[74] Giant retroperitoneal lipoma: A case report and review of the literature
Objective: To report on a very rare case of giant retroperitoneal lipoma and a literature review. Retroperitoneal lipomas are an extremely rare condition with only 17 cases described in the literature since 1980. They can reach enormous size and cause significant abdominal symptoms. The most importa...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/acbdf52741ca47438cc6a55190f2650d |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:acbdf52741ca47438cc6a55190f2650d |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:acbdf52741ca47438cc6a55190f2650d2021-12-02T10:15:12Z[74] Giant retroperitoneal lipoma: A case report and review of the literature2090-598X10.1016/j.aju.2018.10.027https://doaj.org/article/acbdf52741ca47438cc6a55190f2650d2018-11-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090598X18301219https://doaj.org/toc/2090-598XObjective: To report on a very rare case of giant retroperitoneal lipoma and a literature review. Retroperitoneal lipomas are an extremely rare condition with only 17 cases described in the literature since 1980. They can reach enormous size and cause significant abdominal symptoms. The most important differential diagnosis is the well-differentiated liposarcoma, which preoperatively often may not definitely be ruled out. Methods: We present the case of a 72-year-old woman with a giant retroperitoneal lipoma. The patient presented with abdominal pain and the appearance of a gradually increasing abdominal mass. The radiological explorations found a voluminous mass of retroperitoneal fatty density having a relationship with the psoas muscle of 17 × 21 cm causing deviation of the intestinal structures. Results: Exploratory laparotomy was indicated with the aim of en bloc total tumour resection for potential malignancy. Intraoperatively demarcated, there were two well-limited and encapsulated masses, the first mass weighed 665 g and measured 18 cm, the second weighed 1750 g and measured 24 cm. The operative follow-up was without incident. Conclusion: Retroperitoneal lipomas are not clearly distinguishable from well-differentiated liposarcomas on imaging and even biopsies may be misleading. Moreover, abdominal symptoms, e.g. pain, constipation and dysphagia, may occur due to mechanical displacement. Therefore, surgical exploration with complete oncological resection is the therapy of choice if malignancy cannot be ruled out.Soumeya LekouaghetBoulatrous AbdelkrimAbdelhalim ChouakriaToui KarimNour Islem KademAmir AtikSina HaiahemMalik AtouiMourad NouacerA. KhennicheAbdelkrim KadiKheireddine ChettibiTaylor & Francis GrouparticleDiseases of the genitourinary system. UrologyRC870-923ENArab Journal of Urology, Vol 16, Iss , Pp S35- (2018) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Diseases of the genitourinary system. Urology RC870-923 |
spellingShingle |
Diseases of the genitourinary system. Urology RC870-923 Soumeya Lekouaghet Boulatrous Abdelkrim Abdelhalim Chouakria Toui Karim Nour Islem Kadem Amir Atik Sina Haiahem Malik Atoui Mourad Nouacer A. Khenniche Abdelkrim Kadi Kheireddine Chettibi [74] Giant retroperitoneal lipoma: A case report and review of the literature |
description |
Objective: To report on a very rare case of giant retroperitoneal lipoma and a literature review. Retroperitoneal lipomas are an extremely rare condition with only 17 cases described in the literature since 1980. They can reach enormous size and cause significant abdominal symptoms. The most important differential diagnosis is the well-differentiated liposarcoma, which preoperatively often may not definitely be ruled out. Methods: We present the case of a 72-year-old woman with a giant retroperitoneal lipoma. The patient presented with abdominal pain and the appearance of a gradually increasing abdominal mass. The radiological explorations found a voluminous mass of retroperitoneal fatty density having a relationship with the psoas muscle of 17 × 21 cm causing deviation of the intestinal structures. Results: Exploratory laparotomy was indicated with the aim of en bloc total tumour resection for potential malignancy. Intraoperatively demarcated, there were two well-limited and encapsulated masses, the first mass weighed 665 g and measured 18 cm, the second weighed 1750 g and measured 24 cm. The operative follow-up was without incident. Conclusion: Retroperitoneal lipomas are not clearly distinguishable from well-differentiated liposarcomas on imaging and even biopsies may be misleading. Moreover, abdominal symptoms, e.g. pain, constipation and dysphagia, may occur due to mechanical displacement. Therefore, surgical exploration with complete oncological resection is the therapy of choice if malignancy cannot be ruled out. |
format |
article |
author |
Soumeya Lekouaghet Boulatrous Abdelkrim Abdelhalim Chouakria Toui Karim Nour Islem Kadem Amir Atik Sina Haiahem Malik Atoui Mourad Nouacer A. Khenniche Abdelkrim Kadi Kheireddine Chettibi |
author_facet |
Soumeya Lekouaghet Boulatrous Abdelkrim Abdelhalim Chouakria Toui Karim Nour Islem Kadem Amir Atik Sina Haiahem Malik Atoui Mourad Nouacer A. Khenniche Abdelkrim Kadi Kheireddine Chettibi |
author_sort |
Soumeya Lekouaghet |
title |
[74] Giant retroperitoneal lipoma: A case report and review of the literature |
title_short |
[74] Giant retroperitoneal lipoma: A case report and review of the literature |
title_full |
[74] Giant retroperitoneal lipoma: A case report and review of the literature |
title_fullStr |
[74] Giant retroperitoneal lipoma: A case report and review of the literature |
title_full_unstemmed |
[74] Giant retroperitoneal lipoma: A case report and review of the literature |
title_sort |
[74] giant retroperitoneal lipoma: a case report and review of the literature |
publisher |
Taylor & Francis Group |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/acbdf52741ca47438cc6a55190f2650d |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT soumeyalekouaghet 74giantretroperitoneallipomaacasereportandreviewoftheliterature AT boulatrousabdelkrim 74giantretroperitoneallipomaacasereportandreviewoftheliterature AT abdelhalimchouakria 74giantretroperitoneallipomaacasereportandreviewoftheliterature AT touikarim 74giantretroperitoneallipomaacasereportandreviewoftheliterature AT nourislemkadem 74giantretroperitoneallipomaacasereportandreviewoftheliterature AT amiratik 74giantretroperitoneallipomaacasereportandreviewoftheliterature AT sinahaiahem 74giantretroperitoneallipomaacasereportandreviewoftheliterature AT malikatoui 74giantretroperitoneallipomaacasereportandreviewoftheliterature AT mouradnouacer 74giantretroperitoneallipomaacasereportandreviewoftheliterature AT akhenniche 74giantretroperitoneallipomaacasereportandreviewoftheliterature AT abdelkrimkadi 74giantretroperitoneallipomaacasereportandreviewoftheliterature AT kheireddinechettibi 74giantretroperitoneallipomaacasereportandreviewoftheliterature |
_version_ |
1718397467666415616 |