Discrete water quality sampling at open-water aquaculture sites: limitations and strategies

While environmental performance of cage-based aquaculture is most often monitored through benthic conditions, there may also be requirements that necessitate discrete, pelagic sampling. In the pelagic realm, adequately capturing the spatial and temporal dynamics of interest and attributing causality...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: HM Jansen, GK Reid, RJ Bannister, V Husa, SMC Robinson, JA Cooper, C Quinton, Ø Strand
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Inter-Research 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/ae285262b23b472f8132bea443108614
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:ae285262b23b472f8132bea443108614
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:ae285262b23b472f8132bea4431086142021-11-11T11:05:40ZDiscrete water quality sampling at open-water aquaculture sites: limitations and strategies1869-215X1869-753410.3354/aei00192https://doaj.org/article/ae285262b23b472f8132bea4431086142016-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.int-res.com/abstracts/aei/v8/p463-480/https://doaj.org/toc/1869-215Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/1869-7534While environmental performance of cage-based aquaculture is most often monitored through benthic conditions, there may also be requirements that necessitate discrete, pelagic sampling. In the pelagic realm, adequately capturing the spatial and temporal dynamics of interest and attributing causality to aquaculture processes can be extremely challenging. Conditions are seldom ideal, and data adequacy concerns of discrete samples collected at open-water aquaculture sites are not uncommon. Further exploration of these challenges is needed. Herein, we aim to explore considerations for study design, analysis, and data interpretation of discrete pelagic sampling. As examples, we present 2 case studies where limited sampling occurred under conditions of complex pelagic dynamics. A Norwegian case study quantified particle abundance around salmon farms, and aimed to highlight the effects of spatial-temporal variation on sampling design, the need for inclusion of companion parameters, and the benefits of a priori and a posteriori data interpretation strategies. A Canadian case study collected discrete samples to measure ammonium concentrations with continuous current measurements at an Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture (IMTA) farm, to explore issues of complex hydrodynamics, reference site suitability, sampling resolution, data pooling, and post hoc power tests. We further discuss lessons learned and the implications of study design, ambient conditions, physical processes, farm management, statistical analysis, companion parameters, and the potential for confounding effects. Pragmatic consideration of these aspects will ultimately serve to better frame the costs and benefits of discrete pelagic sampling at open-water aquaculture sites.HM JansenGK ReidRJ BannisterV HusaSMC RobinsonJA CooperC QuintonØ StrandInter-ResearcharticleAquaculture. Fisheries. AnglingSH1-691EcologyQH540-549.5ENAquaculture Environment Interactions, Vol 8, Pp 463-480 (2016)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Aquaculture. Fisheries. Angling
SH1-691
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle Aquaculture. Fisheries. Angling
SH1-691
Ecology
QH540-549.5
HM Jansen
GK Reid
RJ Bannister
V Husa
SMC Robinson
JA Cooper
C Quinton
Ø Strand
Discrete water quality sampling at open-water aquaculture sites: limitations and strategies
description While environmental performance of cage-based aquaculture is most often monitored through benthic conditions, there may also be requirements that necessitate discrete, pelagic sampling. In the pelagic realm, adequately capturing the spatial and temporal dynamics of interest and attributing causality to aquaculture processes can be extremely challenging. Conditions are seldom ideal, and data adequacy concerns of discrete samples collected at open-water aquaculture sites are not uncommon. Further exploration of these challenges is needed. Herein, we aim to explore considerations for study design, analysis, and data interpretation of discrete pelagic sampling. As examples, we present 2 case studies where limited sampling occurred under conditions of complex pelagic dynamics. A Norwegian case study quantified particle abundance around salmon farms, and aimed to highlight the effects of spatial-temporal variation on sampling design, the need for inclusion of companion parameters, and the benefits of a priori and a posteriori data interpretation strategies. A Canadian case study collected discrete samples to measure ammonium concentrations with continuous current measurements at an Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture (IMTA) farm, to explore issues of complex hydrodynamics, reference site suitability, sampling resolution, data pooling, and post hoc power tests. We further discuss lessons learned and the implications of study design, ambient conditions, physical processes, farm management, statistical analysis, companion parameters, and the potential for confounding effects. Pragmatic consideration of these aspects will ultimately serve to better frame the costs and benefits of discrete pelagic sampling at open-water aquaculture sites.
format article
author HM Jansen
GK Reid
RJ Bannister
V Husa
SMC Robinson
JA Cooper
C Quinton
Ø Strand
author_facet HM Jansen
GK Reid
RJ Bannister
V Husa
SMC Robinson
JA Cooper
C Quinton
Ø Strand
author_sort HM Jansen
title Discrete water quality sampling at open-water aquaculture sites: limitations and strategies
title_short Discrete water quality sampling at open-water aquaculture sites: limitations and strategies
title_full Discrete water quality sampling at open-water aquaculture sites: limitations and strategies
title_fullStr Discrete water quality sampling at open-water aquaculture sites: limitations and strategies
title_full_unstemmed Discrete water quality sampling at open-water aquaculture sites: limitations and strategies
title_sort discrete water quality sampling at open-water aquaculture sites: limitations and strategies
publisher Inter-Research
publishDate 2016
url https://doaj.org/article/ae285262b23b472f8132bea443108614
work_keys_str_mv AT hmjansen discretewaterqualitysamplingatopenwateraquaculturesiteslimitationsandstrategies
AT gkreid discretewaterqualitysamplingatopenwateraquaculturesiteslimitationsandstrategies
AT rjbannister discretewaterqualitysamplingatopenwateraquaculturesiteslimitationsandstrategies
AT vhusa discretewaterqualitysamplingatopenwateraquaculturesiteslimitationsandstrategies
AT smcrobinson discretewaterqualitysamplingatopenwateraquaculturesiteslimitationsandstrategies
AT jacooper discretewaterqualitysamplingatopenwateraquaculturesiteslimitationsandstrategies
AT cquinton discretewaterqualitysamplingatopenwateraquaculturesiteslimitationsandstrategies
AT østrand discretewaterqualitysamplingatopenwateraquaculturesiteslimitationsandstrategies
_version_ 1718439157666152448