate that PACES-S is a reliable and valid instrument that may be particularly useful to measure physical activity enjoyment in large-scale studies. It shows comparable measurement properties as the long version of PACES.
format article
author Cheng Chen
Susanne Weyland
Julian Fritsch
Alexander Woll
Claudia Niessner
Alexander Burchartz
Steffen C. E. Schmidt
Darko Jekauc
author_facet Cheng Chen
Susanne Weyland
Julian Fritsch
Alexander Woll
Claudia Niessner
Alexander Burchartz
Steffen C. E. Schmidt
Darko Jekauc
author_sort Cheng Chen
title A Short Version of the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale: Development and Psychometric Properties
title_short A Short Version of the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale: Development and Psychometric Properties
title_full A Short Version of the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale: Development and Psychometric Properties
title_fullStr A Short Version of the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale: Development and Psychometric Properties
title_full_unstemmed A Short Version of the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale: Development and Psychometric Properties
title_sort short version of the physical activity enjoyment scale: development and psychometric properties
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/aab572b15d334358a4bfa7c2ed575369
work_keys_str_mv AT chengchen ashortversionofthephysicalactivityenjoymentscaledevelopmentandpsychometricproperties
AT susanneweyland ashortversionofthephysicalactivityenjoymentscaledevelopmentandpsychometricproperties
AT julianfritsch ashortversionofthephysicalactivityenjoymentscaledevelopmentandpsychometricproperties
AT alexanderwoll ashortversionofthephysicalactivityenjoymentscaledevelopmentandpsychometricproperties
AT claudianiessner ashortversionofthephysicalactivityenjoymentscaledevelopmentandpsychometricproperties
AT alexanderburchartz ashortversionofthephysicalactivityenjoymentscaledevelopmentandpsychometricproperties
AT steffenceschmidt ashortversionofthephysicalactivityenjoymentscaledevelopmentandpsychometricproperties
AT darkojekauc ashortversionofthephysicalactivityenjoymentscaledevelopmentandpsychometricproperties
AT chengchen shortversionofthephysicalactivityenjoymentscaledevelopmentandpsychometricproperties
AT susanneweyland shortversionofthephysicalactivityenjoymentscaledevelopmentandpsychometricproperties
AT julianfritsch shortversionofthephysicalactivityenjoymentscaledevelopmentandpsychometricproperties
AT alexanderwoll shortversionofthephysicalactivityenjoymentscaledevelopmentandpsychometricproperties
AT claudianiessner shortversionofthephysicalactivityenjoymentscaledevelopmentandpsychometricproperties
AT alexanderburchartz shortversionofthephysicalactivityenjoymentscaledevelopmentandpsychometricproperties
AT steffenceschmidt shortversionofthephysicalactivityenjoymentscaledevelopmentandpsychometricproperties
AT darkojekauc shortversionofthephysicalactivityenjoymentscaledevelopmentandpsychometricproperties
_version_ 1718432376388845568