Introduction as a Genre of Auto-Commentary in Works of I. S. Turgenev

The phenomenon of the author’s reflection on his works is considered on the basis of the introductions by I. S. Turgenev. The absence of special works on this topic allows us to speak about the novelty of the study. Its relevance is associated with raising the question of the specifics and role of t...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	N. V. Volodina
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	RU
Publicado:	Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov 2021
Materias:	i. s. turgenev authentic introduction delayed introduction auto comment intention addressee of the preface Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/ac1ef1f382f14218acb972ec02fdf756
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:ac1ef1f382f14218acb972ec02fdf756
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:ac1ef1f382f14218acb972ec02fdf7562021-12-02T07:58:13ZIntroduction as a Genre of Auto-Commentary in Works of I. S. Turgenev2225-756X2227-129510.24224/2227-1295-2021-2-163-174https://doaj.org/article/ac1ef1f382f14218acb972ec02fdf7562021-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/2431https://doaj.org/toc/2225-756Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2227-1295The phenomenon of the author’s reflection on his works is considered on the basis of the introductions by I. S. Turgenev. The absence of special works on this topic allows us to speak about the novelty of the study. Its relevance is associated with raising the question of the specifics and role of the author’s understanding of the meaning of his own works and its correlation with the perception of the reader. The results of a comparative analysis of all of Turgenev’s introductions are presented in the article. The attitude of Turgenev to the opinion of the reader and criticism is shown. It is proved that Turgenev’s introductions “do not justify” their theoretical expectations, because the writer deliberately refuses to comment on the intentionality and meaning of his works in them. It is concluded that this allows the writer to express a theoretically important idea about the “non-interference” of the writer in the text he created. Particular attention is paid to the “Introduction to the Novels”, which is a kind of metatext uniting all six works of this genre, which allows Turgenev to determine the main direction and principles of his work. It is shown that these issues are considered by the writer in the context of general aesthetic problems: the specifics of artistic cognition, freedom of creativity, the conscious and unconscious in art, the relationship between the artist and the critic / reader, etc.N. V. VolodinaTsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektovarticlei. s. turgenevauthentic introductiondelayed introductionauto commentintentionaddressee of the prefaceSlavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languagesPG1-9665RUНаучный диалог, Vol 0, Iss 2, Pp 163-174 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	RU
topic	i. s. turgenev authentic introduction delayed introduction auto comment intention addressee of the preface Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665
spellingShingle	i. s. turgenev authentic introduction delayed introduction auto comment intention addressee of the preface Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665 N. V. Volodina Introduction as a Genre of Auto-Commentary in Works of I. S. Turgenev
description	The phenomenon of the author’s reflection on his works is considered on the basis of the introductions by I. S. Turgenev. The absence of special works on this topic allows us to speak about the novelty of the study. Its relevance is associated with raising the question of the specifics and role of the author’s understanding of the meaning of his own works and its correlation with the perception of the reader. The results of a comparative analysis of all of Turgenev’s introductions are presented in the article. The attitude of Turgenev to the opinion of the reader and criticism is shown. It is proved that Turgenev’s introductions “do not justify” their theoretical expectations, because the writer deliberately refuses to comment on the intentionality and meaning of his works in them. It is concluded that this allows the writer to express a theoretically important idea about the “non-interference” of the writer in the text he created. Particular attention is paid to the “Introduction to the Novels”, which is a kind of metatext uniting all six works of this genre, which allows Turgenev to determine the main direction and principles of his work. It is shown that these issues are considered by the writer in the context of general aesthetic problems: the specifics of artistic cognition, freedom of creativity, the conscious and unconscious in art, the relationship between the artist and the critic / reader, etc.
format	article
author	N. V. Volodina
author_facet	N. V. Volodina
author_sort	N. V. Volodina
title	Introduction as a Genre of Auto-Commentary in Works of I. S. Turgenev
title_short	Introduction as a Genre of Auto-Commentary in Works of I. S. Turgenev
title_full	Introduction as a Genre of Auto-Commentary in Works of I. S. Turgenev
title_fullStr	Introduction as a Genre of Auto-Commentary in Works of I. S. Turgenev
title_full_unstemmed	Introduction as a Genre of Auto-Commentary in Works of I. S. Turgenev
title_sort	introduction as a genre of auto-commentary in works of i. s. turgenev
publisher	Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/ac1ef1f382f14218acb972ec02fdf756
work_keys_str_mv	AT nvvolodina introductionasagenreofautocommentaryinworksofisturgenev
_version_	1718398808709136384

Introduction as a Genre of Auto-Commentary in Works of I. S. Turgenev

Ejemplares similares