Adapting the patient and physician versions of the 9-item shared decision making questionnaire for other healthcare providers in Japan

Abstract Background In Japan, the number of older people with various health problems and difficulties in living is increasing. In order to practice patient-centered care for them, not only medical professionals but also multidisciplinary teams including care professionals and patients need to pract...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Yuko Goto, Yasuhiro Yamaguchi, Joji Onishi, Hidenori Arai, Martin Härter, Isabelle Scholl, Levente Kriston, Hisayuki Miura
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	BMC 2021
Materias:	Patient-centered care Shared decision-making Healthcare provider Interprofessional education Reliability Validity Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics R858-859.7
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/abf962115d214f53a51535264a3075bc
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:abf962115d214f53a51535264a3075bc
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:abf962115d214f53a51535264a3075bc2021-11-14T12:29:20ZAdapting the patient and physician versions of the 9-item shared decision making questionnaire for other healthcare providers in Japan10.1186/s12911-021-01683-81472-6947https://doaj.org/article/abf962115d214f53a51535264a3075bc2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01683-8https://doaj.org/toc/1472-6947Abstract Background In Japan, the number of older people with various health problems and difficulties in living is increasing. In order to practice patient-centered care for them, not only medical professionals but also multidisciplinary teams including care professionals and patients need to practice shared decision making (SDM) in the context of long-term care. For this reason, a measure of SDM in consultations with healthcare professionals (HCPs) other than physicians is needed. Therefore, this study aimed at adapting the patient and physician versions of the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9, SDM-Q-Doc) for consultations with HCPs other than physicians in Japan. Methods A pair of SDM measures that can be used by HCPs other than physicians, “Care SDM-Questionnaire for care receivers (SDM-C-patient)” and “Care SDM-Questionnaire for care providers (SDM-C-provider)” were prepared based on the Japanese versions of the SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc. The internal consistency and conceptual structure of these measures were tested by secondary analysis of data from 496 participants from a workshop on SDM for different HCPs. Measurement invariance were tested by multigroup confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) for the patient (SDM-C-patient and SDM-Q-9) and provider (SDM-C-provider vs. SDM-Q-Doc) versions. Results Both the Japanese SDM-C-patient and SDM-C-provider demonstrated high internal consistencies (Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.90 and McDonald’s ω coefficient was 0.90 for both measures). CFA showed one-factor structures for both measures and original measures for physicians. Moreover, multigroup CFA showed configural and metric invariance between the novel care measures and original physician’s measures. Conclusions Thus, the novel SDM measures for care providers in Japan as well as the original physician’s measures could be used in training setting. As these measures were tested only in a training setting, their reliability and validity as new measures for care should be tested in a clinical setting in future.Yuko GotoYasuhiro YamaguchiJoji OnishiHidenori AraiMartin HärterIsabelle SchollLevente KristonHisayuki MiuraBMCarticlePatient-centered careShared decision-makingHealthcare providerInterprofessional educationReliabilityValidityComputer applications to medicine. Medical informaticsR858-859.7ENBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Patient-centered care Shared decision-making Healthcare provider Interprofessional education Reliability Validity Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics R858-859.7
spellingShingle	Patient-centered care Shared decision-making Healthcare provider Interprofessional education Reliability Validity Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics R858-859.7 Yuko Goto Yasuhiro Yamaguchi Joji Onishi Hidenori Arai Martin Härter Isabelle Scholl Levente Kriston Hisayuki Miura Adapting the patient and physician versions of the 9-item shared decision making questionnaire for other healthcare providers in Japan
description	Abstract Background In Japan, the number of older people with various health problems and difficulties in living is increasing. In order to practice patient-centered care for them, not only medical professionals but also multidisciplinary teams including care professionals and patients need to practice shared decision making (SDM) in the context of long-term care. For this reason, a measure of SDM in consultations with healthcare professionals (HCPs) other than physicians is needed. Therefore, this study aimed at adapting the patient and physician versions of the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9, SDM-Q-Doc) for consultations with HCPs other than physicians in Japan. Methods A pair of SDM measures that can be used by HCPs other than physicians, “Care SDM-Questionnaire for care receivers (SDM-C-patient)” and “Care SDM-Questionnaire for care providers (SDM-C-provider)” were prepared based on the Japanese versions of the SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc. The internal consistency and conceptual structure of these measures were tested by secondary analysis of data from 496 participants from a workshop on SDM for different HCPs. Measurement invariance were tested by multigroup confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) for the patient (SDM-C-patient and SDM-Q-9) and provider (SDM-C-provider vs. SDM-Q-Doc) versions. Results Both the Japanese SDM-C-patient and SDM-C-provider demonstrated high internal consistencies (Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.90 and McDonald’s ω coefficient was 0.90 for both measures). CFA showed one-factor structures for both measures and original measures for physicians. Moreover, multigroup CFA showed configural and metric invariance between the novel care measures and original physician’s measures. Conclusions Thus, the novel SDM measures for care providers in Japan as well as the original physician’s measures could be used in training setting. As these measures were tested only in a training setting, their reliability and validity as new measures for care should be tested in a clinical setting in future.
format	article
author	Yuko Goto Yasuhiro Yamaguchi Joji Onishi Hidenori Arai Martin Härter Isabelle Scholl Levente Kriston Hisayuki Miura
author_facet	Yuko Goto Yasuhiro Yamaguchi Joji Onishi Hidenori Arai Martin Härter Isabelle Scholl Levente Kriston Hisayuki Miura
author_sort	Yuko Goto
title	Adapting the patient and physician versions of the 9-item shared decision making questionnaire for other healthcare providers in Japan
title_short	Adapting the patient and physician versions of the 9-item shared decision making questionnaire for other healthcare providers in Japan
title_full	Adapting the patient and physician versions of the 9-item shared decision making questionnaire for other healthcare providers in Japan
title_fullStr	Adapting the patient and physician versions of the 9-item shared decision making questionnaire for other healthcare providers in Japan
title_full_unstemmed	Adapting the patient and physician versions of the 9-item shared decision making questionnaire for other healthcare providers in Japan
title_sort	adapting the patient and physician versions of the 9-item shared decision making questionnaire for other healthcare providers in japan
publisher	BMC
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/abf962115d214f53a51535264a3075bc
work_keys_str_mv	AT yukogoto adaptingthepatientandphysicianversionsofthe9itemshareddecisionmakingquestionnaireforotherhealthcareprovidersinjapan AT yasuhiroyamaguchi adaptingthepatientandphysicianversionsofthe9itemshareddecisionmakingquestionnaireforotherhealthcareprovidersinjapan AT jojionishi adaptingthepatientandphysicianversionsofthe9itemshareddecisionmakingquestionnaireforotherhealthcareprovidersinjapan AT hidenoriarai adaptingthepatientandphysicianversionsofthe9itemshareddecisionmakingquestionnaireforotherhealthcareprovidersinjapan AT martinharter adaptingthepatientandphysicianversionsofthe9itemshareddecisionmakingquestionnaireforotherhealthcareprovidersinjapan AT isabellescholl adaptingthepatientandphysicianversionsofthe9itemshareddecisionmakingquestionnaireforotherhealthcareprovidersinjapan AT leventekriston adaptingthepatientandphysicianversionsofthe9itemshareddecisionmakingquestionnaireforotherhealthcareprovidersinjapan AT hisayukimiura adaptingthepatientandphysicianversionsofthe9itemshareddecisionmakingquestionnaireforotherhealthcareprovidersinjapan
_version_	1718429186213806080

Adapting the patient and physician versions of the 9-item shared decision making questionnaire for other healthcare providers in Japan

Ejemplares similares