Effect of Nylon Vs. Polyglactin (Vicryl) in Appendectomy Skin Sutures

Context Solitary rectal ulcer (SRU) is a disease with many challenging issues. There are several controversies about the basic pathophysiology of this disease. Despite its name, “solitary rectal ulcer”, more than a quarter of patients do not show any ulcer in colonoscopy. Instead, many patients show...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Hajar Khazraei, Abdul-Razzak Kalaf Hassan, Masoomeh Rahimi
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2015
Materias:	nylons polyglactin appendectomy skin Medicine R
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/ade7b37c5b4f463a909970112a591bd5
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:ade7b37c5b4f463a909970112a591bd5
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:ade7b37c5b4f463a909970112a591bd52021-11-15T09:41:08ZEffect of Nylon Vs. Polyglactin (Vicryl) in Appendectomy Skin Sutures2783-243010.17795/acr-34673https://doaj.org/article/ade7b37c5b4f463a909970112a591bd52015-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://colorectalresearch.sums.ac.ir/article_45505_49f2137334e4c860fd2be7ca46578737.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2783-2430Context Solitary rectal ulcer (SRU) is a disease with many challenging issues. There are several controversies about the basic pathophysiology of this disease. Despite its name, “solitary rectal ulcer”, more than a quarter of patients do not show any ulcer in colonoscopy. Instead, many patients show multiple polypoid lesions. Some previous reports have suggested calling this disease “rectal mucosal prolapse” instead of SRU, however, most of the patients do not have mucosal prolapse. In addition, colonoscopic findings can be very similar to cancer and inflammatory bowel disease, so without histologic evaluation, accurate diagnosis is not always possible. In patients with SRU, sometimes the rectal mucosa is so fibrotic that mucosal biopsy is inadequate, and even a pathologist cannot diagnose the characteristic histologic findings. There are various therapeutic approaches for the treatment of SRU, both surgical and nonsurgical, all of which are not optimal, and recurrence rates are still high with many patients experiencing complications even after surgery, resection and rectopexy. Evidence Acquisition Although this disease is not uncommon in Iran, there are very few studies from Iran, therefore, in this review we will describe our experience with patients with SRU in affiliated hospitals of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. We will also review previously published articles about SRU that are indexed in PubMed and Google scholar, emphasizing the challenging issues. Results SRU is not an uncommon disease in Iran, however the number of published articles about it, is very low. Multicentric studies are necessary to find out the definite reason of this issue. Conclusions There are still many conflicting controversies about the etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and also treatment of SRU, which need further investigation and longer follow up of the patient in each therapeutic approach to be better understood.Hajar KhazraeiAbdul-Razzak Kalaf HassanMasoomeh RahimiShiraz University of Medical SciencesarticlenylonspolyglactinappendectomyskinMedicineRENIranian Journal of Colorectal Research, Vol 3, Iss 4, Pp 0-0 (2015)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	nylons polyglactin appendectomy skin Medicine R
spellingShingle	nylons polyglactin appendectomy skin Medicine R Hajar Khazraei Abdul-Razzak Kalaf Hassan Masoomeh Rahimi Effect of Nylon Vs. Polyglactin (Vicryl) in Appendectomy Skin Sutures
description	Context Solitary rectal ulcer (SRU) is a disease with many challenging issues. There are several controversies about the basic pathophysiology of this disease. Despite its name, “solitary rectal ulcer”, more than a quarter of patients do not show any ulcer in colonoscopy. Instead, many patients show multiple polypoid lesions. Some previous reports have suggested calling this disease “rectal mucosal prolapse” instead of SRU, however, most of the patients do not have mucosal prolapse. In addition, colonoscopic findings can be very similar to cancer and inflammatory bowel disease, so without histologic evaluation, accurate diagnosis is not always possible. In patients with SRU, sometimes the rectal mucosa is so fibrotic that mucosal biopsy is inadequate, and even a pathologist cannot diagnose the characteristic histologic findings. There are various therapeutic approaches for the treatment of SRU, both surgical and nonsurgical, all of which are not optimal, and recurrence rates are still high with many patients experiencing complications even after surgery, resection and rectopexy. Evidence Acquisition Although this disease is not uncommon in Iran, there are very few studies from Iran, therefore, in this review we will describe our experience with patients with SRU in affiliated hospitals of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. We will also review previously published articles about SRU that are indexed in PubMed and Google scholar, emphasizing the challenging issues. Results SRU is not an uncommon disease in Iran, however the number of published articles about it, is very low. Multicentric studies are necessary to find out the definite reason of this issue. Conclusions There are still many conflicting controversies about the etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and also treatment of SRU, which need further investigation and longer follow up of the patient in each therapeutic approach to be better understood.
format	article
author	Hajar Khazraei Abdul-Razzak Kalaf Hassan Masoomeh Rahimi
author_facet	Hajar Khazraei Abdul-Razzak Kalaf Hassan Masoomeh Rahimi
author_sort	Hajar Khazraei
title	Effect of Nylon Vs. Polyglactin (Vicryl) in Appendectomy Skin Sutures
title_short	Effect of Nylon Vs. Polyglactin (Vicryl) in Appendectomy Skin Sutures
title_full	Effect of Nylon Vs. Polyglactin (Vicryl) in Appendectomy Skin Sutures
title_fullStr	Effect of Nylon Vs. Polyglactin (Vicryl) in Appendectomy Skin Sutures
title_full_unstemmed	Effect of Nylon Vs. Polyglactin (Vicryl) in Appendectomy Skin Sutures
title_sort	effect of nylon vs. polyglactin (vicryl) in appendectomy skin sutures
publisher	Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
publishDate	2015
url	https://doaj.org/article/ade7b37c5b4f463a909970112a591bd5
work_keys_str_mv	AT hajarkhazraei effectofnylonvspolyglactinvicrylinappendectomyskinsutures AT abdulrazzakkalafhassan effectofnylonvspolyglactinvicrylinappendectomyskinsutures AT masoomehrahimi effectofnylonvspolyglactinvicrylinappendectomyskinsutures
_version_	1718428516352000000

Effect of Nylon Vs. Polyglactin (Vicryl) in Appendectomy Skin Sutures

Ejemplares similares