The use of diversity indices for local assessment of marine sediment quality

Abstract Diversity indices are commonly used to measure changes in marine benthic communities. However, the reliability (and therefore suitability) of these indices for detecting environmental change is often unclear because of small sample size and the inappropriate choice of communities for analys...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shinya Hosokawa, Kyosuke Momota, Anthony A. Chariton, Ryoji Naito, Yoshiyuki Nakamura
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/ace5eacacf0e40cea844dfbd283ac2fc
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:ace5eacacf0e40cea844dfbd283ac2fc
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:ace5eacacf0e40cea844dfbd283ac2fc2021-12-02T16:26:38ZThe use of diversity indices for local assessment of marine sediment quality10.1038/s41598-021-94636-02045-2322https://doaj.org/article/ace5eacacf0e40cea844dfbd283ac2fc2021-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94636-0https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Diversity indices are commonly used to measure changes in marine benthic communities. However, the reliability (and therefore suitability) of these indices for detecting environmental change is often unclear because of small sample size and the inappropriate choice of communities for analysis. This study explored uncertainties in taxonomic density and two indices of community structure in our target region, Japan, and in two local areas within this region, and explored potential solutions. Our analysis of the Japanese regional dataset showed a decrease in family density and a dominance of a few species as sediment conditions become degraded. Local case studies showed that species density is affected by sediment degradation at sites where multiple communities coexist. However, two indices of community structure could become insensitive because of masking by community variability, and small sample size sometimes caused misleading or inaccurate estimates of these indices. We conclude that species density is a sensitive indicator of change in marine benthic communities, and emphasise that indices of community structure should only be used when the community structure of the target community is distinguishable from other coexisting communities and there is sufficient sample size.Shinya HosokawaKyosuke MomotaAnthony A. CharitonRyoji NaitoYoshiyuki NakamuraNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Shinya Hosokawa
Kyosuke Momota
Anthony A. Chariton
Ryoji Naito
Yoshiyuki Nakamura
The use of diversity indices for local assessment of marine sediment quality
description Abstract Diversity indices are commonly used to measure changes in marine benthic communities. However, the reliability (and therefore suitability) of these indices for detecting environmental change is often unclear because of small sample size and the inappropriate choice of communities for analysis. This study explored uncertainties in taxonomic density and two indices of community structure in our target region, Japan, and in two local areas within this region, and explored potential solutions. Our analysis of the Japanese regional dataset showed a decrease in family density and a dominance of a few species as sediment conditions become degraded. Local case studies showed that species density is affected by sediment degradation at sites where multiple communities coexist. However, two indices of community structure could become insensitive because of masking by community variability, and small sample size sometimes caused misleading or inaccurate estimates of these indices. We conclude that species density is a sensitive indicator of change in marine benthic communities, and emphasise that indices of community structure should only be used when the community structure of the target community is distinguishable from other coexisting communities and there is sufficient sample size.
format article
author Shinya Hosokawa
Kyosuke Momota
Anthony A. Chariton
Ryoji Naito
Yoshiyuki Nakamura
author_facet Shinya Hosokawa
Kyosuke Momota
Anthony A. Chariton
Ryoji Naito
Yoshiyuki Nakamura
author_sort Shinya Hosokawa
title The use of diversity indices for local assessment of marine sediment quality
title_short The use of diversity indices for local assessment of marine sediment quality
title_full The use of diversity indices for local assessment of marine sediment quality
title_fullStr The use of diversity indices for local assessment of marine sediment quality
title_full_unstemmed The use of diversity indices for local assessment of marine sediment quality
title_sort use of diversity indices for local assessment of marine sediment quality
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/ace5eacacf0e40cea844dfbd283ac2fc
work_keys_str_mv AT shinyahosokawa theuseofdiversityindicesforlocalassessmentofmarinesedimentquality
AT kyosukemomota theuseofdiversityindicesforlocalassessmentofmarinesedimentquality
AT anthonyachariton theuseofdiversityindicesforlocalassessmentofmarinesedimentquality
AT ryojinaito theuseofdiversityindicesforlocalassessmentofmarinesedimentquality
AT yoshiyukinakamura theuseofdiversityindicesforlocalassessmentofmarinesedimentquality
AT shinyahosokawa useofdiversityindicesforlocalassessmentofmarinesedimentquality
AT kyosukemomota useofdiversityindicesforlocalassessmentofmarinesedimentquality
AT anthonyachariton useofdiversityindicesforlocalassessmentofmarinesedimentquality
AT ryojinaito useofdiversityindicesforlocalassessmentofmarinesedimentquality
AT yoshiyukinakamura useofdiversityindicesforlocalassessmentofmarinesedimentquality
_version_ 1718384010906828800