REFERENCE ERROR IN BOOK MANUSCRIPT FROM LIPI: HOW GOOD OUR SCIENTISTS ARE IN COMPOSING REFERENCES

Reference lists from 13 book manuscripts that were submitted to LIPI Press in 2018 written by the writers from LIPI were examined. In total, there were 879 reference list entries, and the accuracy of each citation was examined. The examination was conducted by firstly determining the type of error a...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Martinus Helmiawan
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN ID
Publicado:	Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia 2020
Materias:	reference errors reference style books researchers reference management software Bibliography. Library science. Information resources Z
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/ac568899542143248d8c6db1958b6e7a
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:ac568899542143248d8c6db1958b6e7a
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:ac568899542143248d8c6db1958b6e7a2021-12-02T15:31:23ZREFERENCE ERROR IN BOOK MANUSCRIPT FROM LIPI: HOW GOOD OUR SCIENTISTS ARE IN COMPOSING REFERENCES0125-90082301-859310.14203/j.baca.v41i1.559https://doaj.org/article/ac568899542143248d8c6db1958b6e7a2020-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://jurnalbaca.pdii.lipi.go.id/index.php/baca/article/view/559https://doaj.org/toc/0125-9008https://doaj.org/toc/2301-8593Reference lists from 13 book manuscripts that were submitted to LIPI Press in 2018 written by the writers from LIPI were examined. In total, there were 879 reference list entries, and the accuracy of each citation was examined. The examination was conducted by firstly determining the type of error and reference style used for cross-checking. Afterwards, each entry was thoroughly checked for errors. Found errors were grouped into each type of error. The result, only 100 entries were error-free, and from the 779 entries that contain errors, 3,651 errors were found. The errors were categorized into 1,576 punctuation errors; 396 capitalization errors; 338 italicization errors, 206 spelling and word choice errors; 126 syntax errors; 642 spacing errors; 46 extraneous information errors; and 321 missing data errors. From that result, error rate of 4.15 was achieved. This paper concluded that the overall huge error rate found shows the negligence of the writers in composing references.Martinus HelmiawanLembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesiaarticlereference errorsreference stylebooksresearchersreference management softwareBibliography. Library science. Information resourcesZENIDBaca: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi, Vol 41, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2020)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN ID
topic	reference errors reference style books researchers reference management software Bibliography. Library science. Information resources Z
spellingShingle	reference errors reference style books researchers reference management software Bibliography. Library science. Information resources Z Martinus Helmiawan REFERENCE ERROR IN BOOK MANUSCRIPT FROM LIPI: HOW GOOD OUR SCIENTISTS ARE IN COMPOSING REFERENCES
description	Reference lists from 13 book manuscripts that were submitted to LIPI Press in 2018 written by the writers from LIPI were examined. In total, there were 879 reference list entries, and the accuracy of each citation was examined. The examination was conducted by firstly determining the type of error and reference style used for cross-checking. Afterwards, each entry was thoroughly checked for errors. Found errors were grouped into each type of error. The result, only 100 entries were error-free, and from the 779 entries that contain errors, 3,651 errors were found. The errors were categorized into 1,576 punctuation errors; 396 capitalization errors; 338 italicization errors, 206 spelling and word choice errors; 126 syntax errors; 642 spacing errors; 46 extraneous information errors; and 321 missing data errors. From that result, error rate of 4.15 was achieved. This paper concluded that the overall huge error rate found shows the negligence of the writers in composing references.
format	article
author	Martinus Helmiawan
author_facet	Martinus Helmiawan
author_sort	Martinus Helmiawan
title	REFERENCE ERROR IN BOOK MANUSCRIPT FROM LIPI: HOW GOOD OUR SCIENTISTS ARE IN COMPOSING REFERENCES
title_short	REFERENCE ERROR IN BOOK MANUSCRIPT FROM LIPI: HOW GOOD OUR SCIENTISTS ARE IN COMPOSING REFERENCES
title_full	REFERENCE ERROR IN BOOK MANUSCRIPT FROM LIPI: HOW GOOD OUR SCIENTISTS ARE IN COMPOSING REFERENCES
title_fullStr	REFERENCE ERROR IN BOOK MANUSCRIPT FROM LIPI: HOW GOOD OUR SCIENTISTS ARE IN COMPOSING REFERENCES
title_full_unstemmed	REFERENCE ERROR IN BOOK MANUSCRIPT FROM LIPI: HOW GOOD OUR SCIENTISTS ARE IN COMPOSING REFERENCES
title_sort	reference error in book manuscript from lipi: how good our scientists are in composing references
publisher	Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia
publishDate	2020
url	https://doaj.org/article/ac568899542143248d8c6db1958b6e7a
work_keys_str_mv	AT martinushelmiawan referenceerrorinbookmanuscriptfromlipihowgoodourscientistsareincomposingreferences
_version_	1718387161100713984

REFERENCE ERROR IN BOOK MANUSCRIPT FROM LIPI: HOW GOOD OUR SCIENTISTS ARE IN COMPOSING REFERENCES

Ejemplares similares