Assessment of effect of different sterilization agents on dimensional accuracy of different impression materials in implant prosthesis – An In vitro study
Aim: Sterilization of impression materials is of paramount importance. The present study was conducted to compare the effect of different disinfectants on dimensional accuracy of elastomeric impression materials used for implant prosthesis and other routine treatments. Materials and Methods: The pre...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/ad7a4320409a4c34815faef8ce7cb1f8 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:ad7a4320409a4c34815faef8ce7cb1f8 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:ad7a4320409a4c34815faef8ce7cb1f82021-11-19T12:15:53ZAssessment of effect of different sterilization agents on dimensional accuracy of different impression materials in implant prosthesis – An In vitro study0975-740610.4103/jpbs.jpbs_315_21https://doaj.org/article/ad7a4320409a4c34815faef8ce7cb1f82021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2021;volume=13;issue=6;spage=1620;epage=1623;aulast=Kavitahttps://doaj.org/toc/0975-7406Aim: Sterilization of impression materials is of paramount importance. The present study was conducted to compare the effect of different disinfectants on dimensional accuracy of elastomeric impression materials used for implant prosthesis and other routine treatments. Materials and Methods: The present study was conducted with polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) (regular body), PVS (medium body), PVS (heavy body), and polyether (medium body) impression materials. Glutaraldehyde (2%) and sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl, 0.525%) were the disinfectant solutions employed in the study. After 16 h, the specimens were measured under Leica WILD stereomicroscope and dimensions were compared with master die. Results: The dimensional change in the Controls, 2% glutaraldehyde (Group I), and 0.525% NaOCl (Group II) was non significant where as Group III and Group IV showed statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). Results also showed significantly higher tear strength (newton/millimeter) in Control group followed by Group I and Group II. Conclusion: PVS (heavy body) was found to be most stable, and polyether was seen to be stable of all the impression materials.Kumari KavitaK R Parameshwar ReddyK R Maheshwar ReddySwatantra KumarGyanendra PandeyRevati SinghWolters Kluwer Medknow Publicationsarticledisinfectantglutaraldehydepolyvinyl siloxanePharmacy and materia medicaRS1-441Analytical chemistryQD71-142ENJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences, Vol 13, Iss 6, Pp 1620-1623 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
disinfectant glutaraldehyde polyvinyl siloxane Pharmacy and materia medica RS1-441 Analytical chemistry QD71-142 |
spellingShingle |
disinfectant glutaraldehyde polyvinyl siloxane Pharmacy and materia medica RS1-441 Analytical chemistry QD71-142 Kumari Kavita K R Parameshwar Reddy K R Maheshwar Reddy Swatantra Kumar Gyanendra Pandey Revati Singh Assessment of effect of different sterilization agents on dimensional accuracy of different impression materials in implant prosthesis – An In vitro study |
description |
Aim: Sterilization of impression materials is of paramount importance. The present study was conducted to compare the effect of different disinfectants on dimensional accuracy of elastomeric impression materials used for implant prosthesis and other routine treatments. Materials and Methods: The present study was conducted with polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) (regular body), PVS (medium body), PVS (heavy body), and polyether (medium body) impression materials. Glutaraldehyde (2%) and sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl, 0.525%) were the disinfectant solutions employed in the study. After 16 h, the specimens were measured under Leica WILD stereomicroscope and dimensions were compared with master die. Results: The dimensional change in the Controls, 2% glutaraldehyde (Group I), and 0.525% NaOCl (Group II) was non significant where as Group III and Group IV showed statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). Results also showed significantly higher tear strength (newton/millimeter) in Control group followed by Group I and Group II. Conclusion: PVS (heavy body) was found to be most stable, and polyether was seen to be stable of all the impression materials. |
format |
article |
author |
Kumari Kavita K R Parameshwar Reddy K R Maheshwar Reddy Swatantra Kumar Gyanendra Pandey Revati Singh |
author_facet |
Kumari Kavita K R Parameshwar Reddy K R Maheshwar Reddy Swatantra Kumar Gyanendra Pandey Revati Singh |
author_sort |
Kumari Kavita |
title |
Assessment of effect of different sterilization agents on dimensional accuracy of different impression materials in implant prosthesis – An In vitro study |
title_short |
Assessment of effect of different sterilization agents on dimensional accuracy of different impression materials in implant prosthesis – An In vitro study |
title_full |
Assessment of effect of different sterilization agents on dimensional accuracy of different impression materials in implant prosthesis – An In vitro study |
title_fullStr |
Assessment of effect of different sterilization agents on dimensional accuracy of different impression materials in implant prosthesis – An In vitro study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assessment of effect of different sterilization agents on dimensional accuracy of different impression materials in implant prosthesis – An In vitro study |
title_sort |
assessment of effect of different sterilization agents on dimensional accuracy of different impression materials in implant prosthesis – an in vitro study |
publisher |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/ad7a4320409a4c34815faef8ce7cb1f8 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kumarikavita assessmentofeffectofdifferentsterilizationagentsondimensionalaccuracyofdifferentimpressionmaterialsinimplantprosthesisaninvitrostudy AT krparameshwarreddy assessmentofeffectofdifferentsterilizationagentsondimensionalaccuracyofdifferentimpressionmaterialsinimplantprosthesisaninvitrostudy AT krmaheshwarreddy assessmentofeffectofdifferentsterilizationagentsondimensionalaccuracyofdifferentimpressionmaterialsinimplantprosthesisaninvitrostudy AT swatantrakumar assessmentofeffectofdifferentsterilizationagentsondimensionalaccuracyofdifferentimpressionmaterialsinimplantprosthesisaninvitrostudy AT gyanendrapandey assessmentofeffectofdifferentsterilizationagentsondimensionalaccuracyofdifferentimpressionmaterialsinimplantprosthesisaninvitrostudy AT revatisingh assessmentofeffectofdifferentsterilizationagentsondimensionalaccuracyofdifferentimpressionmaterialsinimplantprosthesisaninvitrostudy |
_version_ |
1718420151788896256 |