Brazilian Consumers’ Attitudes towards So-Called “Cell-Based Meat”

The main goal of this online survey was to investigate the attitudes of Brazilians towards “cell-based meat”, which has become the subject of great scientific and media enthusiasm. The answers of 4471 respondents concluded that 46.6% of them thought “cell-based meat” was promising and acceptable. Mo...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sghaier Chriki, Vincent Payet, Sérgio Bertelli Pflanzer, Marie-Pierre Ellies-Oury, Jingjing Liu, Élise Hocquette, Jonatã Henrique Rezende-de-Souza, Jean-François Hocquette
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/ad02362f76c34e2fbb391be011798a3c
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:ad02362f76c34e2fbb391be011798a3c
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:ad02362f76c34e2fbb391be011798a3c2021-11-25T17:33:01ZBrazilian Consumers’ Attitudes towards So-Called “Cell-Based Meat”10.3390/foods101125882304-8158https://doaj.org/article/ad02362f76c34e2fbb391be011798a3c2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/10/11/2588https://doaj.org/toc/2304-8158The main goal of this online survey was to investigate the attitudes of Brazilians towards “cell-based meat”, which has become the subject of great scientific and media enthusiasm. The answers of 4471 respondents concluded that 46.6% of them thought “cell-based meat” was promising and acceptable. More than 66% would be willing to try this novel product compared to 23% who expressed reluctance to do so. Nearly 40% of the total respondents did not want to eat “cell-based meat” regularly at all, whereas 29%, 43.2%, and 39.9% were willing to eat it regularly in restaurants, at home, and/or in ready-made meals, respectively. However, the majority of respondents (71%) were keen to pay much less for “cell-based meat” than conventionally produced meat (or even nothing at all), compared to 24.3% who were willing to pay the same price as conventional meat, whereas only 4.8% were willing to pay more. Approximately 51% of them considered that “cell-based meat” should not be called “meat” for marketing purposes. Job, monthly income, age, and gender were major factors impacting consumer acceptance. Meat professionals and consumers with higher incomes were less willing to eat “cell-based meat” regularly. Women (especially younger women) were the most concerned about the ethical and environmental issues related to meat production and were the most convinced that reducing meat consumption could be a good solution to the meat industry’s problems. Respondents who did not accept “cell-based meat” and did not eat meat substitutes had a negative attitude to this novel food (they considered it absurd and/or disgusting) and did not believe that “cell-based meat” should be called “meat” for marketing purposes. In contrast, the people who thought that “cell-based meat” could be called “meat” perceived it in a rather positive way. These results are important for consumers of meat and meat substitutes and for companies aiming to enter the potential future Brazilian market of “cell-based meat”.Sghaier ChrikiVincent PayetSérgio Bertelli PflanzerMarie-Pierre Ellies-OuryJingjing LiuÉlise HocquetteJonatã Henrique Rezende-de-SouzaJean-François HocquetteMDPI AGarticlemeat alternativesfood securitysurveylivestock issuesanimal protectionanimal welfareChemical technologyTP1-1185ENFoods, Vol 10, Iss 2588, p 2588 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic meat alternatives
food security
survey
livestock issues
animal protection
animal welfare
Chemical technology
TP1-1185
spellingShingle meat alternatives
food security
survey
livestock issues
animal protection
animal welfare
Chemical technology
TP1-1185
Sghaier Chriki
Vincent Payet
Sérgio Bertelli Pflanzer
Marie-Pierre Ellies-Oury
Jingjing Liu
Élise Hocquette
Jonatã Henrique Rezende-de-Souza
Jean-François Hocquette
Brazilian Consumers’ Attitudes towards So-Called “Cell-Based Meat”
description The main goal of this online survey was to investigate the attitudes of Brazilians towards “cell-based meat”, which has become the subject of great scientific and media enthusiasm. The answers of 4471 respondents concluded that 46.6% of them thought “cell-based meat” was promising and acceptable. More than 66% would be willing to try this novel product compared to 23% who expressed reluctance to do so. Nearly 40% of the total respondents did not want to eat “cell-based meat” regularly at all, whereas 29%, 43.2%, and 39.9% were willing to eat it regularly in restaurants, at home, and/or in ready-made meals, respectively. However, the majority of respondents (71%) were keen to pay much less for “cell-based meat” than conventionally produced meat (or even nothing at all), compared to 24.3% who were willing to pay the same price as conventional meat, whereas only 4.8% were willing to pay more. Approximately 51% of them considered that “cell-based meat” should not be called “meat” for marketing purposes. Job, monthly income, age, and gender were major factors impacting consumer acceptance. Meat professionals and consumers with higher incomes were less willing to eat “cell-based meat” regularly. Women (especially younger women) were the most concerned about the ethical and environmental issues related to meat production and were the most convinced that reducing meat consumption could be a good solution to the meat industry’s problems. Respondents who did not accept “cell-based meat” and did not eat meat substitutes had a negative attitude to this novel food (they considered it absurd and/or disgusting) and did not believe that “cell-based meat” should be called “meat” for marketing purposes. In contrast, the people who thought that “cell-based meat” could be called “meat” perceived it in a rather positive way. These results are important for consumers of meat and meat substitutes and for companies aiming to enter the potential future Brazilian market of “cell-based meat”.
format article
author Sghaier Chriki
Vincent Payet
Sérgio Bertelli Pflanzer
Marie-Pierre Ellies-Oury
Jingjing Liu
Élise Hocquette
Jonatã Henrique Rezende-de-Souza
Jean-François Hocquette
author_facet Sghaier Chriki
Vincent Payet
Sérgio Bertelli Pflanzer
Marie-Pierre Ellies-Oury
Jingjing Liu
Élise Hocquette
Jonatã Henrique Rezende-de-Souza
Jean-François Hocquette
author_sort Sghaier Chriki
title Brazilian Consumers’ Attitudes towards So-Called “Cell-Based Meat”
title_short Brazilian Consumers’ Attitudes towards So-Called “Cell-Based Meat”
title_full Brazilian Consumers’ Attitudes towards So-Called “Cell-Based Meat”
title_fullStr Brazilian Consumers’ Attitudes towards So-Called “Cell-Based Meat”
title_full_unstemmed Brazilian Consumers’ Attitudes towards So-Called “Cell-Based Meat”
title_sort brazilian consumers’ attitudes towards so-called “cell-based meat”
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/ad02362f76c34e2fbb391be011798a3c
work_keys_str_mv AT sghaierchriki brazilianconsumersattitudestowardssocalledcellbasedmeat
AT vincentpayet brazilianconsumersattitudestowardssocalledcellbasedmeat
AT sergiobertellipflanzer brazilianconsumersattitudestowardssocalledcellbasedmeat
AT mariepierreelliesoury brazilianconsumersattitudestowardssocalledcellbasedmeat
AT jingjingliu brazilianconsumersattitudestowardssocalledcellbasedmeat
AT elisehocquette brazilianconsumersattitudestowardssocalledcellbasedmeat
AT jonatahenriquerezendedesouza brazilianconsumersattitudestowardssocalledcellbasedmeat
AT jeanfrancoishocquette brazilianconsumersattitudestowardssocalledcellbasedmeat
_version_ 1718412245035122688