Quality of mental health questionnaires in conflict-affected adult populations in low and middle income countries: A systematic review

Background: Accurate measurement of mental health disorders in conflict-affected populations is crucial for improving mental health care for these populations. Most studies to develop mental health questionnaires for conflict-affected populations are conducted in high income countries despite the va...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharon Christy, Chesmal Siriwardhana, Julia Lohmann, Bayard Roberts, Sarah Smith
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
War
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/abe6aa97d7ca4042a1f09536b52d4986
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:abe6aa97d7ca4042a1f09536b52d4986
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:abe6aa97d7ca4042a1f09536b52d49862021-12-02T05:04:09ZQuality of mental health questionnaires in conflict-affected adult populations in low and middle income countries: A systematic review2666-623510.1016/j.jmh.2021.100068https://doaj.org/article/abe6aa97d7ca4042a1f09536b52d49862021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666623521000350https://doaj.org/toc/2666-6235Background: Accurate measurement of mental health disorders in conflict-affected populations is crucial for improving mental health care for these populations. Most studies to develop mental health questionnaires for conflict-affected populations are conducted in high income countries despite the vast majority of conflict-affected populations residing in Low and Middle Income Countries (LAMICs). The aim of this systematic review is to assess the quality of questionnaires for mental disorders that have been either developed or validated in conflict- affected settings in LAMICs. Methods: A systematic review of 5 databases (CINAHL Plus, EMBASE, Global Health, MEDLINE and PsycINFO) was conducted to identify validation studies for questionnaires measuring mental health disorders in adult conflict-affected population in LAMICs. Well-established psychometric criteria evaluating reliability, validity and responsiveness of questionnaires were applied for quality appraisal. Results: Thirty validation studies were included in this review, which reported on data for 33 questionnaires. Twenty-four were questionnaires that had been originally developed in different settings and adapted for use with a new conflict-affected population and 9 had been newly developed for the conflict-affected population being studied. Overall, there was high variability in the quality of evidence for the questionnaires with moderate evidence for the validity and reliability of included questionnaires but no responsiveness data reported. Conclusion: There has been increasing recognition of the particular importance of psychometrics in this field to facilitate the development of good quality mental health questionnaires suitable for use in LAMICs. However, this review highlighted the current limited quantity and quality of such questionnaires.Sharon ChristyChesmal SiriwardhanaJulia LohmannBayard RobertsSarah SmithElsevierarticleGlobal mental healthPsychometricsValidation studyDiagnosisMental health screeningWarPublic aspects of medicineRA1-1270Colonies and colonization. Emigration and immigration. International migrationJV1-9480ENJournal of Migration and Health, Vol 4, Iss , Pp 100068- (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Global mental health
Psychometrics
Validation study
Diagnosis
Mental health screening
War
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
Colonies and colonization. Emigration and immigration. International migration
JV1-9480
spellingShingle Global mental health
Psychometrics
Validation study
Diagnosis
Mental health screening
War
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
Colonies and colonization. Emigration and immigration. International migration
JV1-9480
Sharon Christy
Chesmal Siriwardhana
Julia Lohmann
Bayard Roberts
Sarah Smith
Quality of mental health questionnaires in conflict-affected adult populations in low and middle income countries: A systematic review
description Background: Accurate measurement of mental health disorders in conflict-affected populations is crucial for improving mental health care for these populations. Most studies to develop mental health questionnaires for conflict-affected populations are conducted in high income countries despite the vast majority of conflict-affected populations residing in Low and Middle Income Countries (LAMICs). The aim of this systematic review is to assess the quality of questionnaires for mental disorders that have been either developed or validated in conflict- affected settings in LAMICs. Methods: A systematic review of 5 databases (CINAHL Plus, EMBASE, Global Health, MEDLINE and PsycINFO) was conducted to identify validation studies for questionnaires measuring mental health disorders in adult conflict-affected population in LAMICs. Well-established psychometric criteria evaluating reliability, validity and responsiveness of questionnaires were applied for quality appraisal. Results: Thirty validation studies were included in this review, which reported on data for 33 questionnaires. Twenty-four were questionnaires that had been originally developed in different settings and adapted for use with a new conflict-affected population and 9 had been newly developed for the conflict-affected population being studied. Overall, there was high variability in the quality of evidence for the questionnaires with moderate evidence for the validity and reliability of included questionnaires but no responsiveness data reported. Conclusion: There has been increasing recognition of the particular importance of psychometrics in this field to facilitate the development of good quality mental health questionnaires suitable for use in LAMICs. However, this review highlighted the current limited quantity and quality of such questionnaires.
format article
author Sharon Christy
Chesmal Siriwardhana
Julia Lohmann
Bayard Roberts
Sarah Smith
author_facet Sharon Christy
Chesmal Siriwardhana
Julia Lohmann
Bayard Roberts
Sarah Smith
author_sort Sharon Christy
title Quality of mental health questionnaires in conflict-affected adult populations in low and middle income countries: A systematic review
title_short Quality of mental health questionnaires in conflict-affected adult populations in low and middle income countries: A systematic review
title_full Quality of mental health questionnaires in conflict-affected adult populations in low and middle income countries: A systematic review
title_fullStr Quality of mental health questionnaires in conflict-affected adult populations in low and middle income countries: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Quality of mental health questionnaires in conflict-affected adult populations in low and middle income countries: A systematic review
title_sort quality of mental health questionnaires in conflict-affected adult populations in low and middle income countries: a systematic review
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/abe6aa97d7ca4042a1f09536b52d4986
work_keys_str_mv AT sharonchristy qualityofmentalhealthquestionnairesinconflictaffectedadultpopulationsinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT chesmalsiriwardhana qualityofmentalhealthquestionnairesinconflictaffectedadultpopulationsinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT julialohmann qualityofmentalhealthquestionnairesinconflictaffectedadultpopulationsinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT bayardroberts qualityofmentalhealthquestionnairesinconflictaffectedadultpopulationsinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT sarahsmith qualityofmentalhealthquestionnairesinconflictaffectedadultpopulationsinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview
_version_ 1718400668806414336