What evidence is there for the homology of protein-protein interactions?

The notion that sequence homology implies functional similarity underlies much of computational biology. In the case of protein-protein interactions, an interaction can be inferred between two proteins on the basis that sequence-similar proteins have been observed to interact. The use of transferred...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anna C F Lewis, Nick S Jones, Mason A Porter, Charlotte M Deane
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/ae105e170f5c421e973135e36bec3fe7
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:ae105e170f5c421e973135e36bec3fe7
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:ae105e170f5c421e973135e36bec3fe72021-11-18T05:50:59ZWhat evidence is there for the homology of protein-protein interactions?1553-734X1553-735810.1371/journal.pcbi.1002645https://doaj.org/article/ae105e170f5c421e973135e36bec3fe72012-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/23028270/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1553-734Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/1553-7358The notion that sequence homology implies functional similarity underlies much of computational biology. In the case of protein-protein interactions, an interaction can be inferred between two proteins on the basis that sequence-similar proteins have been observed to interact. The use of transferred interactions is common, but the legitimacy of such inferred interactions is not clear. Here we investigate transferred interactions and whether data incompleteness explains the lack of evidence found for them. Using definitions of homology associated with functional annotation transfer, we estimate that conservation rates of interactions are low even after taking interactome incompleteness into account. For example, at a blastp E-value threshold of 10(-70), we estimate the conservation rate to be about 11 % between S. cerevisiae and H. sapiens. Our method also produces estimates of interactome sizes (which are similar to those previously proposed). Using our estimates of interaction conservation we estimate the rate at which protein-protein interactions are lost across species. To our knowledge, this is the first such study based on large-scale data. Previous work has suggested that interactions transferred within species are more reliable than interactions transferred across species. By controlling for factors that are specific to within-species interaction prediction, we propose that the transfer of interactions within species might be less reliable than transfers between species. Protein-protein interactions appear to be very rarely conserved unless very high sequence similarity is observed. Consequently, inferred interactions should be used with care.Anna C F LewisNick S JonesMason A PorterCharlotte M DeanePublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleBiology (General)QH301-705.5ENPLoS Computational Biology, Vol 8, Iss 9, p e1002645 (2012)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
spellingShingle Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Anna C F Lewis
Nick S Jones
Mason A Porter
Charlotte M Deane
What evidence is there for the homology of protein-protein interactions?
description The notion that sequence homology implies functional similarity underlies much of computational biology. In the case of protein-protein interactions, an interaction can be inferred between two proteins on the basis that sequence-similar proteins have been observed to interact. The use of transferred interactions is common, but the legitimacy of such inferred interactions is not clear. Here we investigate transferred interactions and whether data incompleteness explains the lack of evidence found for them. Using definitions of homology associated with functional annotation transfer, we estimate that conservation rates of interactions are low even after taking interactome incompleteness into account. For example, at a blastp E-value threshold of 10(-70), we estimate the conservation rate to be about 11 % between S. cerevisiae and H. sapiens. Our method also produces estimates of interactome sizes (which are similar to those previously proposed). Using our estimates of interaction conservation we estimate the rate at which protein-protein interactions are lost across species. To our knowledge, this is the first such study based on large-scale data. Previous work has suggested that interactions transferred within species are more reliable than interactions transferred across species. By controlling for factors that are specific to within-species interaction prediction, we propose that the transfer of interactions within species might be less reliable than transfers between species. Protein-protein interactions appear to be very rarely conserved unless very high sequence similarity is observed. Consequently, inferred interactions should be used with care.
format article
author Anna C F Lewis
Nick S Jones
Mason A Porter
Charlotte M Deane
author_facet Anna C F Lewis
Nick S Jones
Mason A Porter
Charlotte M Deane
author_sort Anna C F Lewis
title What evidence is there for the homology of protein-protein interactions?
title_short What evidence is there for the homology of protein-protein interactions?
title_full What evidence is there for the homology of protein-protein interactions?
title_fullStr What evidence is there for the homology of protein-protein interactions?
title_full_unstemmed What evidence is there for the homology of protein-protein interactions?
title_sort what evidence is there for the homology of protein-protein interactions?
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2012
url https://doaj.org/article/ae105e170f5c421e973135e36bec3fe7
work_keys_str_mv AT annacflewis whatevidenceisthereforthehomologyofproteinproteininteractions
AT nicksjones whatevidenceisthereforthehomologyofproteinproteininteractions
AT masonaporter whatevidenceisthereforthehomologyofproteinproteininteractions
AT charlottemdeane whatevidenceisthereforthehomologyofproteinproteininteractions
_version_ 1718424807659274240