Assessment of effect of different sterilization agents on dimensional accuracy of different impression materials in implant prosthesis – An In vitro study

Aim: Sterilization of impression materials is of paramount importance. The present study was conducted to compare the effect of different disinfectants on dimensional accuracy of elastomeric impression materials used for implant prosthesis and other routine treatments. Materials and Methods: The pre...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumari Kavita, K R Parameshwar Reddy, K R Maheshwar Reddy, Swatantra Kumar, Gyanendra Pandey, Revati Singh
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/ad7a4320409a4c34815faef8ce7cb1f8
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:ad7a4320409a4c34815faef8ce7cb1f8
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:ad7a4320409a4c34815faef8ce7cb1f82021-11-19T12:15:53ZAssessment of effect of different sterilization agents on dimensional accuracy of different impression materials in implant prosthesis – An In vitro study0975-740610.4103/jpbs.jpbs_315_21https://doaj.org/article/ad7a4320409a4c34815faef8ce7cb1f82021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2021;volume=13;issue=6;spage=1620;epage=1623;aulast=Kavitahttps://doaj.org/toc/0975-7406Aim: Sterilization of impression materials is of paramount importance. The present study was conducted to compare the effect of different disinfectants on dimensional accuracy of elastomeric impression materials used for implant prosthesis and other routine treatments. Materials and Methods: The present study was conducted with polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) (regular body), PVS (medium body), PVS (heavy body), and polyether (medium body) impression materials. Glutaraldehyde (2%) and sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl, 0.525%) were the disinfectant solutions employed in the study. After 16 h, the specimens were measured under Leica WILD stereomicroscope and dimensions were compared with master die. Results: The dimensional change in the Controls, 2% glutaraldehyde (Group I), and 0.525% NaOCl (Group II) was non significant where as Group III and Group IV showed statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). Results also showed significantly higher tear strength (newton/millimeter) in Control group followed by Group I and Group II. Conclusion: PVS (heavy body) was found to be most stable, and polyether was seen to be stable of all the impression materials.Kumari KavitaK R Parameshwar ReddyK R Maheshwar ReddySwatantra KumarGyanendra PandeyRevati SinghWolters Kluwer Medknow Publicationsarticledisinfectantglutaraldehydepolyvinyl siloxanePharmacy and materia medicaRS1-441Analytical chemistryQD71-142ENJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences, Vol 13, Iss 6, Pp 1620-1623 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic disinfectant
glutaraldehyde
polyvinyl siloxane
Pharmacy and materia medica
RS1-441
Analytical chemistry
QD71-142
spellingShingle disinfectant
glutaraldehyde
polyvinyl siloxane
Pharmacy and materia medica
RS1-441
Analytical chemistry
QD71-142
Kumari Kavita
K R Parameshwar Reddy
K R Maheshwar Reddy
Swatantra Kumar
Gyanendra Pandey
Revati Singh
Assessment of effect of different sterilization agents on dimensional accuracy of different impression materials in implant prosthesis – An In vitro study
description Aim: Sterilization of impression materials is of paramount importance. The present study was conducted to compare the effect of different disinfectants on dimensional accuracy of elastomeric impression materials used for implant prosthesis and other routine treatments. Materials and Methods: The present study was conducted with polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) (regular body), PVS (medium body), PVS (heavy body), and polyether (medium body) impression materials. Glutaraldehyde (2%) and sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl, 0.525%) were the disinfectant solutions employed in the study. After 16 h, the specimens were measured under Leica WILD stereomicroscope and dimensions were compared with master die. Results: The dimensional change in the Controls, 2% glutaraldehyde (Group I), and 0.525% NaOCl (Group II) was non significant where as Group III and Group IV showed statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). Results also showed significantly higher tear strength (newton/millimeter) in Control group followed by Group I and Group II. Conclusion: PVS (heavy body) was found to be most stable, and polyether was seen to be stable of all the impression materials.
format article
author Kumari Kavita
K R Parameshwar Reddy
K R Maheshwar Reddy
Swatantra Kumar
Gyanendra Pandey
Revati Singh
author_facet Kumari Kavita
K R Parameshwar Reddy
K R Maheshwar Reddy
Swatantra Kumar
Gyanendra Pandey
Revati Singh
author_sort Kumari Kavita
title Assessment of effect of different sterilization agents on dimensional accuracy of different impression materials in implant prosthesis – An In vitro study
title_short Assessment of effect of different sterilization agents on dimensional accuracy of different impression materials in implant prosthesis – An In vitro study
title_full Assessment of effect of different sterilization agents on dimensional accuracy of different impression materials in implant prosthesis – An In vitro study
title_fullStr Assessment of effect of different sterilization agents on dimensional accuracy of different impression materials in implant prosthesis – An In vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of effect of different sterilization agents on dimensional accuracy of different impression materials in implant prosthesis – An In vitro study
title_sort assessment of effect of different sterilization agents on dimensional accuracy of different impression materials in implant prosthesis – an in vitro study
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/ad7a4320409a4c34815faef8ce7cb1f8
work_keys_str_mv AT kumarikavita assessmentofeffectofdifferentsterilizationagentsondimensionalaccuracyofdifferentimpressionmaterialsinimplantprosthesisaninvitrostudy
AT krparameshwarreddy assessmentofeffectofdifferentsterilizationagentsondimensionalaccuracyofdifferentimpressionmaterialsinimplantprosthesisaninvitrostudy
AT krmaheshwarreddy assessmentofeffectofdifferentsterilizationagentsondimensionalaccuracyofdifferentimpressionmaterialsinimplantprosthesisaninvitrostudy
AT swatantrakumar assessmentofeffectofdifferentsterilizationagentsondimensionalaccuracyofdifferentimpressionmaterialsinimplantprosthesisaninvitrostudy
AT gyanendrapandey assessmentofeffectofdifferentsterilizationagentsondimensionalaccuracyofdifferentimpressionmaterialsinimplantprosthesisaninvitrostudy
AT revatisingh assessmentofeffectofdifferentsterilizationagentsondimensionalaccuracyofdifferentimpressionmaterialsinimplantprosthesisaninvitrostudy
_version_ 1718420151788896256