Estimated Cost Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccination for Emergency Medical Services Professionals

Introduction: Because of their frequent contact with compromised patients, vaccination against influenza is recommended for all healthcare workers. Recent studies suggest that vaccination decreases influenza transmission to patients and reduces worker illness and absenteeism. However, few emergency...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Michael W. Hubble, Ginny K. Renkiewicz
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: eScholarship Publishing, University of California 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/ace121aa245c49a5a93aa040b785ea83
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:ace121aa245c49a5a93aa040b785ea83
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:ace121aa245c49a5a93aa040b785ea832021-11-17T15:19:27ZEstimated Cost Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccination for Emergency Medical Services Professionals1936-901810.5811/westjem.2021.7.50681https://doaj.org/article/ace121aa245c49a5a93aa040b785ea832021-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://escholarship.org/uc/item/0hn9b7jhhttps://doaj.org/toc/1936-9018Introduction: Because of their frequent contact with compromised patients, vaccination against influenza is recommended for all healthcare workers. Recent studies suggest that vaccination decreases influenza transmission to patients and reduces worker illness and absenteeism. However, few emergency medical services (EMS) agencies provide annual vaccination, and the vaccination rate among EMS personnel remains low. Reticence among EMS agencies to provide influenza vaccination to their employees may be due in part to the unknown fiscal consequences of implementing a vaccination program. In this study, we sought to estimate the cost effectiveness of an employer-provided influenza vaccination program for EMS personnel. Methods: Using data from published reports on influenza vaccination, we developed a cost-effectiveness model of vaccination for a hypothesized EMS system of 100 employees. Model inputs included vaccination costs, vaccination rate, infection rate, costs associated with absenteeism, lost productivity due to working while ill (presenteeism), and medical care for treating illness. To assess the robustness of the model we performed a series of sensitivity analyses on the input variables. Results: The proportion of employees contracting influenza or influenza-like illness (ILI) was estimated at 19% among vaccinated employees compared to 26% among non-vaccinated employees. The costs of the vaccine, consumables, and employee time for vaccination totaled $44.19 per vaccinated employee, with a total system cost of $4,419. Compared to no vaccination, a mandatory vaccination program would save $20,745 in lost productivity and medical costs, or $16,325 in net savings after accounting for vaccination costs. The savings were 3.7 times the cost of the vaccination program and were derived from avoided absenteeism ($7,988), avoided presenteeism productivity losses ($10,303), and avoided medical costs of treating employees with influenza/ILI ($2,454). Through sensitivity analyses the model was verified to be robust across a wide range of input variable assumptions. The net monetary benefits were positive across all ranges of input assumptions, but cost savings were most sensitive to the vaccination uptake rate, ILI rate, and presenteeism productivity losses. Conclusion: This cost-effectiveness analysis suggests that an employer-provided influenza vaccination program is a financially favorable strategy for reducing costs associated with influenza/ILI employee absenteeism, presenteeism, and medical care.Michael W. HubbleGinny K. RenkiewiczeScholarship Publishing, University of CaliforniaarticleMedicineRMedical emergencies. Critical care. Intensive care. First aidRC86-88.9ENWestern Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol 22, Iss 6 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Medical emergencies. Critical care. Intensive care. First aid
RC86-88.9
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Medical emergencies. Critical care. Intensive care. First aid
RC86-88.9
Michael W. Hubble
Ginny K. Renkiewicz
Estimated Cost Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccination for Emergency Medical Services Professionals
description Introduction: Because of their frequent contact with compromised patients, vaccination against influenza is recommended for all healthcare workers. Recent studies suggest that vaccination decreases influenza transmission to patients and reduces worker illness and absenteeism. However, few emergency medical services (EMS) agencies provide annual vaccination, and the vaccination rate among EMS personnel remains low. Reticence among EMS agencies to provide influenza vaccination to their employees may be due in part to the unknown fiscal consequences of implementing a vaccination program. In this study, we sought to estimate the cost effectiveness of an employer-provided influenza vaccination program for EMS personnel. Methods: Using data from published reports on influenza vaccination, we developed a cost-effectiveness model of vaccination for a hypothesized EMS system of 100 employees. Model inputs included vaccination costs, vaccination rate, infection rate, costs associated with absenteeism, lost productivity due to working while ill (presenteeism), and medical care for treating illness. To assess the robustness of the model we performed a series of sensitivity analyses on the input variables. Results: The proportion of employees contracting influenza or influenza-like illness (ILI) was estimated at 19% among vaccinated employees compared to 26% among non-vaccinated employees. The costs of the vaccine, consumables, and employee time for vaccination totaled $44.19 per vaccinated employee, with a total system cost of $4,419. Compared to no vaccination, a mandatory vaccination program would save $20,745 in lost productivity and medical costs, or $16,325 in net savings after accounting for vaccination costs. The savings were 3.7 times the cost of the vaccination program and were derived from avoided absenteeism ($7,988), avoided presenteeism productivity losses ($10,303), and avoided medical costs of treating employees with influenza/ILI ($2,454). Through sensitivity analyses the model was verified to be robust across a wide range of input variable assumptions. The net monetary benefits were positive across all ranges of input assumptions, but cost savings were most sensitive to the vaccination uptake rate, ILI rate, and presenteeism productivity losses. Conclusion: This cost-effectiveness analysis suggests that an employer-provided influenza vaccination program is a financially favorable strategy for reducing costs associated with influenza/ILI employee absenteeism, presenteeism, and medical care.
format article
author Michael W. Hubble
Ginny K. Renkiewicz
author_facet Michael W. Hubble
Ginny K. Renkiewicz
author_sort Michael W. Hubble
title Estimated Cost Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccination for Emergency Medical Services Professionals
title_short Estimated Cost Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccination for Emergency Medical Services Professionals
title_full Estimated Cost Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccination for Emergency Medical Services Professionals
title_fullStr Estimated Cost Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccination for Emergency Medical Services Professionals
title_full_unstemmed Estimated Cost Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccination for Emergency Medical Services Professionals
title_sort estimated cost effectiveness of influenza vaccination for emergency medical services professionals
publisher eScholarship Publishing, University of California
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/ace121aa245c49a5a93aa040b785ea83
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelwhubble estimatedcosteffectivenessofinfluenzavaccinationforemergencymedicalservicesprofessionals
AT ginnykrenkiewicz estimatedcosteffectivenessofinfluenzavaccinationforemergencymedicalservicesprofessionals
_version_ 1718425436384395264