Self-medication practices to prevent or manage COVID-19: A systematic review

<h4>Background</h4> Previous studies have assessed the prevalence and characteristics of self-medication in COVID-19. However, no systematic review has summarized their findings. <h4>Objective</h4> We conducted a systematic review to assess the prevalence of self-medication t...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alvaro Quincho-Lopez, Christeam A. Benites-Ibarra, Maryori M. Hilario-Gomez, Renatta Quijano-Escate, Alvaro Taype-Rondan
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/ab7960acb91e4aa884a92aa4d8346d96
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:ab7960acb91e4aa884a92aa4d8346d96
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:ab7960acb91e4aa884a92aa4d8346d962021-11-11T06:44:18ZSelf-medication practices to prevent or manage COVID-19: A systematic review1932-6203https://doaj.org/article/ab7960acb91e4aa884a92aa4d8346d962021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8562851/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background</h4> Previous studies have assessed the prevalence and characteristics of self-medication in COVID-19. However, no systematic review has summarized their findings. <h4>Objective</h4> We conducted a systematic review to assess the prevalence of self-medication to prevent or manage COVID-19. <h4>Methods</h4> We used different keywords and searched studies published in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, two preprint repositories, Google, and Google Scholar. We included studies that reported original data and assessed self-medication to prevent or manage COVID-19. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) modified for cross-sectional studies. <h4>Results</h4> We identified eight studies, all studies were cross-sectional, and only one detailed the question used to assess self-medication. The recall period was heterogeneous across studies. Of the eight studies, seven assessed self-medication without focusing on a specific symptom: four performed in the general population (self-medication prevalence ranged between <4% to 88.3%) and three in specific populations (range: 33.9% to 51.3%). In these seven studies, the most used medications varied widely, including antibiotics, chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine, acetaminophen, vitamins or supplements, ivermectin, and ibuprofen. The last study only assessed self-medication for fever due to COVID-19. Most studies had a risk of bias in the “representativeness of the sample” and “assessment of outcome” items of the NOS. <h4>Conclusions</h4> Studies that assessed self-medication for COVID-19 found heterogeneous results regarding self-medication prevalence and medications used. More well-designed and adequately reported studies are warranted to assess this topic.Alvaro Quincho-LopezChristeam A. Benites-IbarraMaryori M. Hilario-GomezRenatta Quijano-EscateAlvaro Taype-RondanPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 11 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Alvaro Quincho-Lopez
Christeam A. Benites-Ibarra
Maryori M. Hilario-Gomez
Renatta Quijano-Escate
Alvaro Taype-Rondan
Self-medication practices to prevent or manage COVID-19: A systematic review
description <h4>Background</h4> Previous studies have assessed the prevalence and characteristics of self-medication in COVID-19. However, no systematic review has summarized their findings. <h4>Objective</h4> We conducted a systematic review to assess the prevalence of self-medication to prevent or manage COVID-19. <h4>Methods</h4> We used different keywords and searched studies published in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, two preprint repositories, Google, and Google Scholar. We included studies that reported original data and assessed self-medication to prevent or manage COVID-19. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) modified for cross-sectional studies. <h4>Results</h4> We identified eight studies, all studies were cross-sectional, and only one detailed the question used to assess self-medication. The recall period was heterogeneous across studies. Of the eight studies, seven assessed self-medication without focusing on a specific symptom: four performed in the general population (self-medication prevalence ranged between <4% to 88.3%) and three in specific populations (range: 33.9% to 51.3%). In these seven studies, the most used medications varied widely, including antibiotics, chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine, acetaminophen, vitamins or supplements, ivermectin, and ibuprofen. The last study only assessed self-medication for fever due to COVID-19. Most studies had a risk of bias in the “representativeness of the sample” and “assessment of outcome” items of the NOS. <h4>Conclusions</h4> Studies that assessed self-medication for COVID-19 found heterogeneous results regarding self-medication prevalence and medications used. More well-designed and adequately reported studies are warranted to assess this topic.
format article
author Alvaro Quincho-Lopez
Christeam A. Benites-Ibarra
Maryori M. Hilario-Gomez
Renatta Quijano-Escate
Alvaro Taype-Rondan
author_facet Alvaro Quincho-Lopez
Christeam A. Benites-Ibarra
Maryori M. Hilario-Gomez
Renatta Quijano-Escate
Alvaro Taype-Rondan
author_sort Alvaro Quincho-Lopez
title Self-medication practices to prevent or manage COVID-19: A systematic review
title_short Self-medication practices to prevent or manage COVID-19: A systematic review
title_full Self-medication practices to prevent or manage COVID-19: A systematic review
title_fullStr Self-medication practices to prevent or manage COVID-19: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Self-medication practices to prevent or manage COVID-19: A systematic review
title_sort self-medication practices to prevent or manage covid-19: a systematic review
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/ab7960acb91e4aa884a92aa4d8346d96
work_keys_str_mv AT alvaroquincholopez selfmedicationpracticestopreventormanagecovid19asystematicreview
AT christeamabenitesibarra selfmedicationpracticestopreventormanagecovid19asystematicreview
AT maryorimhilariogomez selfmedicationpracticestopreventormanagecovid19asystematicreview
AT renattaquijanoescate selfmedicationpracticestopreventormanagecovid19asystematicreview
AT alvarotayperondan selfmedicationpracticestopreventormanagecovid19asystematicreview
_version_ 1718439524978130944