Dušan Bandić – context, opus, significance

The scientific opus of Dušan Bandić is viewed through the context and time frame in which he started researching folk religion in order to, through the analysis of his most important texts, arrive at the conclusion about the importance of his opus for the modernization of Serbian anthropology. This...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ivan Kovačević
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
FR
SR
Publicado: University of Belgrade 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/ad653923f4364912a0a0ee17ad3d51cf
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:ad653923f4364912a0a0ee17ad3d51cf
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:ad653923f4364912a0a0ee17ad3d51cf2021-12-02T00:54:11ZDušan Bandić – context, opus, significance10.21301/eap.v9i1.10353-15892334-8801https://doaj.org/article/ad653923f4364912a0a0ee17ad3d51cf2016-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://eap-iea.org/index.php/eap/article/view/29https://doaj.org/toc/0353-1589https://doaj.org/toc/2334-8801 The scientific opus of Dušan Bandić is viewed through the context and time frame in which he started researching folk religion in order to, through the analysis of his most important texts, arrive at the conclusion about the importance of his opus for the modernization of Serbian anthropology. This is just one segment, although the most important one, of the evaluation of the significance of an opus for the history of Serbian anthropology. Other aspects of action, which refer to institutional positioning and activity as well as one’s social and political life and ultimately the consequences such actions had are significant for the history of science, but are not encompassed by this paper. The paper deals with the description of the context and state of research into folk religion at the beginning of Bandić’s career and the general knowledge about global anthropological trends in Serbian ethnology at the time. Afterwards the focus is shifted to the contents of his work through viewing the larger ideas and methodological systems present in Bandić’s work – evolutionism, functionalism and structuralism, in order to, ultimately, come to a conclusion about the development of methods which Bandić applied, as well as the place which his opus occupied in a crucial time for Serbian ethnology. Ivan KovačevićUniversity of BelgradearticleDušan Bandićfolk religionevolutionismfunctional analysisstructural analysisSerbian anthropologyAnthropologyGN1-890ENFRSREtnoantropološki Problemi, Vol 9, Iss 1 (2016)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
FR
SR
topic Dušan Bandić
folk religion
evolutionism
functional analysis
structural analysis
Serbian anthropology
Anthropology
GN1-890
spellingShingle Dušan Bandić
folk religion
evolutionism
functional analysis
structural analysis
Serbian anthropology
Anthropology
GN1-890
Ivan Kovačević
Dušan Bandić – context, opus, significance
description The scientific opus of Dušan Bandić is viewed through the context and time frame in which he started researching folk religion in order to, through the analysis of his most important texts, arrive at the conclusion about the importance of his opus for the modernization of Serbian anthropology. This is just one segment, although the most important one, of the evaluation of the significance of an opus for the history of Serbian anthropology. Other aspects of action, which refer to institutional positioning and activity as well as one’s social and political life and ultimately the consequences such actions had are significant for the history of science, but are not encompassed by this paper. The paper deals with the description of the context and state of research into folk religion at the beginning of Bandić’s career and the general knowledge about global anthropological trends in Serbian ethnology at the time. Afterwards the focus is shifted to the contents of his work through viewing the larger ideas and methodological systems present in Bandić’s work – evolutionism, functionalism and structuralism, in order to, ultimately, come to a conclusion about the development of methods which Bandić applied, as well as the place which his opus occupied in a crucial time for Serbian ethnology.
format article
author Ivan Kovačević
author_facet Ivan Kovačević
author_sort Ivan Kovačević
title Dušan Bandić – context, opus, significance
title_short Dušan Bandić – context, opus, significance
title_full Dušan Bandić – context, opus, significance
title_fullStr Dušan Bandić – context, opus, significance
title_full_unstemmed Dušan Bandić – context, opus, significance
title_sort dušan bandić – context, opus, significance
publisher University of Belgrade
publishDate 2016
url https://doaj.org/article/ad653923f4364912a0a0ee17ad3d51cf
work_keys_str_mv AT ivankovacevic dusanbandiccontextopussignificance
_version_ 1718403460276158464