Risk score to stratify miscarriage risk levels in preconception women
Abstract Spontaneous miscarriage is one of the most common complications of pregnancy. Even though some risk factors are well documented, there is a paucity of risk scoring tools during preconception. In the S-PRESTO cohort study, Asian women attempting to conceive, aged 18-45 years, were recruited....
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/acd48f21f0944899b5541f6d2cdbee0f |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:acd48f21f0944899b5541f6d2cdbee0f |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:acd48f21f0944899b5541f6d2cdbee0f2021-12-02T14:59:29ZRisk score to stratify miscarriage risk levels in preconception women10.1038/s41598-021-91567-82045-2322https://doaj.org/article/acd48f21f0944899b5541f6d2cdbee0f2021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91567-8https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Spontaneous miscarriage is one of the most common complications of pregnancy. Even though some risk factors are well documented, there is a paucity of risk scoring tools during preconception. In the S-PRESTO cohort study, Asian women attempting to conceive, aged 18-45 years, were recruited. Multivariable logistic regression model coefficients were used to determine risk estimates for age, ethnicity, history of pregnancy loss, body mass index, smoking status, alcohol intake and dietary supplement intake; from these we derived a risk score ranging from 0 to 17. Miscarriage before 16 weeks of gestation, determined clinically or via ultrasound. Among 465 included women, 59 had miscarriages and 406 had pregnancy ≥ 16 weeks of gestation. Higher rates of miscarriage were observed at higher risk scores (5.3% at score ≤ 3, 17.0% at score 4–6, 40.0% at score 7–8 and 46.2% at score ≥ 9). Women with scores ≤ 3 were defined as low-risk level (< 10% miscarriage); scores 4–6 as intermediate-risk level (10% to < 40% miscarriage); scores ≥ 7 as high-risk level (≥ 40% miscarriage). The risk score yielded an area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve of 0.74 (95% confidence interval 0.67, 0.81; p < 0.001). This novel scoring tool allows women to self-evaluate their miscarriage risk level, which facilitates lifestyle changes to optimize modifiable risk factors in the preconception period and reduces risk of spontaneous miscarriage.Xin Hui ChooChee Wai KuYin Bun CheungKeith M. GodfreyYap-Seng ChongLynette Pei-Chi ShekKok Hian TanThiam Chye TanSadhana NadarajahFabian Kok Peng YapMarjorelee T. ColegaMary Foong-Fong ChongShiao-Yng ChanSee Ling LoyJerry Kok Yen ChanNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Xin Hui Choo Chee Wai Ku Yin Bun Cheung Keith M. Godfrey Yap-Seng Chong Lynette Pei-Chi Shek Kok Hian Tan Thiam Chye Tan Sadhana Nadarajah Fabian Kok Peng Yap Marjorelee T. Colega Mary Foong-Fong Chong Shiao-Yng Chan See Ling Loy Jerry Kok Yen Chan Risk score to stratify miscarriage risk levels in preconception women |
description |
Abstract Spontaneous miscarriage is one of the most common complications of pregnancy. Even though some risk factors are well documented, there is a paucity of risk scoring tools during preconception. In the S-PRESTO cohort study, Asian women attempting to conceive, aged 18-45 years, were recruited. Multivariable logistic regression model coefficients were used to determine risk estimates for age, ethnicity, history of pregnancy loss, body mass index, smoking status, alcohol intake and dietary supplement intake; from these we derived a risk score ranging from 0 to 17. Miscarriage before 16 weeks of gestation, determined clinically or via ultrasound. Among 465 included women, 59 had miscarriages and 406 had pregnancy ≥ 16 weeks of gestation. Higher rates of miscarriage were observed at higher risk scores (5.3% at score ≤ 3, 17.0% at score 4–6, 40.0% at score 7–8 and 46.2% at score ≥ 9). Women with scores ≤ 3 were defined as low-risk level (< 10% miscarriage); scores 4–6 as intermediate-risk level (10% to < 40% miscarriage); scores ≥ 7 as high-risk level (≥ 40% miscarriage). The risk score yielded an area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve of 0.74 (95% confidence interval 0.67, 0.81; p < 0.001). This novel scoring tool allows women to self-evaluate their miscarriage risk level, which facilitates lifestyle changes to optimize modifiable risk factors in the preconception period and reduces risk of spontaneous miscarriage. |
format |
article |
author |
Xin Hui Choo Chee Wai Ku Yin Bun Cheung Keith M. Godfrey Yap-Seng Chong Lynette Pei-Chi Shek Kok Hian Tan Thiam Chye Tan Sadhana Nadarajah Fabian Kok Peng Yap Marjorelee T. Colega Mary Foong-Fong Chong Shiao-Yng Chan See Ling Loy Jerry Kok Yen Chan |
author_facet |
Xin Hui Choo Chee Wai Ku Yin Bun Cheung Keith M. Godfrey Yap-Seng Chong Lynette Pei-Chi Shek Kok Hian Tan Thiam Chye Tan Sadhana Nadarajah Fabian Kok Peng Yap Marjorelee T. Colega Mary Foong-Fong Chong Shiao-Yng Chan See Ling Loy Jerry Kok Yen Chan |
author_sort |
Xin Hui Choo |
title |
Risk score to stratify miscarriage risk levels in preconception women |
title_short |
Risk score to stratify miscarriage risk levels in preconception women |
title_full |
Risk score to stratify miscarriage risk levels in preconception women |
title_fullStr |
Risk score to stratify miscarriage risk levels in preconception women |
title_full_unstemmed |
Risk score to stratify miscarriage risk levels in preconception women |
title_sort |
risk score to stratify miscarriage risk levels in preconception women |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/acd48f21f0944899b5541f6d2cdbee0f |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT xinhuichoo riskscoretostratifymiscarriagerisklevelsinpreconceptionwomen AT cheewaiku riskscoretostratifymiscarriagerisklevelsinpreconceptionwomen AT yinbuncheung riskscoretostratifymiscarriagerisklevelsinpreconceptionwomen AT keithmgodfrey riskscoretostratifymiscarriagerisklevelsinpreconceptionwomen AT yapsengchong riskscoretostratifymiscarriagerisklevelsinpreconceptionwomen AT lynettepeichishek riskscoretostratifymiscarriagerisklevelsinpreconceptionwomen AT kokhiantan riskscoretostratifymiscarriagerisklevelsinpreconceptionwomen AT thiamchyetan riskscoretostratifymiscarriagerisklevelsinpreconceptionwomen AT sadhananadarajah riskscoretostratifymiscarriagerisklevelsinpreconceptionwomen AT fabiankokpengyap riskscoretostratifymiscarriagerisklevelsinpreconceptionwomen AT marjoreleetcolega riskscoretostratifymiscarriagerisklevelsinpreconceptionwomen AT maryfoongfongchong riskscoretostratifymiscarriagerisklevelsinpreconceptionwomen AT shiaoyngchan riskscoretostratifymiscarriagerisklevelsinpreconceptionwomen AT seelingloy riskscoretostratifymiscarriagerisklevelsinpreconceptionwomen AT jerrykokyenchan riskscoretostratifymiscarriagerisklevelsinpreconceptionwomen |
_version_ |
1718389224388952064 |