Comparative Efficacy of Levetiracetam for Epilepsy in School-Aged Children with Intellectual Disability and Normal Intelligence

Choosing optimal anti-seizure medication (ASM) is very important in pediatric patients with epilepsy who attend school, especially children with an intellectual disability (ID). Levetiracetam (LEV) has proven to be an effective, safe, generally well-tolerated, broad-spectrum ASM in children. In the...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ja Un Moon, Ji Yoon Han
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/ac13ae2b7de64dbb9dca02988a2316ca
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:ac13ae2b7de64dbb9dca02988a2316ca
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:ac13ae2b7de64dbb9dca02988a2316ca2021-11-25T16:57:40ZComparative Efficacy of Levetiracetam for Epilepsy in School-Aged Children with Intellectual Disability and Normal Intelligence10.3390/brainsci111114522076-3425https://doaj.org/article/ac13ae2b7de64dbb9dca02988a2316ca2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/11/11/1452https://doaj.org/toc/2076-3425Choosing optimal anti-seizure medication (ASM) is very important in pediatric patients with epilepsy who attend school, especially children with an intellectual disability (ID). Levetiracetam (LEV) has proven to be an effective, safe, generally well-tolerated, broad-spectrum ASM in children. In the context of increasing use of LEV in school-aged children with epilepsy and ID, we evaluate relevant clinical data, including efficacy, safety, and tolerability in children with epilepsy and an intellectual disability (ID) or normal intelligence (NI). We performed a retrospective chart review of children and included 298 pediatric patients with epilepsy who were treated with LEV with NI (147) and ID (151). After 6 months, 96% of NI and 83% of ID subjects had a seizure reduction rate greater than 50% (<i>p =</i> 0.031). The tolerability of LEV was generally good, with 75% retention rates at 2 years in both groups and only minor side effects (under 15%). The retention rates of patients with NI and ID were 76% and 74%, respectively (<i>p =</i> 0.597). Thus, LEV showed considerable efficacy with minimal side effects and high retention rates and is an easily maintained and safe treatment option for pediatric epilepsy with ID. However, better-designed research studies are needed to clearly elucidate the efficacy and safety of LEV in children with epilepsy and ID.Ja Un MoonJi Yoon HanMDPI AGarticlelevetiracetamanti-seizure medicationsintellectual disabilityepilepsychildrenefficacyNeurosciences. Biological psychiatry. NeuropsychiatryRC321-571ENBrain Sciences, Vol 11, Iss 1452, p 1452 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic levetiracetam
anti-seizure medications
intellectual disability
epilepsy
children
efficacy
Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
RC321-571
spellingShingle levetiracetam
anti-seizure medications
intellectual disability
epilepsy
children
efficacy
Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
RC321-571
Ja Un Moon
Ji Yoon Han
Comparative Efficacy of Levetiracetam for Epilepsy in School-Aged Children with Intellectual Disability and Normal Intelligence
description Choosing optimal anti-seizure medication (ASM) is very important in pediatric patients with epilepsy who attend school, especially children with an intellectual disability (ID). Levetiracetam (LEV) has proven to be an effective, safe, generally well-tolerated, broad-spectrum ASM in children. In the context of increasing use of LEV in school-aged children with epilepsy and ID, we evaluate relevant clinical data, including efficacy, safety, and tolerability in children with epilepsy and an intellectual disability (ID) or normal intelligence (NI). We performed a retrospective chart review of children and included 298 pediatric patients with epilepsy who were treated with LEV with NI (147) and ID (151). After 6 months, 96% of NI and 83% of ID subjects had a seizure reduction rate greater than 50% (<i>p =</i> 0.031). The tolerability of LEV was generally good, with 75% retention rates at 2 years in both groups and only minor side effects (under 15%). The retention rates of patients with NI and ID were 76% and 74%, respectively (<i>p =</i> 0.597). Thus, LEV showed considerable efficacy with minimal side effects and high retention rates and is an easily maintained and safe treatment option for pediatric epilepsy with ID. However, better-designed research studies are needed to clearly elucidate the efficacy and safety of LEV in children with epilepsy and ID.
format article
author Ja Un Moon
Ji Yoon Han
author_facet Ja Un Moon
Ji Yoon Han
author_sort Ja Un Moon
title Comparative Efficacy of Levetiracetam for Epilepsy in School-Aged Children with Intellectual Disability and Normal Intelligence
title_short Comparative Efficacy of Levetiracetam for Epilepsy in School-Aged Children with Intellectual Disability and Normal Intelligence
title_full Comparative Efficacy of Levetiracetam for Epilepsy in School-Aged Children with Intellectual Disability and Normal Intelligence
title_fullStr Comparative Efficacy of Levetiracetam for Epilepsy in School-Aged Children with Intellectual Disability and Normal Intelligence
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Efficacy of Levetiracetam for Epilepsy in School-Aged Children with Intellectual Disability and Normal Intelligence
title_sort comparative efficacy of levetiracetam for epilepsy in school-aged children with intellectual disability and normal intelligence
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/ac13ae2b7de64dbb9dca02988a2316ca
work_keys_str_mv AT jaunmoon comparativeefficacyoflevetiracetamforepilepsyinschoolagedchildrenwithintellectualdisabilityandnormalintelligence
AT jiyoonhan comparativeefficacyoflevetiracetamforepilepsyinschoolagedchildrenwithintellectualdisabilityandnormalintelligence
_version_ 1718412856157798400