Model Evaluation and Intercomparison of Marine Warm Low Cloud Fractions With Neural Network Ensembles

Abstract Low cloud fractions (LCFs) and meteorological factors (MFs) over an oceanic region containing multiple cloud regimes are examined for three data sets: one Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM) simulation with the default 72‐layer vertical grid (E3SM72), another one with 8‐times vertical...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yao‐Sheng Chen, Takanobu Yamaguchi, Peter A. Bogenschutz, Graham Feingold
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: American Geophysical Union (AGU) 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/abfe21993682470981f5f851cc7c2ed6
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:abfe21993682470981f5f851cc7c2ed6
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:abfe21993682470981f5f851cc7c2ed62021-11-30T08:40:32ZModel Evaluation and Intercomparison of Marine Warm Low Cloud Fractions With Neural Network Ensembles1942-246610.1029/2021MS002625https://doaj.org/article/abfe21993682470981f5f851cc7c2ed62021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002625https://doaj.org/toc/1942-2466Abstract Low cloud fractions (LCFs) and meteorological factors (MFs) over an oceanic region containing multiple cloud regimes are examined for three data sets: one Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM) simulation with the default 72‐layer vertical grid (E3SM72), another one with 8‐times vertical resolution via the Framework for Improvement by Vertical Enhancement (E3SM×8), and one with MFs from ERA5 reanalysis and LCFs from the CERES SSF product (ERA5‐SSF). Neural networks (NNs) are trained to capture the relationship between MFs and LCF and to select the best‐performing MF subsets for predicting LCF. NN ensembles are used to (a) confirm the performance of selected MF subsets, (b) to serve as proxy models for each data set to predict LCFs for MFs from all data sets, and (c) to classify MFs into those in shared and uniquely occupied MF subspaces. Overall, E3SM72 and E3SM×8 have large fractions of MFs in shared MF subspace, but less so near the Californian and Peruvian stratocumulus decks. E3SM×8 and ERA5 have small fractions of MFs in shared MF subspace but greater than E3SM72 and ERA5, especially in the Southeast Pacific. The differences in LCFs between three pairs of data sets are decomposed into those associated with the differences in the LCF‐MF relationship and those involving different MFs. Given the same MFs, LCFs produced by E3SM×8 are greater than those produced by E3SM72 but are still different from those in ERA5‐SSF. In general, the shift in MFs dominates the difference in the LCFs.Yao‐Sheng ChenTakanobu YamaguchiPeter A. BogenschutzGraham FeingoldAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)articlecloud controlling factorsE3SMhigh resolution modelingmachine learningshallow cloudsPhysical geographyGB3-5030OceanographyGC1-1581ENJournal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol 13, Iss 11, Pp n/a-n/a (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic cloud controlling factors
E3SM
high resolution modeling
machine learning
shallow clouds
Physical geography
GB3-5030
Oceanography
GC1-1581
spellingShingle cloud controlling factors
E3SM
high resolution modeling
machine learning
shallow clouds
Physical geography
GB3-5030
Oceanography
GC1-1581
Yao‐Sheng Chen
Takanobu Yamaguchi
Peter A. Bogenschutz
Graham Feingold
Model Evaluation and Intercomparison of Marine Warm Low Cloud Fractions With Neural Network Ensembles
description Abstract Low cloud fractions (LCFs) and meteorological factors (MFs) over an oceanic region containing multiple cloud regimes are examined for three data sets: one Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM) simulation with the default 72‐layer vertical grid (E3SM72), another one with 8‐times vertical resolution via the Framework for Improvement by Vertical Enhancement (E3SM×8), and one with MFs from ERA5 reanalysis and LCFs from the CERES SSF product (ERA5‐SSF). Neural networks (NNs) are trained to capture the relationship between MFs and LCF and to select the best‐performing MF subsets for predicting LCF. NN ensembles are used to (a) confirm the performance of selected MF subsets, (b) to serve as proxy models for each data set to predict LCFs for MFs from all data sets, and (c) to classify MFs into those in shared and uniquely occupied MF subspaces. Overall, E3SM72 and E3SM×8 have large fractions of MFs in shared MF subspace, but less so near the Californian and Peruvian stratocumulus decks. E3SM×8 and ERA5 have small fractions of MFs in shared MF subspace but greater than E3SM72 and ERA5, especially in the Southeast Pacific. The differences in LCFs between three pairs of data sets are decomposed into those associated with the differences in the LCF‐MF relationship and those involving different MFs. Given the same MFs, LCFs produced by E3SM×8 are greater than those produced by E3SM72 but are still different from those in ERA5‐SSF. In general, the shift in MFs dominates the difference in the LCFs.
format article
author Yao‐Sheng Chen
Takanobu Yamaguchi
Peter A. Bogenschutz
Graham Feingold
author_facet Yao‐Sheng Chen
Takanobu Yamaguchi
Peter A. Bogenschutz
Graham Feingold
author_sort Yao‐Sheng Chen
title Model Evaluation and Intercomparison of Marine Warm Low Cloud Fractions With Neural Network Ensembles
title_short Model Evaluation and Intercomparison of Marine Warm Low Cloud Fractions With Neural Network Ensembles
title_full Model Evaluation and Intercomparison of Marine Warm Low Cloud Fractions With Neural Network Ensembles
title_fullStr Model Evaluation and Intercomparison of Marine Warm Low Cloud Fractions With Neural Network Ensembles
title_full_unstemmed Model Evaluation and Intercomparison of Marine Warm Low Cloud Fractions With Neural Network Ensembles
title_sort model evaluation and intercomparison of marine warm low cloud fractions with neural network ensembles
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/abfe21993682470981f5f851cc7c2ed6
work_keys_str_mv AT yaoshengchen modelevaluationandintercomparisonofmarinewarmlowcloudfractionswithneuralnetworkensembles
AT takanobuyamaguchi modelevaluationandintercomparisonofmarinewarmlowcloudfractionswithneuralnetworkensembles
AT peterabogenschutz modelevaluationandintercomparisonofmarinewarmlowcloudfractionswithneuralnetworkensembles
AT grahamfeingold modelevaluationandintercomparisonofmarinewarmlowcloudfractionswithneuralnetworkensembles
_version_ 1718406703490269184