Manual versus mechanical compression hemostasis approach after coronary angiography via snuffbox access
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Farshad Roghani- Dehkordi, Elham Zangeneh, Mohammad Kermani-Alghoraishi |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
KARE Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/aeb2d453d19a4176be995fe9db36ea7a |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
A comparative study of Terumo radial Band® and PreludeSYNC hemostasis compression device after transradial coronary catheterization
por: Jahanzeb Malik, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Is myocardial bridge more frequently detected on radial access coronary angiography?
por: Oktay Şenöz, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Safety and Effectiveness of Coronary Angiography or Intervention through the Distal Radial Access: A Meta-Analysis
por: Jun Cao, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Evaluation of radial artery endothelial functions in transradial coronary angiography according to different radial access sites
por: Elton Soydan, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Intravascular Ultrasound-guided Versus Angiography-guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Evidence from Observational Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials
por: Xiao-Fei Gao, et al.
Publicado: (2020)