ROS middle-layer integration into Unity3D as an interface option for propulsion drive simulations of autonomous vehicles
As autonomous vehicle development continues at growing speeds, so does the need to optimize, diagnose, and test various elements of autonomous systems under different conditions. Since such processes should be carried out in parallel, it may result in bottlenecks in development and increased complex...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
Estonian Academy Publishers
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/abc3a0f530bd4ce89c0e7922be2df785 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | As autonomous vehicle development continues at growing speeds, so does the need to optimize, diagnose, and test various elements of autonomous systems under different conditions. Since such processes should be carried out in parallel, it may result in bottlenecks in development and increased complexity. The trend for Digital Twins offers a promising option for the diagnosis and testing to be carried out separately from the physical devices, incl. autonomous vehicles in the virtual world. The idea of intercommunication between virtual and physical twins provides possibilities to estimate risks, drawbacks, physical damages to the vehicleâs drive systems, and the physical vehicleʼs critical conditions. Although providing communications between these systems arises at the speed that will be adequate to represent the physical vehicle in the virtual world correctly, it is still a trendy topic. This paper aims to demonstrate the enhancement of communications by using the Robot Operating System (ROS) as a middleware interface between two twinning systems by the example of the autonomous vehicleʼs propulsion drive. Data gathered from the physical and virtual worlds can be exchanged in the middle to allow for continuous training and optimization of the propulsion drive model, which would lead to more efficient path planning and energy-efficient drive of the autonomous vehicle itself. Additionally, a comparative analysis of ROS and its next version ROS2 is provided, discussing their differences and outlining drawbacks. |
|---|