INVESTIGATION OF PRESERVICE MATHEMATICS TEACHERS’ PROOF SCHEMES ACCORDING TO DNR BASED INSTRUCTION

The aim of this study is to determine the types of the proof schemes used in the proof process by freshman and senior elementary pre-service mathematics teachers who are students at public university in 2011-2012 academic year and also to examine whether there is any difference between proof schemes...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sare ŞENGÜL, Pınar GÜNER
Formato: article
Lenguaje:DE
EN
FR
TR
Publicado: Fırat University 2019
Materias:
H
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/ac52fcf1feb9488987080339779e98ad
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:ac52fcf1feb9488987080339779e98ad
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:ac52fcf1feb9488987080339779e98ad2021-11-24T09:21:05ZINVESTIGATION OF PRESERVICE MATHEMATICS TEACHERS’ PROOF SCHEMES ACCORDING TO DNR BASED INSTRUCTION2148-416310.9761/jasss_401https://doaj.org/article/ac52fcf1feb9488987080339779e98ad2019-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://jasstudies.com/index.jsp?mod=tammetin&makaleadi=848843812_47%C5%9Feng%C3%BClsare-JASSS%20%281%29-869-878.pdf&key=26369https://doaj.org/toc/2148-4163The aim of this study is to determine the types of the proof schemes used in the proof process by freshman and senior elementary pre-service mathematics teachers who are students at public university in 2011-2012 academic year and also to examine whether there is any difference between proof schemes used by freshman and senior elementary pre-service mathematics teachers. The sample of the study consists of 135 elementary pre-service mathematics teachers. Because the actual state is investigated descriptive method is used. 5 problems are asked and answers are classified according to proof schemes. Classification designed by Harel and Sowder (1998) is used. In the analysis process, answers of elementary pre-service mathematics teachers are evaluated according to proof schemes’ properties and classified into 4 categories; external, empirical, analytical, and empty. Percentage frequency tables of proof schemes prepared and bar chart is drawn. Also, it is analyzed that whether there is a significant difference between proof schemes according to class levels or not by using t test with a statistical programme. Results indicated that all proof scheme types (external, analytical, empirical) are used by the students. Also, empirical schemes are mostly used by freshman elementary pre-service mathematics teachers and analytical schemes are mostly used by senior elementary pre-service mathematics teachers. Suggestions made according to results of the study.Sare ŞENGÜLPınar GÜNERFırat Universityarticleproof, proof schemes, preservice mathematics teachersSocial SciencesHSocial sciences (General)H1-99DEENFRTRJournal of Academic Social Science Studies , Vol 6, Iss 17, Pp 869-878 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language DE
EN
FR
TR
topic proof, proof schemes, pre
service mathematics teachers
Social Sciences
H
Social sciences (General)
H1-99
spellingShingle proof, proof schemes, pre
service mathematics teachers
Social Sciences
H
Social sciences (General)
H1-99
Sare ŞENGÜL
Pınar GÜNER
INVESTIGATION OF PRESERVICE MATHEMATICS TEACHERS’ PROOF SCHEMES ACCORDING TO DNR BASED INSTRUCTION
description The aim of this study is to determine the types of the proof schemes used in the proof process by freshman and senior elementary pre-service mathematics teachers who are students at public university in 2011-2012 academic year and also to examine whether there is any difference between proof schemes used by freshman and senior elementary pre-service mathematics teachers. The sample of the study consists of 135 elementary pre-service mathematics teachers. Because the actual state is investigated descriptive method is used. 5 problems are asked and answers are classified according to proof schemes. Classification designed by Harel and Sowder (1998) is used. In the analysis process, answers of elementary pre-service mathematics teachers are evaluated according to proof schemes’ properties and classified into 4 categories; external, empirical, analytical, and empty. Percentage frequency tables of proof schemes prepared and bar chart is drawn. Also, it is analyzed that whether there is a significant difference between proof schemes according to class levels or not by using t test with a statistical programme. Results indicated that all proof scheme types (external, analytical, empirical) are used by the students. Also, empirical schemes are mostly used by freshman elementary pre-service mathematics teachers and analytical schemes are mostly used by senior elementary pre-service mathematics teachers. Suggestions made according to results of the study.
format article
author Sare ŞENGÜL
Pınar GÜNER
author_facet Sare ŞENGÜL
Pınar GÜNER
author_sort Sare ŞENGÜL
title INVESTIGATION OF PRESERVICE MATHEMATICS TEACHERS’ PROOF SCHEMES ACCORDING TO DNR BASED INSTRUCTION
title_short INVESTIGATION OF PRESERVICE MATHEMATICS TEACHERS’ PROOF SCHEMES ACCORDING TO DNR BASED INSTRUCTION
title_full INVESTIGATION OF PRESERVICE MATHEMATICS TEACHERS’ PROOF SCHEMES ACCORDING TO DNR BASED INSTRUCTION
title_fullStr INVESTIGATION OF PRESERVICE MATHEMATICS TEACHERS’ PROOF SCHEMES ACCORDING TO DNR BASED INSTRUCTION
title_full_unstemmed INVESTIGATION OF PRESERVICE MATHEMATICS TEACHERS’ PROOF SCHEMES ACCORDING TO DNR BASED INSTRUCTION
title_sort investigation of preservice mathematics teachers’ proof schemes according to dnr based instruction
publisher Fırat University
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/ac52fcf1feb9488987080339779e98ad
work_keys_str_mv AT saresengul investigationofpreservicemathematicsteachersproofschemesaccordingtodnrbasedinstruction
AT pınarguner investigationofpreservicemathematicsteachersproofschemesaccordingtodnrbasedinstruction
_version_ 1718415246368964608