Larger muscle fibers and fiber bundles manifest smaller elastic modulus in paraspinal muscles of rats and humans

Abstract The passive elastic modulus of muscle fiber appears to be size-dependent. The objectives of this study were to determine whether this size effect was evident in the mechanical testing of muscle fiber bundles and to examine whether the muscle fiber bundle cross-section is circular. Muscle fi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Masoud Malakoutian, Marine Theret, Shun Yamamoto, Iraj Dehghan-Hamani, Michael Lee, John Street, Fabio Rossi, Stephen H. M. Brown, Thomas R. Oxland
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/ab724b5d2a4b4020b39f2cda4348405a
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:ab724b5d2a4b4020b39f2cda4348405a
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:ab724b5d2a4b4020b39f2cda4348405a2021-12-02T15:15:44ZLarger muscle fibers and fiber bundles manifest smaller elastic modulus in paraspinal muscles of rats and humans10.1038/s41598-021-97895-z2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/ab724b5d2a4b4020b39f2cda4348405a2021-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97895-zhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The passive elastic modulus of muscle fiber appears to be size-dependent. The objectives of this study were to determine whether this size effect was evident in the mechanical testing of muscle fiber bundles and to examine whether the muscle fiber bundle cross-section is circular. Muscle fibers and fiber bundles were extracted from lumbar spine multifidus and longissimus of three cohorts: group one (G1) and two (G2) included 13 (330 ± 14 g) and 6 (452 ± 28 g) rats, while Group 3 (G3) comprised 9 degenerative spine patients. A minimum of six muscle fibers and six muscle fiber bundles from each muscle underwent cumulative stretches, each of 10% strain followed by 4 minutes relaxation. For all specimens, top and side diameters were measured. Elastic modulus was calculated as tangent at 30% strain from the stress–strain curve. Linear correlations between the sample cross sectional area (CSA) and elastic moduli in each group were performed. The correlations showed that increasing specimen CSA resulted in lower elastic modulus for both rats and humans, muscle fibers and fiber bundles. The median ratio of major to minor axis exceeded 1.0 for all groups, ranging between 1.15–1.29 for fibers and 1.27–1.44 for bundles. The lower elastic moduli with increasing size can be explained by relatively less collagenous extracellular matrix in the large fiber bundles. Future studies of passive property measurement should aim for consistent bundle sizes and measuring diameters of two orthogonal axes of the muscle specimens.Masoud MalakoutianMarine TheretShun YamamotoIraj Dehghan-HamaniMichael LeeJohn StreetFabio RossiStephen H. M. BrownThomas R. OxlandNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Masoud Malakoutian
Marine Theret
Shun Yamamoto
Iraj Dehghan-Hamani
Michael Lee
John Street
Fabio Rossi
Stephen H. M. Brown
Thomas R. Oxland
Larger muscle fibers and fiber bundles manifest smaller elastic modulus in paraspinal muscles of rats and humans
description Abstract The passive elastic modulus of muscle fiber appears to be size-dependent. The objectives of this study were to determine whether this size effect was evident in the mechanical testing of muscle fiber bundles and to examine whether the muscle fiber bundle cross-section is circular. Muscle fibers and fiber bundles were extracted from lumbar spine multifidus and longissimus of three cohorts: group one (G1) and two (G2) included 13 (330 ± 14 g) and 6 (452 ± 28 g) rats, while Group 3 (G3) comprised 9 degenerative spine patients. A minimum of six muscle fibers and six muscle fiber bundles from each muscle underwent cumulative stretches, each of 10% strain followed by 4 minutes relaxation. For all specimens, top and side diameters were measured. Elastic modulus was calculated as tangent at 30% strain from the stress–strain curve. Linear correlations between the sample cross sectional area (CSA) and elastic moduli in each group were performed. The correlations showed that increasing specimen CSA resulted in lower elastic modulus for both rats and humans, muscle fibers and fiber bundles. The median ratio of major to minor axis exceeded 1.0 for all groups, ranging between 1.15–1.29 for fibers and 1.27–1.44 for bundles. The lower elastic moduli with increasing size can be explained by relatively less collagenous extracellular matrix in the large fiber bundles. Future studies of passive property measurement should aim for consistent bundle sizes and measuring diameters of two orthogonal axes of the muscle specimens.
format article
author Masoud Malakoutian
Marine Theret
Shun Yamamoto
Iraj Dehghan-Hamani
Michael Lee
John Street
Fabio Rossi
Stephen H. M. Brown
Thomas R. Oxland
author_facet Masoud Malakoutian
Marine Theret
Shun Yamamoto
Iraj Dehghan-Hamani
Michael Lee
John Street
Fabio Rossi
Stephen H. M. Brown
Thomas R. Oxland
author_sort Masoud Malakoutian
title Larger muscle fibers and fiber bundles manifest smaller elastic modulus in paraspinal muscles of rats and humans
title_short Larger muscle fibers and fiber bundles manifest smaller elastic modulus in paraspinal muscles of rats and humans
title_full Larger muscle fibers and fiber bundles manifest smaller elastic modulus in paraspinal muscles of rats and humans
title_fullStr Larger muscle fibers and fiber bundles manifest smaller elastic modulus in paraspinal muscles of rats and humans
title_full_unstemmed Larger muscle fibers and fiber bundles manifest smaller elastic modulus in paraspinal muscles of rats and humans
title_sort larger muscle fibers and fiber bundles manifest smaller elastic modulus in paraspinal muscles of rats and humans
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/ab724b5d2a4b4020b39f2cda4348405a
work_keys_str_mv AT masoudmalakoutian largermusclefibersandfiberbundlesmanifestsmallerelasticmodulusinparaspinalmusclesofratsandhumans
AT marinetheret largermusclefibersandfiberbundlesmanifestsmallerelasticmodulusinparaspinalmusclesofratsandhumans
AT shunyamamoto largermusclefibersandfiberbundlesmanifestsmallerelasticmodulusinparaspinalmusclesofratsandhumans
AT irajdehghanhamani largermusclefibersandfiberbundlesmanifestsmallerelasticmodulusinparaspinalmusclesofratsandhumans
AT michaellee largermusclefibersandfiberbundlesmanifestsmallerelasticmodulusinparaspinalmusclesofratsandhumans
AT johnstreet largermusclefibersandfiberbundlesmanifestsmallerelasticmodulusinparaspinalmusclesofratsandhumans
AT fabiorossi largermusclefibersandfiberbundlesmanifestsmallerelasticmodulusinparaspinalmusclesofratsandhumans
AT stephenhmbrown largermusclefibersandfiberbundlesmanifestsmallerelasticmodulusinparaspinalmusclesofratsandhumans
AT thomasroxland largermusclefibersandfiberbundlesmanifestsmallerelasticmodulusinparaspinalmusclesofratsandhumans
_version_ 1718387528712585216